Gold Standard v 1.8

[Stefano Parmesan]

The last version still contains issues (i.e.: 93353416851595264)

BTW: why are some numbers annotated with the sharp? (92691957394051072 contains #128 for example) ? Do we have to deal with numbers and hashtags in two different ways? I would expect to have just "128" as spot for http://dbpedia.org/resource/128_(number)

--

Dott. Stefano Parmesan

Backend Web Developer and Data Lover ~ SpazioDati s.r.l.

Via del Brennero, 52 – 38122 Trento – Italy

[Stefano Parmesan]

in 89506614285041664 "0" is annotated with http://dbpedia.org/resource/1_(number)

in 92949506081034240 "1700" is annotated with http://dbpedia.org/resource/2_(number)

in 100373381538529280 other missing \t

in 103137083945783296 other missing \t

This is really getting ridiculous...

[Stefano Parmesan]

101020302405931008 http://dbpedia.org/resource/430_(number) actually redirects to http://dbpedia.org/resource/400_(number)

91733759036108800 "six" si annotated with http://dbpedia.org/resource/6_(number), but the text says "six billion"; okay that on wikipedia there's no page for "six billion", but you should not annotate "6_(number)" as it's not the intended meaning in this case;

91957731992420352 "56" is not annotated;

91997280936263680 "one" is not annotated;

[MSM]

Dear Stefano,

Thanks very much for your comments, we have addressed them in version 1.9.

Regarding the entity mention "six billion", you are correct in that it cannot be mapped to DBpedia. For this reason we followed the rule described in our guidelines (see for e.g. " [Sony]'s [Android Honeycomb] Tablet"), and we split "six billion" into its embedded entities, which in this case are "six" and "billion". As a consequence, we annotated only the number "six" (http://dbpedia.org/resource/6_(number)).

Hope it clarifies.
Best wishes,
#Microposts2014 Challenge crew

On 24/02/2014 15:18, Stefano Parmesan wrote:

101020302405931008 http://dbpedia.org/resource/430_(number) actually redirects to http://dbpedia.org/resource/400_(number)

91733759036108800 "six" si annotated with http://dbpedia.org/resource/6_(number), but the text says "six billion"; okay that on wikipedia there's no page for "six billion", but you should not annotate "6_(number)" as it's not the intended meaning in this case;

91957731992420352 "56" is not annotated;

91997280936263680 "one" is not annotated;

2014-02-24 15:02 GMT+01:00 Stefano Parmesan <parm...@spaziodati.eu>:

in 89506614285041664 "0" is annotated with http://dbpedia.org/resource/1_(number)

in 92949506081034240 "1700" is annotated with http://dbpedia.org/resource/2_(number)

in 100373381538529280 other missing \t

in 103137083945783296 other missing \t

This is really getting ridiculous...

2014-02-24 13:15 GMT+01:00 Stefano Parmesan <parm...@spaziodati.eu>:

The last version still contains issues (i.e.: 93353416851595264)

BTW: why are some numbers annotated with the sharp? (92691957394051072 contains #128 for example) ? Do we have to deal with numbers and hashtags in two different ways? I would expect to have just "128" as spot for http://dbpedia.org/resource/128_(number)

--

Dott. Stefano Parmesan

Backend Web Developer and Data Lover ~ SpazioDati s.r.l.

Via del Brennero, 52 – 38122 Trento – Italy

--

Dott. Stefano Parmesan

Backend Web Developer and Data Lover ~ SpazioDati s.r.l.

Via del Brennero, 52 – 38122 Trento – Italy

--

Dott. Stefano Parmesan

Backend Web Developer and Data Lover ~ SpazioDati s.r.l.

Via del Brennero, 52 – 38122 Trento – Italy

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "microposts2014" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microposts201...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/microposts2014.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[MSM]

Dear Stefano,

Thanks very much for spotting these problems. In the new gold standard (version 1.9) we have removed the # sign from the entity mention "#128".
In the guidelines we mentioned that we ignore # and @ from the entity mentions, so there is no need to make any difference between hashtags and numbers.

Hope it helps.
Best wishes,
#Microposts Challenged crew