Big science if psychology is not free of peblic pseudo-concepts.

[ac]

 

quotation:

"Evidence from written comments made by part of one group of Ss indicates that

the more aspirations diverge from realistic predictions, the more defensive

the behavior of the S becomes."

 

SINS ( and only the ones i know) ARE AS FOLLOWS:

 

1. In no way lose note are subject to quantomizing in the liniar function expressed.

    ( apropos, by 1949 we already have Yerkes idntifying these as bell type of curves;

      aka invesrse U; tehse are nostraight relationships like that; author dos not say

       if he is only looking at the part of the spectrum that might create such ikllkusion.

 

What he does is a roiund drow of initrila statement of hypotheses for the experimental

of ex- post facto anal;yses and not the conclusion ( and this needs tobe reminded here and elswhere)

 

   ( author makes self intrapsycic (that is the term of time - we did think that in 50 ties a little,

that there is inner matric insigh the head; we do not do these now; and this is methodologically

garbage now: I do not rememeber if that would be seen that way )

 

2. Attemted ex post facto procedure of analyses is so floaded that I do not know where to start.

    SoI clean the table first.

 

 Using this ocassion for free thrills for your people I fast specify what can be done around

 the concepts: aspiration level, defence-veness level.

 

- First, definitions of these in the behavioral terms that are not 'intrapsychic". THE DEFENSIVENESS

HERE IS CONFUSED WITH AUTHONOMY AS THE INDIVIDUAL AUTHONOMY PART OF THE SELF

ESTEEM AND THE GROUP AUTHONOMY THAT GOES HEAD IN HAND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT

OF THE GROUP COHESIVENESS;   AND AFTER CLEARING TEH CONCEPT DEFENSIVENES IN THE BEHAVIORALTERMS IS WHAT? ( USING TO BIG SWORD FOR THE TASK DEMAND MIGHT BE THE ONE

IF DRIVEN BY ..... ( FIND ME PLEASS E) TASK QUALITY OF ELICITING  HIGHT ENGAGEMENT

BY SEQUENCING THAT CAN NOT BE RESISTED BT LETS TO FIRGER THE MASTER OR THE OPPOSITE;

I AM NOT EXOSTING SELF HERE - IT IS NOT ALL IN TE CONCEPT)

 

- These questionaires have to be tested on large number of people and not students.

 

- ( students already have escalated aspirations thus will sque the distribution; in anything research

   remaining we get representative drow of the general population first; NOT A CONCLUSION FIRST

   and not from the  croked flight)

 

 

 

3. Aspiration as the one that is not just ow strong is the reponce to the threat by master, is to be

elicited not onlty theoretically but in neatly put together randomisation process for the procedure.