Emily Jiang <emij...@googlemail.com>: Feb 21 11:25AM
I strongly disagree with forking MP Config to Jakarta with namespace
changes. This introduces unnecessary headaches and namespace clashes in the
IDEs. Why cannot Jakarta EE adopt MicroProfile Config
...more
|
Ondro Mihályi <mih...@omnifish.ee>: Feb 21 02:21PM +0100
Hi,
Yes, MP decided on the pull model. That means that the decision is solely
on Jakarta EE, with the pull model, MicroProfile has decided they don't
care about EE.
Copying/forking MP Config
...more
|
Roberto Cortez <radc...@yahoo.com>: Feb 21 02:20PM
Hi,
Can you please clarify which standards MicroProfile Config cannot meet?
Also, why is there an assumption that MP Config wouldn’t accept some sort of release alignment? MP projects are
...more
|
Werner Keil <werne...@gmail.com>: Feb 21 06:25AM -0800
Although config seems a rather slow-moving, kind of mature technology and
spec now, given there's been no real change over the past 3 years or so
(neither in Jakarta nor MP config) there could be
...more
|
Werner Keil <werne...@gmail.com>: Feb 21 06:28AM -0800
I am very much with Steve and as the Committer/Community rep in the Spec
Committee I also represent the wider community and customers who need to
use these things.
And like vendors (only 4 of
...more
|
Werner Keil <werne...@gmail.com>: Feb 21 06:54AM -0800
As Steve mentioned, the adoption and true certification of MP is merely a
fraction of Jakarta EE.
The most recent MP versions only got certified by one or two products,
before that MP 6 had 4
...more
|
Ondro Mihályi <mih...@omnifish.ee>: Feb 21 04:26PM +0100
Roberto, now you’re talking from a position of MicroProfile, not from
Jakarta EE. MicroProfile vhode the pull model, and thus simply ignored
Jakarta EE. There are simply no guarantees for Jakarta
...more
|
Reza Rahman <m.reza...@gmail.com>: Feb 21 10:31AM -0500
This is indeed a very important branding, marketing, and strategic
consideration. What we observe is that while Jakarta EE adoption and
usage is not stellar, MicroProfile adoption and usage fares
...more
|
Roberto Cortez <radc...@yahoo.com>: Feb 21 04:10PM
Obviously, I’m biased here, but my goal is to have proper arguments either way.
What sort of guarantees does Jakarta need? Jakarta also depends on the Java language and many of the Java APIs.
...more
|
Ondro Mihályi <mih...@omnifish.ee>: Feb 21 06:00PM +0100
Based on what we both wrote, Roberto, I think that a way to resolve this,
is to move MP Config to Jakarta EE and keep the package prefixes. Option
number 1 in the list of options I described
...more
|
Ed Burns <Edward...@microsoft.com>: Feb 21 06:00PM
Note about email lists:
As predicted, discussion has fragmented across several lists. I realize this is a side effect of the choice to continue discussion using this "both lists on the To: line"
...more
|
Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry....@oracle.com>: Feb 21 06:56PM
+1
________________________________
From: config-dev <config-de...@eclipse.org> on behalf of Ed Burns via config-dev <confi...@eclipse.org>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 19:00
...more
|
Dmitry Kornilov <maid...@gmail.com>: Feb 21 10:56AM -0800
+1
пятница, 21 февраля 2025 г. в 19:00:49 UTC+1, Ed Burns:
...more
|
Roberto Cortez <radc...@yahoo.com>: Feb 21 07:01PM
Yes, but you make it sound that the issues you raise are totally unfixable. Maybe they are, I would just want to know why people feel that way?
> But I doubt that this is the way to go in reality.
...more
|
Roberto Cortez <radc...@yahoo.com>: Feb 21 07:45PM
If Jakarta wants to move forward with a Config specification, there is nothing MP can do about it, but I believe both communities care about the users and want to find some common ground to cooperate.
...more
|