CHIP- THINK USA

[ac]

1.  'Cuts in National Security, defence and education, mean loss of jobs'.

  WHAT DIS CHIP DO? FORGOT WHERE IS THE PRIORITY. THESE CUTS TAHT CHIPPED PERSON LISTS PRIMARILY WILL AFFECT THE FUNCTION THAT THE JOBS COVER. CHIP ALREADY DOES NOT LKNOW THAT ( THERE IS DIFFICULTY TO EVER MOCK THE HUMAN BRAIN), AND WHAT OCCURS IS THAT,  FIRSTLY, PRESIDENTS ONLY REMEBERS
THE JOBS ON CUTS ISSUE FIRST TIME AROUND BUT THE SECOND TIME AROUND,
DO NOT EVEN HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THESE JOBS AT CUT POINT - WILL NOT BE A PRESIDENT OF THAT SOCIETY WITHOUT NATIONAL SECURITY ,DEFENCE OR EDUCATION
FUNCTIONS AS THEY SINE QUANE NONE TO THE PRESIDENT

CHIPS, MIND YOU, DO NOT KNOW THESE; LIKEWISE PRTESIDENTS ON THE CHIP.

HE DID NPOT SAY ANYTHING WRONG?

THAT IS HOW THE DEPLETION IN THE NATIONAL THINKING CAN GO. WHAT ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCEWS? WHERE THEY ARE? ( IN SHORT, IN BOTH, HOW THE ISSUE IS PRESENTED AND THEN CPONSEQUENTLY HOW WE ALL THINK - NOT WORRYOYNG LIKE THAT THAT TOMPORROW THERE MIGHT BE JOBS BUT NO USA; NOT EVEN NOTICING THAT, LIKE
THAT IS NOTHING THAT OBVIEUSLY WRONG IN THE SPEACH, WHICH IT MISSES
THE POINT THAT HUMAN CAN PRIORATIZE PROPERLY)

[ac]

 I  AM THINKING NOT TO WAIST THINKING IN 'CHIP-THINK', CHANGING NAME

 FOR THE NEXT TIME ( IF, THAT IS OPTIMISTICALLY) TO 'CHIP THING'

 

On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 4:28:06 ac wrote:

1.  'Cuts in National Security, defence and education, mean loss of jobs'.

  WHAT DIS CHIP DO? FORGOT WHERE IS THE PRIORITY. THESE CUTS TAHT CHIPPED PERSON LISTS PRIMARILY WILL AFFECT THE FUNCTION THAT THE JOBS COVER. CHIP ALREADY DOES NOT LKNOW THAT ( THERE IS DIFFICULTY TO EVER MOCK THE HUMAN BRAIN), AND WHAT OCCURS IS THAT,  FIRSTLY, PRESIDENTS ONLY REMEBERS
THE JOBS ON CUTS ISSUE FIRST TIME AROUND BUT THE SECOND TIME AROUND,
DO NOT EVEN HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THESE JOBS AT CUT POINT - WILL NOT BE A PRESIDENT OF THAT SOCIETY WITHOUT NATIONAL SECURITY ,DEFENCE OR EDUCATION
FUNCTIONS AS THEY SINE QUANE NONE TO THE PRESIDENT

CHIPS, MIND YOU, DO NOT KNOW THESE; LIKEWISE PRTESIDENTS ON THE CHIP.

HE DID NOT SAY ANYTHING WRONG?

THAT IS HOW THE DEPLETION IN THE NATIONAL THINKING CAN GO. WHAT ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCEWS? WHERE THEY ARE? ( IN SHORT, IN BOTH, HOW THE ISSUE IS

PRESENTED AND THEN, CONSEQUENTLY, HOW WE ALL THINK - NOT WORRYING LIKE THAT THAT TOMORROW THERE MIGHT BE JOBS BUT NO USA; NOT EVEN NOTICING THAT, LIKE

THAT IS NOTHING THAT OBVIEUSLY WRONG IN THE SPEACH, WHICH IT MISSES
THE POINT THAT HUMAN CAN PRIORATIZE PROPERLY)

 

2. " CODES: 13/A12 - 51329             DJ                   3/24/00
            LG - 51329

This job specification is for state and local government use."

 

THAT IS FROM THE STATE HOME PAGE UNDER CURRENTLY UNNAUNCED JOBS, WHILE

JOB DESCRIPT IS 3/24/00; NO AUTHORITY THAT APPROVED THE FORM INDICATED WHILE

THIS IS A STATE POLICY.

 

AND 'BETTER' YET - IT COULD BE CIA ON THE TAX PAYER PAYROLL, STILL 'THINKING'?

[ac]

3. WASHINGTON — President Obama declared at the White House on Jan. 7 that Chuck Hagel, his nominee to be secretary of defense, would be the “first person of enlisted rank” to run the Pentagon. The distinction, which Mr. Obama called “historic,” quickly made its way into news media reports around the globe, including in The New York Times.

 

The problem is that at least four other American defense secretaries — Melvin R. Laird, Elliot L. Richardson, Caspar W. Weinberger and William J. Perry — served part of their military careers as enlisted men

 

WE CAN HANG DOWN HERE OR KEEP GOING.

 

NOW WHAT THE PROBLEMS AMERRICANS. CAN HIHSCHOOLERS ANSWER TEHSE. I BET THEY CAN. BUT LETETR IT GETS WORSE - AS IF AMERICANS DEPOLITICIZED BUT YET ACT AS IF POLITICALLY SAVVY.

WHAT IS PROPER PROCEDURE?

 

THAT LAST DAMMY STATEMENMT SUPOSED TO BE AMERICAN: NO - IT IS CHIPPY - CHIP THERE CAN NOPT HIDE - INNERLY POROCESS THE COVER FOR THATG SCAM IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH.

 

INVESTIGATION OF SUCH CHIPS IS EASY - THEY TELL WHERE IT IS JUST LIKE IN THIS SAMPLE, WHILE STILL SHOWING THAT CHIP CAN NOT DEVELOP SELF AWARNESS TO EVEN PROTECT HIM ON THE WRONG TRACK; AND MOREOVER THINKING STILL THAT OTHERS ARE OF CHIP MIND WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF IT. ( the satellite tremble indicated British M 16 in this dammy statement; they sound smart

but implicated here; I wander how they split like that - nasa responds, perhaps British;

 

the issue working with NASAs thatw ere abusesd in the space, but not all NASAs is that they have to get treatment first, just like people on earth while they have slightly different processing capacity for trauma - they might have been blamed here. REST BE HANDLED BY SECURITIES, QUESTION  BEINMG WHAT M 16 IS DOING T\IN THE TRANSACTION - ARE THEY FREE NOT TO SELF PROTECT - IN BUSINES

TO INTERCEPT USA , PLAINLY B/C THE SAME LIN E IN THE SKY INERCEPTS THEM -

 AND WHY THEY REFERE THE MATTER TO INCAPACITED IN SO MANY WAY AND NOT ORIENTED

NASA OF THEIRS)