But in the case of the Philippines, where a self-proclaimed dictator is the most popular presidential candidate and the son of a former dictator could be the first person in the presidential line of succession, the struggle for collective memory is more than just an annual occasion. It remains to be seen how far the memory movement can build on the momentum of the present to reconstruct the past for the future.
You are the dictator of the fictional republic of Ritimba. Your task is to keep everybody happy - the army, the peasants, the land owners.... while secretly filling your personal bank account as much as possible. You've got the secret police on your side... and the guerrillas on the other one.
The media, on the other hand, is not silent. Regular annual programs are dedicated to the People Power Revolution. However, this memorialisation often centres only on Metro Manila as the symbol of national uprising against Marcos rule. The overthrow of the dictatorship was portrayed as an uprising that emerged and centered only on the metropolis.
Without representations from other areas, especially the margins, in the narrative of the defeat of the dictatorship, the official national memory excludes local memories of the same events. The Wall of Remembrance that was set-up to honour the martyrs and heroes who fought against the Marcos dictatorship illustrates the same problem: most of the names listed come from the national urban center, and are part of the professional class. Instead, decentering the memory of the revolution to include local and even contrary, disruptive memories, will create a more inclusive national collective memory and decrease the possibility of another Marcos presidency.
Sadly, though, now I see a forgetful society on every city street. How many homes don American flags? There are days when I notice this and wonder who will stand up and fight when our military is stretched beyond its limits.
aa06259810