Vote on the repo name created under langchin4j

[Emily Jiang]

Further to the conversation regarding where the repo smallrye-lm should be landed, based on this thread, the consensus was to contribute this repo to langchain4j. The current prototype of smallrye-llm has the integration of MicroProfile Config, Fault Tolerance, Telemetry and Jakarta CDI.

As for the new repo name, even though the smallrye-llm was started from MP AI discussions as a prototype, it is important to have Jakarta on the repo name to indicate MicroProfile and Jakarta together work nicely with the langchain4j framework. I checked with Eclipse Foundation EMO regarding the usage of MicroProifle and Jakarta in other github org. Eclipse Foundation permits us to use MicroProfile and Jakarta part of the repo name with the requirement of putting an R-in-a-circle on the first use of Jakarta or MicroProfile in text, along with a trademark attribution. 

Currently there are 2 options on the table for the repo names:

• Option 1: langchain4j-microprofile-jakarta (a recognition of the original work from MicroProfile and most integrations are for MP specs)
• Option 2: langcahin4j-jakarta-microprofile (demonstrating jakarta CDI is heavily used)

Both options have some merits. In order to settle on one, we need MP committers to decide with your votes.

Voting runs from 18th Feb and ends on 25th Feb 2025. Only MicroProfile committers have binding votes. The non MicroProfile committers are welcome to vote but will counted as non-binding votes.

Thanks

Emily

[Ed Burns]

Microsoft votes 0 on this. Our primary concern is that users of LangChain4j are aware that MicroProfile and Jakarta EE support is on-par with what is provided by Spring.

Thanks,

Ed

[Emily Jiang]

Option 1

[Mohamed AIT ABDERRAHMAN]

Hello,

Option 1

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/7ef454df-8a5c-42d1-a4ef-03d9eb5a9c02n%40googlegroups.com.

[Ed Bratt]

Option 2

Shouldn't this question also be asked on the e-mail list (not sure if it should be microprofile-dev or microprofile-wg)? I thought there were contributors that didn't or could not subscribe to this Google Group.

[Ed Burns]

Microsoft votes Option 1.

[Michael Redlich]

+1 for Option 1 (non-binding)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/7ef454df-8a5c-42d1-a4ef-03d9eb5a9c02n%40googlegroups.com.

--

Code, Test, Write, Cycle, Run, Drink, Sleep ... Repeat

Java Champion

Director, Garden State JUG

Lead Java Queue Editor, InfoQ

Contract Developer Advocate, Payara

About Me

@mpredli

redlich.net/

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler

he/him/his

[John Clingan]

I'd prefer just langchain4j-microprofile because zero work was done in Jakarta. But that is not an option.

Option 1.

On Tuesday, February 18, 2025 at 10:15:56 AM UTC-8 Emily Jiang wrote:

[Amelia Eiras]

Option 1, my vote as a committer. 💛

Amelia Eiras 

http://tomitribe.com   

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/33211b78-fbef-4071-ba9f-37496a24174cn%40googlegroups.com.

[Ryan St. James]

+1 for Option One

Ryan

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/CAJ0g8j4GjZs6J2zZ2E0iAKDTyVZsWJ3wf%3DhqsvQoCH9J0FsJ_w%40mail.gmail.com.

--

 

 Ryan St. James 

 rstj...@tomitribe.com
 @s8ntjames

 tomitribe.com
 tomitribe.io

 

[Luis Eufrasio Teixeira Neto]

Option 1

[Kenji Kazumura]

Option2

2025年2月26日水曜日 4:13:10 UTC+9 luis.e...@gmail.com:

[Emerson Castaneda]

Option 1

Emerson Castañeda

(Committer Representative) 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/7ef454df-8a5c-42d1-a4ef-03d9eb5a9c02n%40googlegroups.com.

[Emily Jiang]

Thank you for casting your vote! Below is the summary of the votes:

Option 1:

Binding votes: 6 (Emily, Ed Burns, John, Amelia, Ryan, Emerson)

Non-binding votes: 3 (Mohamed, Micahel, Luis)

Option 2:

Binding votes:  2 (Kenji, Jan)

Non-binding votes: 1 (Ed Bratt)

Either:

Non-binding votes: 1 (Reza)

I declare the winning vote is Option 1

The next step is to have the repo langchain4j-microprofile-jakarta created under the langchain4j org and then populate the repo in due course.

Thanks

Emily

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/7ef454df-8a5c-42d1-a4ef-03d9eb5a9c02n%40googlegroups.com.

--

Thanks
Emily

[Ed Bratt]

Emily

Not that it would change the outcome, but could you please remind me the distinction between Binding and Non-Binding votes? Is this committer, non-committer?

-- Ed

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
micropr...@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!MV-Lj4HoCfMWJOAcSeSAVyqQdOMhu7vmeHJ0FQGb8SnaKpdCbIpaqyThNT0qSdPPALjLRnw3fGq8VrBoIatvZ8oVehA$ 

[Emily Jiang]

Hi Ed,

Binding: MicroProfile committer vote

Non-binding: non MicroProfile committee vote.

It is not about MicroProfile specification, so it is not a working group vote.

Voting runs from 18th Feb and ends on 25th Feb 2025. Only MicroProfile committers have binding votes. The non MicroProfile committers are welcome to vote but will counted as non-binding votes.

The voting and counting criteria was spelled out clearly on the voting thread.

Thanks

Emily

--

Thanks
Emily