Global village lessens today.
ac
( reportedly, Oxford Space Program occupies Polisg "global village"
Quote: "Thus "a child learns what power independent of itself is as it goes through the Oedipus complex . . . encountering the existence of a symbolic system independent of itself".[22] Moreover, Lacan's proposal that "the ternary relation of the Oedipus complex" liberates the "prisoner of the dual relationship" of the son–mother relationship proved useful to later psychoanalysts;[23] thus, for Bollas, the "achievement" of the Oedipus complex is that the "child comes to understand something about the oddity of possessing one's own mind . . . discovers the multiplicity of points of view".[24] Likewise, for Ronald Britton, "if the link between the parents perceived in love and hate can be tolerated in the child's mind . . . this provides us with a capacity for seeing us in interaction with others, and . . . for reflecting on ourselves, whilst being ourselves".[25]/ 25.^ Ivan Wood On a Darkling Plain: Journey into the Unconscious (Cambridge 2002) "Ronald Britton"
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 10:39:37 AM me wrote:
REVISING OEDIPUS DESTINY TODAY Things that teens know and adults do not NYT: How to Build a Nation From Scratch By ANNE POIRET and FLORENCE MARTIN-KESSLER Two filmmakers present a 12-step program for establishing the world’s newest country: South Sudan. THAT IS BY PLAYING THE VIDEO/COMPUTER GAME: 'CIVILISATION' AND AT THE SAME TIME ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF THEIR OWN PERSONAL POWER IN THE WORLD, AS AN IDENTITY FORMATION CORE ISSUE, IN TH EMOCK PERFORMANCE. IT SHOULD GET GOOD. I HOPE THAT THESE GAMES DID NOT HAVE GUNS AND AIR ASSAULT WEAPONS, AS THESE CLEARLY WORK AGAINST THE PERSONAL POWER/EFFICACY SELF EXPERIENCE AND SELF EXPOSURE (THE 'SMALL LOOP', AS WE CALL IT). IN OLD DAYS THEY BE ALREADY ON THE HORSE. IT COULD BE THAT HISTORICAL NEEDS OF PARENTS AND THEIR OWN FILOGENETIC 'CODE' AS WE LIKE TO CALL THESE, ARE INVOKED IN THESE GAMES. AGAIN, BIG BOSSORS, IN YOUR HAEDS TODAY, YOU ARE BIGGER IF YOU HAD THE GUN THEN OR WHEN YOU HAVE NOT HAD THEM USED, OR EVEN JUST ON YOU. WHICH ONE OF YOU IS STRONGER TODAY. MYTH HAS IT TOO, ALL THE WAY FROM ATHENS AND THEBS. AND NOW YOU/WE GET IT RIGHT TOO, derived from the dicussions on competitiveness: (when unhealthy, believed by developmental specialistists, that it might have rots in not resolving inner dive;lopmetal dilemas but getting stock in them): "The identification of punishment options and the selection of the option most appropriate to the situation fall within the divine domain of decision making. But Theban King Oedipus trespasses when he competitively expands the scope of application. He widens the eligible candidates to those who have but do not share information as well as those who harbor or help the guilty even if the accessories and the guilty be found in the royal household." Rate this answer. Here it means that this answer is from the news group, open internet discussion. Often these are insighfull and most times more to the point that the literatur in the topic, like this one that 8islike the whole ocean. DO WE AGREE WITH THIS VIEW ON COMPETITIVENESS.
i am relising taht we not doing thios one ( historical myth) : The Thebaid, of uncertain authorship but sometimes attributed in antiquity to Homer: told the story of the war between Oedipus' two sons Eteocles and Polynices, and of Polynices' unsuccessful expedition against the city of Thebes with six other commanders (the "Seven Against Thebes"), in which both Eteocles and Polynices were killed." or that one. WE ARE OURSELF, GROWN OF OF TEENS DILEMAS. AS FOR OEDIPUS , IF HE BETS FOR SELF THAT BE ALSO MINIMIZING, NOT MAXIMIZING, HIS IMMATURITY AND HAVING THE DEATH BED QUITER RATHER THEN BLOODIER.
( APPROPOS, oEDIPUS STILL IS NOPT A WOMEN; IF SHE WERE HE IS CALLED
ELECTRA AND IS NOT DOING WHAT MEN ARE DOING: GET IT - THERE IS NO SYMETRICITY LIKE THAT ANYWHERE IN THE HISTORY AND WILKLM,NOT BE ONE NOW; ESPECIALLY FOR OXFORD THAT DISCUSSES SUCH FRINGES IOF HUMANITY LESS, CONTRARY TO COMETITIVE AMBIOTION TO KEEP OXFORD PAPERS THERE; IN USA WE DO DISCUS THESE MATTERS NOT ONLY AS TEENS IN THE LITERATURE CLASSES, IN THE BUSENESS - AS THE BEST PSYCHO MODEL FOR TEMM MATCHING; IN PERSONAL GROWTH VENTURES; IN THE THEATERS, AS BEFORE AND MORE, MORE, MORE; WE RUN TO SOME OF THEM FOGGIES THOUGHT; SHELL WE? I got feedback taht Oxford got this one here, nevertheles)