Ok. I read the problems and concerns section and the media plan section of the project. We have to point out 1-2 problems in each campaign to explain why they are ineffective and then make recommendations to fix them in the media plan.
Texting Campaign Problem
The campaign has been ineffective because of a lack of targeting:
- The age group with the greatest proportion of distracted drivers was the under-20 age group (16%). The age group with the next greatest
proportion of distracted drivers was the 20-to-29-year-old age group at 13 percent. (
distraction.gov/stats-and-facts/)
- NHTSA reports distracted driving fatalities doubled from 2007 to 2009 in Nevada, from 2.7% to 5.4%.
- from 2007 to 2009- almost 11% of all Nevada crashes were in the 16-20 age range (NDOT Crash Report)
-paired with the 21-25 age group- 25% of all Nevada automobile crashes (NDOT Crash Report)
Conclusion: The 20 & under age group has the greatest percentage of distracted driving accidents. In Nevada, distracted driving doubled from 2007-2009 and this age group totaled about 11% of all Nevada accidents in that period. Paired with the 21-25 age group, this group accounted for 25% of the automobile accidents in Nevada from 2007-2009. The campaign has been ineffective because it is trying to reach a large age group, rather than focusing on the primary offenders.
Texting Campaign Recommendations (Media Plan)
-Utilize media that reaches Nevada high school students and college students that are continuing their distracted driving habits.
- Use social media to engage this technologically savvy market and drive traffic to the NDOT website and online information tools.
Let me know if this makes sense or if I am way off.
Jerret