memcache Vs memcached

476 views
Skip to first unread message

Paras

unread,
Apr 14, 2009, 10:52:52 PM4/14/09
to memcached
Hello all,

I am just begining to use memcached. I came accross pecl and there I
saw 2 caching extensions. memcached and memcache. Which one should I
use ???

Thanks,
Paras

张志坚

unread,
Apr 14, 2009, 11:15:29 PM4/14/09
to memc...@googlegroups.com
Memcached need PHP Version: PHP version 6.0.0 or older or PHP Version: PHP 5.2.0 or newer
Memcache need PHP Version: PHP 4.3.11 or newer PEAR Package: PEAR Installer 1.4.0b1 or newer

Suggest to use Memcache. Memcached is still a beta version
2009/4/15 Paras <ppa...@gmail.com>



--
2009 | 新的旅程

NICK VERBECK

unread,
Apr 14, 2009, 11:45:33 PM4/14/09
to memc...@googlegroups.com
Doesn't the memcached version use libmemcached where the other is more pure php?

2009/4/14 张志坚 <leslee...@gmail.com>:

--
Nick Verbeck - NerdyNick
----------------------------------------------------
NerdyNick.com
SkeletalDesign.com
VivaLaOpenSource.com
Coloco.ubuntu-rocks.org

Marc Bollinger

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 1:24:09 AM4/15/09
to memc...@googlegroups.com
PECL extensions are C-based, unlike PEAR extensions, but you're right that the PECL memcached client is basically a PHP wrapper over libmemcached, while PECL's memcache client is hand-rolled. I don't keep track of issues with either client, but the 'beta' designation wouldn't hold me back from using the former because of its association with libmemcached.

- Marc

2009/4/14 NICK VERBECK <nerd...@gmail.com>

gf

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 3:58:59 PM4/15/09
to memcached
Hi. memcached is much better. Trust me :-) I've experienced in using
both.

Paras

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 11:22:05 PM4/15/09
to memcached
Thanks guys.... I got some really good answers from you.

Paras
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages