The Goal Statement is as follows: To create a hardcopy Patient laboratory
result report that includes historical data which is easier to read and
interpret results.
We are Critical Access hospital which was express installed July 2004. We
are presently running Meditech Magic 5.61. Although we encourage our
in-house physicians to use PCI, the focus of this report is our many
referring physicians. We are asking for example reports from any hospitals
willing to share. The most cumbersome problem is the footnoting which
occurs with notes when printing the most recent result with 4 previous for
comparison. Any assistance you could provide would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Eaton Rapids Medical Center
Mark A Rodge, CCP
CIO/Information Services Director
====================================
Keep up to date on recent announcements about MUSE by visiting the meditech-l web site at MTUsers.net and go to the tab labeled "MUSE - Dallas 05/08"
If you want to ask a question from the meditech-l users who will be attending MUSE or share something about MUSE with each other, you can post messages on the web site on the tab "MUSE - Dallas 05/08"
Something happened to one of my external Lab reports so that I cannot get the right footnote on the report with the perform Lab site name and address.
If it's offsite the footnote works, but I can't seem to get the Lab's name and address to appear for our ML. How are you getting your inhouse lab name and
address just like the offsite footnote prints?
So simple but I can't get it.
Thanks,
Maura
Maura J. Hoag
Contra Costa Health Services
Information Systems Specialist
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
So other sites have a different header fragment, which shows if report pulled from that location.
>>> <mh...@hsd.cccounty.us> 06/05/08 12:10 PM >>>
Good Morning -
Thanks,
Maura
====================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer and any network to which your computer is connected.
Maybe you need the DTS below? We had similar trouble and this is
supposed to fix, but I haven't tested yet...
************************************************************************
*************
DTS: LAB #14368
Description: LIS: Correct lab sites used when printing lab site specific
broadcast
Release: 5.5
5.6 - #1306
Previously in LAB, when you defined different performing sites for two
different tests and defined different reports for each of these lab
sites in
the LIS Lab Site Dictionary, if you ordered and resulted the tests above
at a
priority defined to autobroadcast for a patient with a location that had
a
Broadcast Device defined, then the system did not always use the correct
report
format for its lab site when printing a broadcast report.
This has been corrected. When you define different performing sites for
two
different tests and define different reports for each of these lab sites
in the
LIS Lab Site Dictionary, if you order and result the tests above at a
priority
defined to autobroadcast for a patient with a location that has a
Broadcast
Device defined, now the system uses the correct report format for its
lab site
when printing a broadcast report.
************************************************************************
***********
Ruth Ready
Clinical Systems Analyst
Arkansas Childrens Hospital
501-364-6534, pager 501-681-2009
Good Morning -
Thanks,
Maura
====================================
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you.