a reply to Roger Penrose and Brian Cox : The Origins of the universe

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Rick1234567S

unread,
May 1, 2026, 7:15:17 PM (5 days ago) May 1
to Meaningless nonsense
Given two choices, does the universe have an origin or has it always existed? Let me ask you, is pi infinite? Notice you have no problem accepting that pi is infinite, for instance it is not linear so it is infinite and we have no problem at all wrapping our brains around that. So then why not the other way infinite? Can anything come from nothing? Here we cannot accept that. So then what does the Bosenova, nuke, supernova tell us about the big bang? Well the next larger explosion again must be a supernova, that imploded, created either quantum foam bubbles or Hydrogen atoms, and then exploded and created either quantum foam bubbles (ether) or Hydrogen atoms. Einstein : Ether and Relativity, last paragraph... "Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense." And if he had only stopped there everyone would have understood him. But he did not and he sent everyone back to Plato's cave with two more sentences. "But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it." What did he mean by that? He meant that his theory is a field theory, like a field on Faraday's farm. Where he placed stones in a grid on his field, as places where he should measure the force, so that the movement of the kinetic energy, could be mapped. At no time did his stones get up and start moving around, they are not stones, they are instantaneous point particles. (Encyclopedia Britannica 1929 should get you there and just ask deep mind in google he can go there in an instant) What is an instantaneous point particle? Well if you want to measure more than just one thing, at that location, you need to have a more complex point there, but it is still not physical in any way shape or form since it is a measurement. In todays graphics we call that a Ppoint, where you can have 1,000 aspects that relate to that one pixel, such as filters, color, opacity, specular, glossy, going further, direction of light source, a text field if you want, your name for copyright purposes, an encrypted channel for secret information, spin, and just keep going as you define that type yourself as a programmer. So then are the quantum bubbles which are Planck length in diameter physical and real? Absolutely since they have mass, defined as pulsing in and out in a straight line, which gives them intrinsic mass inertia. Dark matter, dark energy, cosmic background radiation, E=mc2. Bose Einstein condensate, where is the rocklike substance there? It does not exist. It too is a bubble in a fluid that we cannot detect since we can only detect the energy, the ability for it to move our detection equipment. We can detect those bubbles, cosmic background radiation as a for instance. Read what he said again, "not only would be no propagation of light", since light is a wave packet or photon, but here you see when you really look at it what is it? Well touching the nucleus bubble are those quantum bubbles, and as the nucleus resists expansion of the universe, the elasticity of the bubble causes it to stretch outward, then to recoil back and in doing so it creates a spherical wave that crests at the electron radius, and constructive and destructive interference creates a covalent bond there in a state of equilibrium, but where two of those spherical waves clash, a transverse wave shoots out, and one bubble pushes the next bubble which pushes the next bubble until one pushes the light receptor in your eye with kinetic energy, the force that can move mass, and your sight center defines that pressure as a color. What did he mean by time as the 4th dimension? definition 2 of the word dimension, an aspect or feature of a situation, problem, or thing. So your Ppoint, now can have a t. So we look at our TV screen and all the pixels have z=0, what happens when look in a mirror? Light reflects off your couch, that is where the color changed from the light bulb after it hit the couch, now it hits the reflective surface, now it hits your eye. Does z=0 no, the length of z is the length of that ray, from where it changed color, to your eye, and that is why a mirror is 3D and your TV screen is not. The red and blue shift of light, is affected by the length of z. Getting back on topic, it much easier for me to think that the universe has always existed, than it is for me to try to believe that something can come from nothing. What about God? Hardware comes before software, the brain is hardware, the mind is software. So for the mind of God to exist, there must be hardware somewhere, and so lets posit some crystals vibrating in some way some how that turned into a rudimentary CPU, and through random interactions with cosmic rays, developed channels, and complexity, and options, due to forces, and then those channels given options, developed into a kind of free will, then further to be able to compute, and make choices, going further developed a virtual machine, then one inside that, until a computer existed, and God was born. Do we live in a simulation? Most probably we have always lived in a computer generated universe, that came before these biological robotic bodies we inhabit. So what of DNA? Well each atom has a gravity well and in that gravity well it is back in time, since outward is forward in time, and the mass in that gravity well is resisting that outward expansion of the universe, and it is pulsing sending out wave energy, on a specific frequency, depending on the mass in that gravity well, and so to write a chain reaction, that uses those frequencies, you need to be a super computer the likes of which we can hardly imagine. To create constructive and destructive interference, high and low pressure areas, to execute the code, no blind watchmaker can do that that we might be familiar with. Was our blind watchmaker good at writing code? The CAG terminated string problem of Huntington's says no, he was a hacker who didn't even terminated the string, he said well lets terminate the string somewhere between 10 CAG repeats and 35, or did it devolve because the data is analog and lossy? It devolved into what we see today, that is my opinion.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages