fun4alll
unread,Jun 7, 2013, 7:10:53 PM6/7/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to memphisfreeth...@googlegroups.com
I know you've read 'the bell curve', which suggests that a portion of the difference is organic. However, I'll have you know that most technologists such as myself, people that have over a dozen patents of my own, often consider Japanese inventions as highly derivative. They blend together ideas of others, and are reasonably clever, but not at all creative. Yes, if you count patents, the Japanese are way ahead, and if you count Nobel prizes, they are way way behind.
Their culture values competence in math and science. In fact, their young wear glasses that are straight glass... No perscription lenses; they do it to look smart. Now, there is a difference in cultural values! Yes, they are competent, but by the standards of other advanced nations, they are not creative. Interesting that you chose that word...
Creativity is difficult to measure. Nevertheless, the strong consensis is that china and Japan are skilled at being efficient at leveraging ideas made by others, but can you list an innovative base technology that originated there? The transistor, fm comminication, radar, sonar, muscular power.... No no no, they build good cars and and DVD players. That's not as creative as you imagine from my vantage point. Competence without creativity; that's how I'd describe them IMHO.