--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "methylkit_discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to methylkit_discus...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/methylkit_discussion/63b32ef3-2239-4f33-b907-a42209eab801n%40googlegroups.com.
Hi Alex,
I solved the issue – it turned out to be something very simple. I was generating an input file by mimicking the structure of the object produced by methRead, just copying the columns I saw when exploring that object. The problem is that methRead actually transforms the original cytosine report (6 columns) into a 7-column structure. Once I generated an input resembling the Bismark cytosine report, I was able to complete the analysis pipeline.
However, the number of annotations and DhMRs I obtained was extremely low, even after relaxing the thresholds. Because of that, I decided to implement a different strategy, specifically the subtraction approach described in Booth et al., 2012 (DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r69). In this work, they analyze different hydroxymethylation contexts and, to improve statistical power, aggregate by CpG islands (CGIs).
At this point I wonder: is there any way to run a methylKit analysis directly at the CGI level? My 5hmC data has the following structure:
Would it be possible to build some kind of methylKit-compatible input from this table?
And more conceptually: to what extent can a CGI be understood as a "tile" in the methylKit framework?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Julia
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/methylkit_discussion/4b183cbb-6d86-4d23-846f-d123fb3831d5n%40googlegroups.com.