Over the last few years, the statistical programming language R has become an integral part of the curricula of econometrics classes we teach at the University of Duisburg-Essen. We regularly found that a large share of the students, especially in our introductory undergraduate econometrics courses, had not been exposed to any programming language before and thus had difficulty to engage with learning R on their own. With little background in statistics and econometrics, beginners naturally have a hard time understanding the benefits of having R skills for learning and applying econometrics. These particularly include the ability to conduct, document and communicate empirical studies and having the ability to program simulation studies which is helpful for, e.g., comprehending and validating theorems which usually are not easily grasped by mere brooding over formulas. Being applied economists and econometricians, we value and wish to share with our students all of these capabilities.
We thank the Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft e.V. and the Ministry of Culture and Science of North Rhine-Westphalia for their financial support. Also, we are grateful to Alexander Blasberg for proofreading and his effort in helping with programming the exercises.A special thanks goes to Achim Zeileis (University of Innsbruck) and Christian Kleiber (University of Basel) for their advice and constructive criticism. Another thanks goes to Rebecca Arnold from the Münster University of Applied Sciences for several suggestions regarding the website design and for providing us with her nice designs for the book cover, logos and icons. We are also indebted to all past students of our introductory econometrics courses at the University of Duisburg-Essen for their feedback.
I got my master's in applied economics. Did great in all the other classes but somehow, I struggled with econometrics. Unfortunately we used Stock & Watson, which I've heard from people here that it is insufficient for a graduate level econometrics. That was the mandatory text while wooldridge was only recommended. I don't know why that is *shrug*. I also did not find the book to be that great at explaining things.
I haven't used econometrics in about a year but I want to get a career in analytics that does predicative analytics and forecasting. That could be maybe risk analysis, financial forecasting, market analysis, etc. So I want to do some refresher on things to make sure I brush up on things I forgot. How well does this book explain things? I have heard good things about it though.
Mark W. Watson Princeton University
Mark Watson is the Howard Harrison and Gabrielle Snyder Beck Professor of Economics and Public Affairs at Princeton University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the Econometric Society. His research focuses on time-series econometrics, empirical macroeconomics, and macroeconomic forecasting. He has published articles in these areas and is the author (with James Stock) of Introduction to Econometrics, a leading undergraduate textbook. Watson has served on the editorial board of several journals including the American Economic Review, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Econometrica, the Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, the Journal of Monetary Economics, and Macroeconomic Dynamics. He currently serves as a Co-Editor of the Review of Economics and Statistics. Before coming to Princeton in 1995, Watson served on the economics faculty at Harvard and Northwestern. Watson did his undergraduate work at Pierce Junior College and California State University at Northridge, and completed his Ph.D. at the University of California at San Diego.
This project aims to provide students with an e-learning arrangement which seamlessly intertwines theoretical core knowledge and empirical skills in undergraduate econometrics. Of course, the focus is on empirical applications with R. Our goal is to enable students not only to learn how results of case studies can be replicated with R but we also intend to strengthen their ability in using the newly acquired skills in other empirical applications. This is supported by interactive end-of-chapter R programming exercises and interactive visualizations.
Ensure students grasp the relevance of econometrics with Introduction to Econometrics -- the text that connects modern theory and practice with motivating, engaging applications. The 4th Edition maintains a focus on currency, while building on the philosophy that applications should drive the theory, not the other way around. The text incorporates real-world questions and data, and methods that are immediately relevant to the applications. With very large data sets increasingly being used in economics and related fields, a new chapter dedicated to Big Data helps students learn about this growing and exciting area. This coverage and approach make the subject come alive for students and helps them to become sophisticated consumers of econometrics.
In keeping with their successful introductory econometrics text, Stock and Watson motivate each methodological topic with a real-world policy application that uses data, so that students apply the theory immediately. Introduction to Econometrics, Brief Edition, is a streamlined version of their text, including the fundamental topics, an early review of statistics and probability, the core material of regression with cross-sectional data, and a capstone chapter on conducting empirical analysis.
Ensure your students grasp the essential principles of Econometrics with a comprehensive introduction to the field. Introduction to Econometrics, 4th Edition, Global Edition is the ultimate introduction to the field.
This dissertation studies two important stock market anomalies, the correlation between stock returns and inflation and the predictability of stock returns. Chapter 1 is an introduction. Chapter 2 investigates why the stock return-inflation relation changes over time. Kaul (1987) considers changes in the monetary policy regime, while Hess and Lee (1999) propose changes in the composition of structural shocks. I show in Chapter 2: (1) different from Kaul (1987) and Hess and Lee (1999), both changes in the monetary policy regime and changes in the composition of structural shocks can in principle cause changes in the stock return-inflation relation; (2) empirically, the change in the monetary policy regime is quantitatively more important in explaining the data. In Chapter 3, I propose a new test that is particularly powerful against the type of alternative proposed by the recent behavioral models. When the test is applied to the data, I find evidence supporting the behavioral models in that (1) prices of stocks with more uncertainty and slower information diffusion tend to have both short-run positive and long-run negative autocorrelations; (2) the three-factor model cannot explain all observed autocorrelation patterns. The results are not likely due to data mining, because similar autocorrelation patterns are found in different sets of portfolios, different stock markets, different sample periods, and even for using different intervals to measure autocorrelations. Motivated by the same behavioral models and the contradictory empirical evidence regarding the stock price reaction to the common factor, in Chapter 4, I propose a regression-based test that is robust to serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in stock returns. When the test is used to the data, contrary to Lewellen (2002), I find evidence in support of the behavioral models in that stock prices also short run under- and long-run overreact to market wide information.
Zaremba, A., Kizys, R., Aharon, D.Y., Demir, E. (2020). Infected arkets: Novel coronavirus, government interventions, and stock return volatility around the globe. Finance Research Letters, 101597 (forthcoming),
N2 - This paper examines whether environmental and social (ES) activities affect the resiliency of firms during the COVID-19 crisis. We study a sample of 330 firms operating in five developed countries: Canada, France, Japan, the UK and the US. Our analysis shows that US firms with a high ES ranking experienced a significantly lower stock price range volatility during the Covid stock market rundown of February-March 2020. Such findings also hold for Japanese firms but only later on after the introduction of government support. In terms of returns, compared to their peers with a low ES ranking, Japanese and UK stock prices with a high ES ranking suffered more during and after the market rundown. For other countries, we do not find significant differences in stock price behavior based on ES ratings. Our findings suggest that engaging with ES activities is not associated with a better or worse performance during crisis times, which has important implications for investors and managers.
AB - This paper examines whether environmental and social (ES) activities affect the resiliency of firms during the COVID-19 crisis. We study a sample of 330 firms operating in five developed countries: Canada, France, Japan, the UK and the US. Our analysis shows that US firms with a high ES ranking experienced a significantly lower stock price range volatility during the Covid stock market rundown of February-March 2020. Such findings also hold for Japanese firms but only later on after the introduction of government support. In terms of returns, compared to their peers with a low ES ranking, Japanese and UK stock prices with a high ES ranking suffered more during and after the market rundown. For other countries, we do not find significant differences in stock price behavior based on ES ratings. Our findings suggest that engaging with ES activities is not associated with a better or worse performance during crisis times, which has important implications for investors and managers.
aa06259810