Dear MetaPhlAn2/ HUMAnN2 users and developers,
Thanks a lot for developing and maintaining those tools. I am working on oral microbiome samples using metagenomics (2*~250 nts after quality trimming) and metatranscriptomics (2*~100 nts after quality trimming).
I recently realized that read length should be taken into consideration when using metaphlan2 and humann2 (e.g., https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/humann-users/sensitive-local%7Csort:date/humann-users/UTJMPKaO59w/CLnVREUjAQAJ)
Do you have recommendations for metaphlan2 taxonomical profiling of 250 nts DNA reads?
1- Are the options --min_alignment_len 100 --bt2_ps sensitive-local correct or am I missing some marker genes setting minimum alignment length to 100 nts? Any reason using very-sensitive-local?
With humann2, it is also advised to tune bowtie2 options for the pangenome search to local-mode, and configure translated search to a more relaxed mode --translated-query-coverage-threshold from 90%->50%.
2- I can’t find the argument to define bowtie2 preset in humann2 (v2.8.1). How could I do that?
I am working with metagenomes and metatranscriptomes (human oral sites) and my paired end read after quality trimming are 250 nts and 100 nts long, respectively.
3- Would you advise to use --bt2_ps sensitive-local --min_alignment_len 100 and --translated-query-coverage-threshold 50 for DNA reads 250 nts and keep the default for the 200 nts long RNA reads ?
Thanks a ton.
Florentin
P.S. :Please find a summary of log info for a sample I run with humann2 (default except --prescreen-threshold 0.01 --taxonomic-profile metaphlan2/ ${NAME}*_profile.txt )