What Is Pressure Drop Calculation
Ilene Dycus
The Darcy-Weisbach equation, combined with the Moody chart for calculating head losses in pipes, is traditionally attributed to Henry Darcy, Julius Weisbach, and Lewis Ferry Moody. However, the development of these formulas and charts also involved other scientists and engineers over its historical development. Generally, the Bernoulli's equation would provide the head losses but in terms of quantities not known a priori, such as pressure. Therefore, empirical relationships were sought to correlate the head loss with quantities like pipe diameter and fluid velocity.[3]
Julius Weisbach was certainly not the first to introduce a formula correlating the length and diameter of a pipe to the square of the fluid velocity. Antoine Chzy (1718-1798), in fact, had published a formula in 1770 that, although referring to open channels (i.e., not under pressure), was formally identical to the one Weisbach would later introduce, provided it was reformulated in terms of the hydraulic radius. However, Chzy's formula was lost until 1800, when Gaspard de Prony (a former student of his) published an account describing his results. It is likely that Weisbach was aware of Chzy's formula through Prony's publications.[4]
with α \displaystyle \alpha and β \displaystyle \beta depending on the diameter and the type of pipe wall.[5]Weisbach's work was published in the United States of America in 1848 and soon became well known there. In contrast, it did not initially gain much traction in France, where Prony equation, which had a polynomial form in terms of velocity (often approximated by the square of the velocity), continued to be used. Beyond the historical developments, Weisbach's formula had the objective merit of adhering to dimensional analysis, resulting in a dimensionless friction factor f. The complexity of f, dependent on the mechanics of the boundary layer and the flow regime (laminar, transitional, or turbulent), tended to obscure its dependence on the quantities in Weisbach's formula, leading many researchers to derive irrational and dimensionally inconsistent empirical formulas.[6] It was understood not long after Weisbach's work that the friction factor f depended on the flow regime and was independent of the Reynolds number (and thus the velocity) only in the case of rough pipes in a turbulent flow regime (Prandtl-von Krmn equation).[7]
Figure 1 shows the value of fD as measured by experimenters for many different fluids, over a wide range of Reynolds numbers, and for pipes of various roughness heights. There are three broad regimes of fluid flow encountered in these data: laminar, critical, and turbulent.
is known as the kinematic viscosity. In this expression for Reynolds number, the characteristic length D is taken to be the hydraulic diameter of the pipe, which, for a cylindrical pipe flowing full, equals the inside diameter. In Figures 1 and 2 of friction factor versus Reynolds number, the regime Re < 2000 demonstrates laminar flow; the friction factor is well represented by the above equation.[c]
In laminar flow, friction loss arises from the transfer of momentum from the fluid in the center of the flow to the pipe wall via the viscosity of the fluid; no vortices are present in the flow. Note that the friction loss is insensitive to the pipe roughness height ε: the flow velocity in the neighborhood of the pipe wall is zero.
For Reynolds numbers in the range 2000 < Re < 4000, the flow is unsteady (varies grossly with time) and varies from one section of the pipe to another (is not "fully developed"). The flow involves the incipient formation of vortices; it is not well understood.
When the pipe surface's roughness height ε is significant (typically at high Reynolds number), the friction factor departs from the smooth pipe curve, ultimately approaching an asymptotic value ("rough pipe" regime). In this regime, the resistance to flow varies according to the square of the mean flow velocity and is insensitive to Reynolds number. Here, it is useful to employ yet another dimensionless parameter of the flow, the roughness Reynolds number[14]
Pressure has dimensions of energy per unit volume, therefore the pressure drop between two points must be proportional to the dynamic pressure q. We also know that pressure must be proportional to the length of the pipe between the two points L as the pressure drop per unit length is a constant. To turn the relationship into a proportionality coefficient of dimensionless quantity, we can divide by the hydraulic diameter of the pipe, D, which is also constant along the pipe. Therefore,
Note that the dynamic pressure is not the kinetic energy of the fluid per unit volume,[citation needed] for the following reasons. Even in the case of laminar flow, where all the flow lines are parallel to the length of the pipe, the velocity of the fluid on the inner surface of the pipe is zero due to viscosity, and the velocity in the center of the pipe must therefore be larger than the average velocity obtained by dividing the volumetric flow rate by the wet area. The average kinetic energy then involves the root mean-square velocity, which always exceeds the mean velocity. In the case of turbulent flow, the fluid acquires random velocity components in all directions, including perpendicular to the length of the pipe, and thus turbulence contributes to the kinetic energy per unit volume but not to the average lengthwise velocity of the fluid.
In a hydraulic engineering application, it is typical for the volumetric flow Q within a pipe (that is, its productivity) and the head loss per unit length S (the concomitant power consumption) to be the critical important factors. The practical consequence is that, for a fixed volumetric flow rate Q, head loss S decreases with the inverse fifth power of the pipe diameter, D. Doubling the diameter of a pipe of a given schedule (say, ANSI schedule 40) roughly doubles the amount of material required per unit length and thus its installed cost. Meanwhile, the head loss is decreased by a factor of 32 (about a 97% reduction). Thus the energy consumed in moving a given volumetric flow of the fluid is cut down dramatically for a modest increase in capital cost.
Pressure drop calculations are crucial for ensuring efficient operation and preventing damage to equipment. Whether you're dealing with laminar or turbulent flow, our online calculator provides accurate results.
The friction factor (f) can be determined using several methods, such as the Moody diagram or the Colebrook equation, depending on the pipe roughness interior surface and the Reynolds number of the fluid flowing through the pipe.
It's important to note that the above formula is a simplified version of the pressure drop equation, and there may be other losses (such as fittings, valves, etc.) that need to be considered when calculating the total in a piping system.
The amount of pressure (in psi) lost per foot of pipe depends on several factors, including the pipe diameter (pipe d), the pipe roughness interior surface, the velocity of the fluid flowing through the pipe, the flow rate, and the density of the fluid.
The pressure drop in a pipe depends on several variables, including fluid density, fluid velocity, flow rate, pipe diameter (pipe d), pipe length (pipe l), pipe roughness, fluid viscosity, and acceleration due to gravity.
The pressure drop is the difference in pressure between two points in a system. It is often caused by friction or flow resistance from pipe walls, fittings, or obstructions such as valves. This article discusses the pressure drop formula, its significance, and its effect in various situations.
Pressure drop is the reduction or loss of fluid pressure as it travels through a system. Pressure drop is common in various situations, such as when fluid flows through a pipe, over an orifice, or a valve. This is typically caused by:
The pressure drop in a pipe arises from friction between the fluid and the pipe wall, changes in flow direction, blockages, and alterations in pipe diameter. Pressure drop can be calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach formula. In a pipeline system consisting of multiple pipes, valves, and fittings, the total pressure drop is the sum of the pressure drops in each component.
The Darcy friction factor is primarily determined by the flow type (laminar or turbulent) and the roughness of the pipe's internal surface. It can be obtained using lookup tables, correlations, or software from experimental data.
Substituting these values in the above equation, the pressure drop = 13.5 MPa, which is quite significant. This would require strong, high-quality equipment to withstand the pressure and maintain efficient operation. It also means the pump must generate a pressure significantly above 13.5 MPa to maintain the desired water flow rate. This requires high energy consumption and increases operational costs. Therefore, it is essential to consider pressure drop when designing and operating the system.
In long pipelines, the pressure drop due to friction in the straight pipe is much larger than the pressure drop caused by the fittings and valves. This is because the frictional losses are proportional to the length of the pipe.
As the pipes get shorter, the proportion of the losses due to the fittings and valves gets larger. However, even in a short pipe, the pressure drop due to friction in the straight pipe is still much larger than the pressure drop due to the fittings and valves. This is why the pressure drop caused by the fittings and valves is still called 'minor losses.' While individual minor losses might seem small, they can add up, especially in complex systems with many fittings and turns.
Pressure drop through fittings is calculated using the equivalent length method. The equivalent length method allows the user to describe the pressure loss through a fitting as the length of the pipe. Consider an elbow fitting with a 0.05m diameter. In many pipe material specifications, there are tables that provide the equivalent length for different types of fittings. For example, a standard elbow fitting might have an equivalent length of 30 pipe diameters.
ff7609af8f