There are several reasons for such a change:
* It's easier to see the structure of the narrative, because
each sentence is seen as a "chunk".
* It's easier to move sentences around, because selecting a
line or two is much faster and easier (see Fitt's Law)
than selecting an arbitrary sequence of characters.
* It's easier to merge changes, because only the changed
sentences need to be considered (as opposed to the entire
paragraph).
Making such a change would be a bit painful now, but it will be
almost unthinkable later on. So, we need to make a decision.
-r
--
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume r...@cfcl.com
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7841
Technical editing and writing, programming, and web development
Given that there is a blank line between every pair of paragraphs,
and no blank lines within a paragraph, I don't think we need to
worry about viewing paragraphs as single, cohesive entities. And,
if we don't break at line boundaries, we lose some of the other
benefits of "chunking" the text into sentences.
My personal (admittedly OCD) practice is to add line breaks
at the start of each major clause,
as well as the beginning of each sentence.
This makes the text look a bit choppy,
but I've gotten quite used to it over time.
A possible compromise would be as follows:
* Start each sentence on a new line.
* Fold sentences, if need be, to make them fit within
80-character lines.
-r
--
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume r...@cfcl.com
I've found no problems with normal paragraph text. Other
types of content may, however, take a bit of special care.
For example, each line in a quoted paragraph needs to start
with '>'. So, we may want to leave these oddballs alone...
Until we have a set of guidelines, we'll need to be very
certain to inspect the formatted results we're getting.