Download Business Proposal Season 1 [REPACK]
Maggie Schnair
In spite of the ongoing rumors, neither Netflix nor members of the cast have confirmed these speculations. Due to this reason, it is very uncertain to confirm the production of a second season for the beloved K-drama. It looks like the plot of a romance between a boss and his employee has turned to be common for most streamable K-dramas on Netflix, which means that this could pose an obstacle for the platform moving forward.
Still, fans keep on fighting for a second season, as they consider that the story has potential for a continuation and Netflix should use this possibility to its advantage to finally start producing it once and for all!
Her podcast was featured in our post, 9 stellar small business podcasts handpicked by small business owners, and she kindly contributed to a more recent blog post too: 6 success-killing features of a bad podcast pitch.
We originally started out as a wedding business-to-business podcast, because at the time we were both in the wedding industry, and Rachel (as an avid business podcast listener) had noticed a gap in the market for that very specific industry positioning.
Customers paid one price for access to all of the content our guests had made available, and it ended up being a 29 ticket for over 800+ worth of incredible business stuff. It felt like the perfect culmination of 4 years of podcasting so far.
The South Korean show Business Proposal continues to be one of the most successful shows globally. Business Proposal premiered on Netflix and starred Ahn Hyo-seop,Kim Se-jeong, Seol In-ah, and Kim Min-gue in lead roles. The K-drama was created by Park Seon-ho,Han Sul-hee,Hong Bo-hui. After 12 episodes, the show came to a happy end but the characters and the actors continue to be showered with love. They had a mini-reunion recently and Se-jeong shared selfies with Hyo-seop which literally left fans in a frenzy. advertisementBUSINESS PROPOSAL FANS IN FOR A SURPRISEIn the selfie, the duo is seen posing happily and fans were not prepared for this surprise. The two met to shoot for an ad together. As soon as the post was dropped, fans wrote, "We need business proposal season 2." Another wrote, "APA INI?SEASON 2????" Check it out. View this post on Instagram A post shared by áÄá µáÆáÄá æáÄá åáÆ (@clean_0828)ABOUT BUSINESS PROPOSAL
Understanding the outline and format for a proposal is the first step in crafting a great business proposal. Along with that, you also need to avoid these 9 fetal business proposal mistakes to impress your clients and win them over.
When you have a loosely structured proposal, you may end up writing several paragraphs building your case and by that time, the reader would have lost interest in what really matters, i.e. your actual pitch.
To avoid such basic business proposal mistakes, focus on writing a crisp, engaging, and well-structured business proposal like the one here which packs all the essential elements of a good proposal in just three pages.
If you are feeling creative enough, you can even try some of the good online video makers listed in this Attrock post and create a stellar business proposal video. You can experiment with a simple explainer video format to test whether your clients like it or not.
Failing to provide all the required details is one of the fatal business proposal mistakes you should avoid. Your proposal should be packed with all the essential details to educate, engage, and convince the clients to do business with you.
At the same time, one of the common business proposal mistakes to avoid is giving out too much information. Instead, find a middle ground where you provide just the right amount of information to highlight the value you bring and take the talks to the next level.
It is possible that you would have prepared a business proposal in a hurry and could not proofread it thoroughly. Imagine what impression the client would have of you when they see those typos, grammatical errors, or formatting errors.
There are several tools like Grammarly that can correct spelling and grammatical errors, and suggest changes to improve content clarity and tone. Such tools can help you write professional and error-free business proposal copy without breaking a sweat.
The solution is to personalize your business proposal for each client and propose solutions that are specifically developed for them. And even if you have to reuse content, you need to update it before including it in a fresh proposal.
Writing a business proposal can be fun if you learn to avoid common business proposal mistakes. Today business owners, as well as freelancers, can use good business proposal builders to create professional and impressive proposals quickly.
While John Chevedden and shareholders associated with him submitted by far the highest number of shareholder proposals for 2014 shareholder meetings, there were several other proponents that were reported to have submitted at least 20 proposals. These proponents were the New York State Common Retirement Fund (54), New York City Pension Funds (48), the AFL-CIO (25), Trillium Asset Management LLC (23), the United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund (22), and Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (21).
Shareholder proponents withdrew approximately 19% of the proposals submitted for 2014 shareholder meetings to date, a decrease as compared to approximately 28% of the proposals submitted for 2013 meetings and approximately 26% of the proposals submitted for 2012 meetings (as of comparable times during both years).
During the 2014 proxy season, companies submitted fewer no-action requests to the Staff as compared to the previous proxy season. The following table summarizes the responses to no-action requests that the Staff issued between October 1, 2013 and May 31, 2014, and during the same period in 2012-2013:
Most shareholder proposals voted on at 2014 shareholder meetings did not receive majority support. Based on the 432 shareholder proposals for which ISS provides voting results, proposals averaged support of 32.5% of votes cast. Five proposal topics that received high shareholder support, including three that averaged majority support, were:
Based on the 432 shareholder proposals for which ISS provides voting results for 2014 shareholder meetings, 14.8% received support from a majority of votes cast, compared to 19.2% in 2013 (as of a comparable time last year). The table below shows the principal topics addressed in proposals that received a majority of votes cast at a number of companies:
Many companies implemented proposals that they received and thus either negotiated a withdrawal of the proposal or were able to exclude the proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(10) as substantially implemented. This season, 174 proposals were withdrawn, with 59 of those withdrawals occurring after the companies submitted their no-action requests. Nineteen proposals were excluded as substantially implemented, as the companies either took steps to implement the proposals or elaborated on how they already had implemented the proposals.
Over the past few years there have been numerous shareholder proposals requesting that a company take various actions to maximize shareholder value, including: requests that the board break up the company or divest the company of specific assets; conduct a sale, merger, or liquidation of the company; engage an advisor to evaluate alternative strategies for the company that could maximize shareholder value; and issue dividends to return capital to shareholders.
The developments discussed above demonstrate the continued complexity of the shareholder proposal process, particularly when litigation is involved. Some lessons that companies should keep in mind as they begin to look toward 2015 include:
This selectivity on the part of companies may have created the misleading impression that the Staff was more willing to grant no-action requests this year. Although the overall environment for shareholder proposal no-action relief remains challenging and, in many cases, unpredictable, there are some important takeaways to be gleaned from the 2023 season.
Practice point: In many of these instances, the Staff concurred with the company that the proposal related to an ordinary business matter even though the proponent portrayed the proposal as relating to a broader social policy matter.
Companies must carefully consider the phrasing of proposals, as the question of whether a proposal focuses on an ordinary business matter or a significant policy issue can vary even among seemingly similar proposals. For example, in the 2023 season, two financial services companies faced proposals concerning merchant code categorization of transactions involving firearms and related goods.
Notably, the latter proposal concerned whether the company should refrain from tracking firearms sales, with the proponent claiming in the proposal that tracking such sales could impinge Second Amendment rights. As a result, the Staff may have determined that, while the proposals related to the same topic, they were focused on fundamentally different considerations, and a significant social policy issue was present in one but not the other.
Since publication of SLB 14L, the Staff has denied no-action relief for most proposals focusing on human capital management issues, but it has granted relief in some circumstances, leaving the contours of this aspect of the ordinary business exclusion unclear. For example:
Practice point: It remains unclear when a proposal relating to employees transcends ordinary business matters, but companies should continue to carefully scrutinize these types of proposals.
Companies were slightly more successful in excluding proposals under the micromanagement prong of the ordinary business exclusion in the 2023 season than in the previous season. SLB 14L explained that, in analyzing micromanagement arguments, the Staff will consider the level of granularity sought in the proposal and to what extent, if any, it inappropriately limits discretion of the board or management.
356178063d