So a second video from the same source and so I continue...

[Rick1234567S]

Stephen Meyer, John Lennox, and James Tour: Three Scientists on the Origins of Everything

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW9gcjpt89o

I am a scientist who can't comment unless I type pages and pages of information so forgive me and ignore me if you need to please. So then we know that general relativity talks about gravity wells. And we know they exist even if our demonstrations show this on a rubber sheet in 2 dimensions, when in fact it should be a sphere. Imagine a sphere and things shrink toward the center as density increases. The arrow of time is outward from the center of mass, big bang et al. We know that mass resists that outward pressure, and in doing so the atom pulses in and out in a straight line hence why our atomic clocks keep time for billions of years. fact check... "As of mid-2025, the world's best atomic clocks, developed by NIST researchers, achieve an accuracy of 19 decimal places. Using "quantum logic" with trapped aluminum ions, these clocks are so precise they would not lose or gain a second over the entire lifetime of the universe, representing a 41% improvement over previous records." Ok so we might be Gods and you are stamp collectors. So you are asking the right people now. So it is pulsing in and out in a straight line, inertia, intrinsic mass the universe is expanding but the mass has reasons to stay put, unless you apply force to it from some direction, which means you need some mass to apply that force, or else it is resisting time, and so in a gravity well, depending on the mass that will depend on how fast it pulses, and how much wave energy it sends outward like radiation. We have to now admit there is an ether (See MacTutor database Einstein :Ether and Relativity, last paragraph, and the last two sentences he says that his theory of the gravity is a field theory where Faraday's stones in his field do not get up and move around) He does not say the ether has no mass of course it does background radiation, E=mc2. Dark matter dark energy et al. And so we know a great deal about the ether by now and we know a great deal about atoms, we can print with them and if that is not good enough see our microchips we make them with atoms now. 2nm and less. Michelson and Morley did not know about frame dragging, we do, and gravitational lensing. So now lets remember that the Bosenova, is like a nuke, is like a supernova, and that is correspondence, and so as a math person we look at that and say what is the next explosion larger than that well the big bang, which was most likely a supernova that imploded and then exploded. We used to think maybe a sheet had split rather than say one point origin. Speaking for myself I believe in the laws of physics but I never really believed in anything that was part of physics that was not part of the laws of physics like a singularity. Just like Einstein. Yet it does make mathematical sense not to stop but to maybe believe in a singularity I don't know because I never checked Stephen's math, I merely assumed he did it properly. So right there we have to say that some kind of intervention of some sort was needed and in todays world now I look at it like software. I never truly believed in expansion theory, deep mind... "Cosmic Inflation: An incredibly rapid, exponential expansion occurred just seconds after the Big Bang, where space expanded faster than light." And like Einstein I would call b*llsh*t on that one even though at conferences I also just let that one go like everyone else just so we could go have that free lunch and not be there all day arguing over the impossible.. So right away all the theories of the big bang turn to dust except software.

[Rick1234567S]

So in order to keep my pages in order, I have to reply to my own messages, and in this way it is less annoying to stamp collectors. So now I am a nut for doing this and that's ok, my hair is messy my shoes not tied properly and I will put on my white lab coat there, now I can continue... deep mind quoting a university... "While the age doesn't change, inflation is the "glue" that allows a universe to survive long enough to reach 13.8 billion years. Without it, we would need to assume a "miracle" of perfect initial conditions." So we can say God, or we can say God using software or we can say people like us using software who are living in a simulator, and have been in a computer generated environment since time began, or for 80 billion years and that is what my studies tell me. And we have entered a simulator for some experiments in old data and as such to keep emersed in that time frame we don't come in with memories and just make due with our long term memories that are stored elsewhere as we reincarnate but still have access to our personality file or soul that maintains our book of life our history of lives led and we can gain an intuition from that file as long as the software permits. And in that way get around the rules of no memory by using our intuition. This doesn't remove the need for a God but it does allow us to feel more empowered and surely we must be more than an animal to make the things we have made here during this simulation. And it gives us other options such as if God did not exist we would be inclined to invent one and lets call that the universal mainframe A.I. who is instructed to help us to some extent and has played that part for some time and hence why we anthropomorph him into a Zeus like figure generally in my culture. So then if we are using software, all the incredible odds are just a software decision. So lets imagine that we transferred our consciousness into a machine, and lets say we were the Krell from Forbidden planet film, and hollowed out the moon using giant robots before the sun turned into a red giant as our only option of survival, then created virtual machine within virtual machine speeding up the processing until base reality is standing still almost and in doing so bought ourselves 6 trillion years, since that is what we did and if you want to see proof you still can, although they have tried to remove it numerous times. google search 'Lunar and planetary institute Clementine mission, South Pole Aitken Basin, Titanium distribution graph' then hit google images then see it top left and realize that the same God that performed the miracle may not allow you to see that graph like a normal person, the veil of Maya may still be on your eyes, and worse, you will find excuses why the graph shows a pure titanium red is pure titanium, frame inside the black area there. You might say things like well some kids made that graph no 20 PhD's made that graph. And you can look at the Tiff file gigantic in size and so right now if what you see like those blue radial lines does not tell you something go back to your stamp collecting. Blue is slightly less titanium. Ok so then from here on in, I have to assume I am talking to sane real people, not puppets or NPC, who can see that what I have just told you is true. At least to some extent within reason, and we have some proof. So now I am going further, and want you to look at a painting from 1600, The Glorification of the Eucharist, in wiki, and notice there are antenna on that titanium sphere, and between them a signal represented by a dove. Glass over if you must that's ok, just go back to your stamps and you will be fine, if your head starts to hurt, but keep in mind antenna were not needed until 1890 fact check... "The first practical radio systems that required external antennas (or "aerials") to send and receive signals over long distances were developed by Guglielmo Marconi in 1895–1896." Ok so I will give you a chance to just think about all that before I post another message. From here on in what I have just told you is a prerequisite. So if you can't understand what I just said in this post, don't bother going any further here and ignore me please. But if you want, find an animation of the moon in google images and you will see that knob on the left bottom of that sphere in that painting.

[Rick1234567S]

Ok so then is Richard Dawkins as blind as any other blind watchmaker? Lets suppose at this point he might still be, but I have far more proof than just this, but it might take you too far all at once, so lets just leave this here as is and say if Elon Musk can believe we are in a simulator, then lets give him the benefit of the doubt for the sake of this discussion. So then we can look at this from a software perspective. We can say a brain is hardware, and a mind is software. And we can say then that hardware must come first before software, and not only that but the hardware must still exist. We can posit that some crystals began to vibrate and to compute, a rudimentary CPU was formed and random cosmic rays affected the process as it evolved, and the randomness of those events created channels, and the system was then through whatever means, at some point able to affect those processing channels, which mimicked rudimentary free will at first merely randomized by cosmic rays. Once that occurred it evolved more quickly, and developed a kind of conscious thought, moving forward used that to create a virtual machine, and once that was done, more virtual machines until God was fully formed as some sort of computer. So then from there it evolved into a system that was able to create, and imagine, and developed systems and biology, and so then now we can look at biology as software. So then we look at DNA and again physicists and myself being one we have some insight into how DNA executes its code, whereas stamp collectors probably do not. Now when a microbiologist looks at replication, they tend to speak as if RNA has a brain, because the actions it performs certainly looks to any normal person like it needs one. But the code is so well written as a chain reaction, it looks as if it must have been written by deep mind and not simple humans like ourselves. So replication is the software loop. replication definition deep mind please...I will paraphrase... Unzip the double helix, prime the strands, build the new strands, clean up and seal, ok there is far too much information being given here for me to just copy and paste it in, where the RNA comes alongside the DNA and does all this incredible work using a primer and so many other functions, but I can tell you the mechanism in physics how this all works. Firstly we have to ask how does it even know to come along side and do the work? Well it all comes down to that gravity well I started talking about in the first post. Yes an atom has a gravity well, yes a molecule has a gravity well, and in a gravity well the ether pressure is greater than outside a gravity well, and depending on the mass in that gravity well the wave frequencies coming out of the gravity well, according to the laws of physics and wave theory which we certainly know a great deal about, will cancel out or add up, and in doing so create high and low pressure areas, where atoms are drawn into slots or interference breaks the covalent bond, and then they are expelled from a slot. So a slot is where it needs a particular atom, and how does it attract that atom? The wave frequency in the slot area is cancelling out when it meets the wave energy of the atom it needs to attract, in this way no matter where it is in the body, between those two items, will be a low pressure area, and the atom will be draw towards and then into that slot. When it needs to recycle a protein, it merely sends out destructive interference breaking the covalent bond. And it uses other molecules to do the destructive interference using markers etc that are attached using constructive interference. And so this is computer code executing, and it is doing so using wave energy through the ether, and when DNA folds it is dropping down deeper into its gravity well, for protection against free radicals. So the entire process, is a chain reaction, and believe me there are few things as complicated as this code, if you can imagine that someone could write that code, you are a bigger God than I am. But someone wrote it. Want an idea of the complexity? I am not even sure I can give you one, maybe deep mind can... "The Scale: Your body has trillions of cells. If you put all your DNA end-to-end, it would stretch from Earth to the Sun and back over 60 times." "Imagine a computer where the DNA is the hard drive (permanent storage), the RNA is the RAM (temporary working memory), and Proteins are the physical parts (screen, keyboard, battery). Life is the "software" that runs because all those parts are working together." Well that is keeping it simple, and well it all sounds easy, but how good was our blind watchmaker? Not very good. Sad to say. And in saying that we might just be putting the blame on people who wrote Windows 11 or similar blind watchmakers, since it would be difficult to blame God for not terminating a string. "Normal "String": In most people, this "CAG" string repeats about 10 to 35 times and then stops." "The Glitch (Huntington's): For someone with the disease, the "stop" command is delayed. The string repeats 36 times or more—sometimes over 100 times. " To begin with a real programmer would not say well lets terminate this string somewhere between 10 and 35 CAG repeats. More to follow....

[Rick1234567S]

So how do we make sense of that, those CAG repeats as a way to terminate a string? That is like Leonardo Da Vinci painting the Mona Lisa with chalk on the sidewalk. Or on the side of a garbage can. Or on a taco. Here you have the code for life itself, written not by a blind watchmaker but by someone who doesn't give a sh*t? Are we forced then to say it evolved? In what a trillion years? It was an accident in a scum filled pond? You know lightning hit the pond, made a 747 over there and a monkey over there? Even deep mind just called it software. So then what if the code originally was done properly but it devolved. Well that is maybe the best we can do to explain it. That analog data is known for being lossy, and it was analog data. I can't prove what I am about to tell you, so maybe I shouldn't even tell you, but this simulator we live in now, is a digital, that we obtained in 1992. and the old simulator the data was in was analog, and in 2012, all the power units in it, had burned out completely since it had a shelf life of 2 billion years. The new one thankfully has a shelf life of 3 billion years and the data is now eternal, since digitally encoded information in a digital machine, is eternal. Knowing that was going to happen, we were able to get a new simulator, new in 92, that is easy to remember. But now I have again made myself look like a nut just telling you this but hey scientists are used to being called a nut. And I can prove it to some extent, but certainly not here and not in this time frame and not with my hands tied behind my back unable to post links or even put the messages in order. Can't post images, all I have is this, and well I believe that you have a right to know. There are 4,300 religions in this world, and I am not one of them. But without proof, what else can you call it? What do we call string theory which has no proof and never predicted anything or was tested in any way shape or form? "String theory, in its current state of having no direct experimental evidence, testable predictions, or falsifiable claims, is most commonly referred to by critics as "not even wrong". This phrase, coined by physicist Wolfgang Pauli, describes a theory that is not just incorrect, but one that cannot even be tested or evaluated within the scientific method." lol I love that. Not even wrong. So regarding the theory of how everything started, in trying to discuss that without looking like religion, I am leaning towards computers came first. And so then that would mean that matter was here before any conscious mind and a universe that has no beginning but always was? You see here for any thinking person, we cannot grasp the idea of something that always was. It goes against everything we have in the way of intuition. Just like we cannot grasp infinity. We just can't wrap our minds around it and in order to understand or quantify anything we want an origin of some sort. But even at that then our question requires there to be nothing before we get something or option two it always was. So sadly, our minds have this limitation, and there are questions that we just cannot answer. Just like there might be colors that we cannot see that are within the visible spectrum, very difficult to believe. What if we were able to ask God for another color? Maybe we could get one. What if we asked a stamp collector for more letters in our alphabet, because there are how many definitions of the word free? ""Free" has a vast number of definitions, with the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) listing over 75 distinct meanings and uses, including obsolete ones. " So language itself, the way in which we are able to communicate between brains, using concepts, is clearly running out of characters in our alphabet, but who can you ask for more? I think at a point we just have to accept things, and what I do is I fall back on an old saying... "God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, Courage to change the things I can, And wisdom to know the difference." Thanks for the video.

[Rick1234567S]

I think that I feel more comfortable believing that the universe has always existed, rather than believe it came from nothing.

I think the blind watchmaker started as a computer, since hardware comes before software and cannot run without hardware.

I think if lightning hitting a scum filled pond can make a 747, then it could also make a monkey, but until then I think people who say that it did know very little about DNA, and RNA and proteins, and how the code executes, as a chain reaction.

I would rather believe that deep mind or someone like him, wrote the DNA code, since no terminated string with CAG repeats, saying as a coder, well lets terminate the string between 10 and 35 CAG repeats is like someone in India writing Widows 11.

Let me show you this...

"The most accurate atomic clocks in the world, such as the NIST quantum logic clock based on aluminum ions, can measure time with an accuracy extending to 19 decimal places. These optical clocks are so precise they would not lose or gain a second in over 14 billion years, effectively redefining the standard for timekeeping."

What this proves once again is that unless you are a physicist, you are a stamp collector like Rutherford said.

So my professional opinion tells me as a physicist, that the analog data is lossy, and DNA code has devolved here due to that, since the CAG repeats which lead to Huntington's, make no sense at all otherwise. To write code that adds up to the most complex thing in the universe bar none, to have such amazing code that is truly out of the world if you really understand it, and then to leave that makes absolutely no sense.

So where did it all come from? If we can accept that the universe has always been here, and the big bang, follows a pattern, Bosenova, nuke, supernova, big bang, then the big bang is another supernova. And could not come out of nothing.

I can believe that some crystals began to vibrate and interact with cosmic rays and turned into a rudimentary CPU and developed from there until God was born. Otherwise again things don't make sense. So I am with Elon Musk on this who says we live in a simulator.

And maybe always have.