I replied to this Biocentrism researcher privately, however, I think I ventured almost too far into the twilight zone when I did. Whatever the case, Lanza definitely explains himself, and it's just a question of whether you can interpret his communications. You can even verify some of what he says for yourself first hand. Once you have done this, it isn't about ideas anymore, it's about direct experience. This doesn't mean it's wise however, because some Christians manage to get permanently high from Bible study, and that is taken as proof for them it's a fact instead of a proposition.
In the world of fantasy, witches don't know why their spells work. What they know is if they rhyme and follow basic mathematical rules, things associated with their content happen, and there seems to be a connection. Because they observe events which correlate with what they've done, they consider there to be a relationship between themselves and these, and the faith they are a witch increases while the doubt they are one decreases. Faith is belief without evidence, and there is none, because there isn't a perceptually accessible link between their action and their result.
In other words, Biocentrism can be experienced at higher levels of comprehension, however this does not mean you should think it's real and not anything else is. All well known texts have yielded results for people, and therefore none of them should be used as evidence to believe the others are not real, because each of them have successfully been made use of by people. Here is where you must learn how to reconcile the fact they all can work for a person in some way. It's certainly the scenario what is metaphysically available is as diverse as these who explore it.