Fwd: DCMI Libraries Community Meeting, 14 October 2009, Seoul - DC-Lib AP

[wliu]

在既有MODS又有RDA的情况下，DC-Lib的定位的确比较尴尬。作为DCMI第一个尝试推出的元数据应用刚要，到目前被人质疑它是否”值得推出“，这种尴尬相信参与早期DC-Lib讨论（研发）的人都非常能够体会。
对于Stefanie提出的如下问题，我的看法是DC-Lib应该继续研究，作为RDA的一个简化版本（不一定完全兼容），以及比MODS更符合Web环境数字资源应用（符合DCAM）的方案，应该争取及早推出。
当然对于DC-Lib的用例，是否可以不局限于考虑图书馆本身，而更多地考虑内容出版和消费的产业链业务流，跨界应用的案例。
仅仅是第一反应，供参考。
keven

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ruehle, Stefanie <sru...@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: 2009/10/7
Subject: DCMI Libraries Community Meeting, 14 October 2009, Seoul - DC-Lib AP
To: DC-LIB...@jiscmail.ac.uk


Dear colleagues,

as Christine informed you last week the DCMI Libraries Community will meet
next week in Seoul (14 October, 14:00 - 17:00). One of the issues is the
revision of the Libraries Application Profile. Considering the Singapore
Framework I made a first draft for objectives and scope, functional
requirements and an Entity Relationsship Model and published them in the Task
Group Wiki. You will find these drafts here:

* Objectives and scope:
 http://dublincore.org/librarieswiki/RevisionDraft
* Functional Requirements:
 http://dublincore.org/librarieswiki/FunctionalRequirements
* Entity-Relationship Model:
 http://dublincore.org/librarieswiki/EntityRelationshipModel

I want to discuss these issues and some terms used in the DC Lib AP (see
http://dublincore.org/documents/2004/09/10/library-application-profile/#Title
) in Seoul and hope, that you may join us. Unfortunately some of you won't
come to Seoul. So it would be great if you could send your comments till
Wednesday by this list.

Some questions I had in mind when I worked on the draft:

* objective and scope:
 - Is the information in the draft sufficient?
 - Is it clear why we need DC-Lib - also when DCMI/RDA is on the way?

* Functional Requirements:
 - Are there more use cases and requirements than listed in the draft?
 - Which use cases and requirements are really relevant for the DC-Lib?

* Entity-Relationsship Model:
 - Is the FRBR Model adequate for DC-Lib?
 - Do we need all the relationships I've listed because I found them in the
DC-Lib Terms?
 - What is meant with relationship "has version" and "has format" - do they
mean a horizontal or a vertical relation? Can we use them instead of "is
realized through" and "is embodied in"?
 - Is it ok, when we have no Description Set Profiles for Group 2 and Group
3 of FRBR but only refer to FOAF and SKOS?

I'm looking forward to your comments and an exciting discussion.

    Stefanie

------------------------------------------
Stefanie Rühle
Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek (SUB) Göttingen
Goettingen State and University Library
Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten (KIM)
Platz der Göttinger Sieben 1
37073 Göttingen
Germany
Fon: +49 (0) 551-39-10715
E-Mail: sru...@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Internet: http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de