Ohh okay I will double check that, but i guess it's because you are in the browser. If you go to the instrument view by closing the browser it should work. It's the first button on the left right from KONTAKT. It would make no sense in that browser view
P.S. and you have to press the leftmost button on top, like 2 windows, to go into complete rack view, then you see those functions, you even can switch them while in browser view but see the difference then in instrument view
Download File ✔ https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://psfmi.com/2yMb62&source=gmail&ust=1719715851328000&usg=AOvVaw1x1Qvr1DA08meMdxGNQLZw
Can you pls make a picture of the window, there is also normally a sign on top rightish, looks like a 3 parted window, if you click on that you can enable or disable, browser, master editor, virtual keyboard and so on.
You are in the mini/single view. Press the rightmost button (with two windows in it) in the header to go back to the rack view. This view is the only one that has the Master panel. This is unchanged from how it was in K6.
Automatic showing of the source volume is optional, but it is not commonly requested, so no graphical user interface was added for it. You can type this line into the Python console (or for changing it permanently, add it to the application startup file):
Thank you very, very much for your help. As a neurosurgeon I work a lot with multiple coregistered volumes, displaying them simultaneously, especially when planning procedures. Unfortunately every time I switched back to the segment editor my dataset view was reset back to the master volume, so I had to recreate my ideal view again and again again, losing a lot of time.
In Wayland, the AppId must match the filename of the .desktop file
The app_id is org.onlyoffice.desktopeditors.desktop
In Appimage and Flatpak version this is correctly set
In the Manjaro respository this is set to onlyoffice.desktop
This should be changed in our respository version.
I changed the .desktop filename to org.onlyoffice.desktopeditors.desktop and it works.
Open the .desktop file in a text editor and find out what the application executable file is called
In this example it was: Exec=/opt/master-pdf-editor-5/masterpdfeditor5 %f
So the executable was masterpdfeditor5
I want to open a PDF file from terminal. I only know the command xdg-open file-name.xxx to open a file. But once I use this command, it opens the PDF file with the Document Viewer application (Evince).
Master PDF Editor provides a binary that you can use to open a file from the terminal. Supposing that you have installed the latest version of Master PDF Editor (version 5.9.40 currently), the binary is masterpdfeditor5, so you can open a PDF file using:
Typically, an application will allow to open a file from the command line by providing the file name as an argument to the command for running the application. I am not familiar with the proprietary application "Master PDF Editor", but for many applications, it can simply work like:
Other answers have shown how to do this, but I'll explain how you can do this for any program. Assuming you have Master PDF editor installed, it'll probably be on your path. You can start typing a command in the terminal and hit Tab to get autocomplete. For example, I typed master and then hit Tab, and it completes to masterpdfeditor4 (I have an older version). It might also give you multiple options if there are more than 1 programs that start with master.
It is not uncommon to have several Tabular models in an organisation, with a substantial amount of functional overlap. For the development team, keeping these models up to date with shared features can be a pain point. In this article, we'll see an alternate approach that may be suitable in situations where it makes sense to combine all these models into a single "Master" model, that is then deployed partially into several different subset models. Tabular Editor enables this approach by utilising perspectives in a special way (while still allowing perspectives to work the usual way).
Disclaimer: While this technique works, it is not supported by Microsoft, and there is a fair amount of learning, scripting and hacking involved. Decide for yourself whether you think it's the right approach for your team.
Let's say that for some reason, these is a need to deploy everything relating to Internet Sales as one model, and everything relating to Reseller Sales as another. This could be for security reasons, performance, scalability, or maybe even because your team is servicing a number of external clients, where each client needs their own copy of the model, containing both shared and specific functionality.
Instead of actually maintaining one development branch for each of the different versions, the technique presented here, lets you maintain just one model using metadata to indicate how the model should be split upon deployment.
The idea is quite simple. Start by adding a number of new perspectives to your model, corresponding to the number of target models you need to deploy to. Make sure to prefix these perspectives in a consistent way, to separate them from user-oriented perspectives:
Here, we use a $-sign as the prefix on the perspective names. Later on we will see how these perspectives are stripped from the model, so that end users will not see them. They are only used by the model developers.
Now, simply add all objects needed in the individual models to these perspectives. Use the Perspective dropdown in Tabular Editor to confirm that a model contains the necessary objects. Here's a handy script that can be used to ensure that all dependencies are included in the perspective as well:
Explanation: First, the script loops through all hierarchies in the current perspective (the perspective currently selected in the dropdown at the top of the screen). For every such hierarchy, it ensures that all columns used as hierarchy levels appear in the perspective. Next, the script loops through all columns and measures of the current perspective. For each of these objects, all DAX dependencies in the form of measure-, column- or table references are also included in the perspective. Please note that expressions such as DISTINCTCOUNT('Customer'[CustomerId]) will result in all columns of the 'Customer' table being included in the perspective, as Tabular Editor treats such an expression as having a dependency both on the [CustomerId] column itself, and on the 'Customer' table. Lastly, the script ensures that any columns that are used as a "Sort By"-column, are also included in the perspective.
By the way, if you want to make a copy of a perspective, you can already do that through the UI. Click on the "Perspectives" node in the explorer tree, and then click the ellipsis button in the property grid:
If you're a team of developers working on the model, you should already be using Tabular Editors "Save to Folder" functionality together with a source control environment such as Git. Make sure to check the "Serialize perspectives per-object" option under "File" > "Preferences" > "Save to Folder", to avoid getting heaps of merge conflicts on your perspective definitions.
By now, you've probably guessed that we're going to use scripting to create one version of the model for every of our prefixed developer perspectives. The script will simply remove all objects from the model, that are not included in a given developer perspective. However, before we do that, there are a couple more situations we need to handle.
Some objects, such as perspectives, data sources and roles, are not included nor excluded from perspectives themselves, but we may still need a way to specify which of our model versions they should belong to. For this, we're going to use annotations. So going back to our Adventure Works model, we may want the "Inventory" and "Internet Operation" perspectives to appear in "$InternetModel" and "$ManagementModel", while "Reseller Operation" should appear in "$ResellerModel" and "$ManagementModel".
When adding new user perspectives to the model, remember to add the same annotation and provide the names of the developer perspectives that you want the user perspective included in. When scripting the final model versions later on, we will use the information in these annotations to include the perspectives needed. We can do the same thing for data sources and roles.
There may also be situations where the same measure should have slightly different expressions or format strings across the different model versions. Again, we can use annotation to provide the metadata per developer perspective, and then apply the metadata when we script out the final model.
The idea is that we create one annotation for each of the properties we would like to maintain different versions of, per developer perspective. If you need to maintain other properties than those shown in the script (Expression, FormatString, Description) separately, just add them to the script. You can do the same thing for other object types, but it probably won't make sense for much other than measures and perhaps calculated columns and partitions (to maintain different query expressions per model version, for example).
Use your new custom actions to apply model version specific changes to the developer perspectives (or add the annotations by hand). For example, in our Adventure Works sample, we want the [Day Count] measure to have a different expression in the $ResellerModel perspective, so we apply the changes to the measure, and invoke the "Save Metadata as Annotations" action while having selected the "$ResellerModel" perspective in the dropdown:
7fc3f7cf58