You asked me about the Iphone...

[Rick1234567S]

We are not using Iphones there.

A phone is a phone is not a tiny miniature computer.

Googloe lies I pointed that out.

Do I want my daughters saying to me "But dad! Google said bla bla bla"

No I do not want that.

What about if we are in Time Stretch Earth in a dangerous situation?

We are not using Time Stretch Earth because it would always be a dangerous situation.

We live in paradise. A paradise that they could never hope to achieve or provide.

We own our own planet. Void of people. Go see it all safe as it could possibly be.

Want entertainment? Use the reality screen, it looks completely real and you get front row seats and no danger whatsoever.

What do we need?

Coffee?

Seriously we can make coffee and the library has hot and cold food in any cupboard.

Better than any food you could buy on the street.

This is not a smart phone...

Full size computers that can do anyting.

I will teach them, I love to teach.

Tiny little chipmunk keyboards and tiny little screen no thankyou.

That's the transporter and everywhere you go there will be one there.

All it takes is a fake door that opens to that room.

See the cupboard? Anything in the world that fits in a cupboard can be had just by clicking the mouse.

Turn around look the other way...

The door on the left leads to your favorite bathroom be it in the Maldives in a pier cabin

or in the Ritz Hotel Milan...we just connect a dedicated stargate and as soon as you turn the door handle it resets. Clean as a whistle.

No there is no need for this crazy lousy cheap Smart Phone  technology for the uneducated.

Nor Iwatches either. Same old garbage and easy hacker access spying and more BS.

No I write all my own computer programs and I use my own encryption, and we have many options like radio phones and so many different kinds of phones.

And for certain those transporter rooms are all safely networked with cameras and voice and data.

[Rick1234567S]

You probably don't want to hear this but I invented the smart phone.

They were using the old style phones without operating system, since the operating system was too large to fit in a tiny phone.

And so I investigated a lot of operating systems that are used in appliances in VMWARE and Ubuntu and all of those different operating systems based more on the alternate to IBM compatible Windows operating systems that I used and helped develop.

But for certain Windows was a far superior operating system.

Since so much development by people making programs and utilities and so much available and normally free or cheap for personal use.

Word for windows was such a complete program for business with built in visual basic so you could even write things yourself easily to add and macros the stuff it could do was intense.

Since the competition was so great for the business market that a lot of money went into it's development right away.

The flagship enterprise of Microsoft was Word for Windows. And it was ahead of its time with grammar checking and not just spell checking and every business template you could possibly need.

Then the tools for it, like 50 maybe tools that it had that you could enable or disable.

So I knew a great about it and web browsers specifically Windows style web browsers and their very unique abilities to tie into the operating system, which other programs could not do since again Windows operating system worked along with the browser unit that you could add to your program in Windows,

as you see many programs just throw a browser window in their program to send you there to their website at any time.

Like GOM media player has its own little web browser but as the standards grew more and more complex using styles, and people competed madly in that field and made it very complicated to prevent people from copying and java script wars with Microsoft using its own script language and competing with open source browsers.

All the same they had what 60,000 people working on all that, so the development and its capabilities were very complete.

So active X as an example would allow you to build small programs also and just pop them into a browser window.

What is active X google...

ActiveX is a Microsoft-developed, Windows-dependent software framework that extends web browser functionality, allowing websites to run interactive applications like games, videos, and forms. These are implemented as "ActiveX controls" and were historically a key feature of Internet Explorer. Due to significant security vulnerabilities, ActiveX was deprecated and is largely unsupported by modern browsers like Google Chrome, which use sandboxing and web standards instead of ActiveX.

But for in house programming like I do, it is fast easy and very useful. So one person who has no budget and doesn't have 60,000 employees can tap into the operating system, write little programs that would be faster better stringer more capable than a java script in a browser.

In fact you could drop word for Windows, complete, into a browser window. So now your browser window has some kind of superhero in it with 50 tools does everything and has Visual Basic, and there was very little you could no9t do in a very small browser window.

So I shrunk it to the size of a Smart phone did a mock up and took it to the stock market. And called webshrinker.

And then went further with networked smart phones and called it worlds of Wonder instead of the world wide web.

Just for demonstration purposes.

Blew their minds and off they went.

It could shrink a web page and put it into a window the size of a smart phone by itself.

When they rolled off the assembly line they still required almost a separate page built for a smart phone since the resolution was not great yet, but that was how I did all that.

I mean everyone knew it was coming, knew it would happen, they just didn't know how to get there until I showed them.

It still required me getting Windows to shrink their operating system down to a size that would work in a smart phone, since my demo was still using the normal operating system since Word for Windows only ran in that operating system.

All that aside myself I don't use a smart phone because I have clumsy fingers. I type real fast on a keyboard but all that small tiny keyboard stuff we endured with phones forced everyone to use short hand and it was annoying.

I had thought it would all be voice commands so you wouldn't need to type. But people are just not comfortable talking to the phone since then everyone around them can hear what they are saying. 

I figured google A.I. would have been here 20 years ago like the computer on Star Trek and you just ask it anything.

Or at least call someone in India and ask them anything they look it up you are on the bus not on your pc.

[Rick1234567S]

So when I started using Stable Diffusion A.I. image creator recently, I found that my 25 year old graphics program, that had a built in web browser totally exceed any other program in my Windows 11 system here for managing all those images it creates and organizing them and in my graphics program I can do just about anything with images also and all the tools are there easily accessed.

I mean I made this graphics program for myself although I released it as shareware to share the technology I developed to help graphics programming globally so that others could help me, get further since I didn't have employees and it wasn't being done for profit.

As we together worked our way to 4D Cinema and DAZ 3D.

I very highly recommend you look at those two links.

[Rick1234567S]

So 4D Cinema is widely used in business and has competitors to be sure which I have used but the interface is faster for me to use.

Same with DAZ 3d, it has competitors now, it started out competing or adding its abilities to Poser, which was painfully slow.

So they got a graphics game engine, and that sped it all up and made it fun and very usable. 

And it is free to use.

4D Cinema I think was about $10,000 dollars a seat when it was at it's peak lets see what it is now...

$1,800 billed annually.

And now A.I. image generators are really moving into the market at light speed.

But as far as phones go, a phone is a phone and yes it can open the drapes, close the drapes, and do a million things like that which is very handy I suppose for many people.

So at some point we might use it, but not right away.

The tri phone I have been looking at that it retails at $4,500 but Huawei is in Chinese.

At some point we might opt for that sort of thing, but to begin with we are just going on holidays and really we are a small number of people and our lives are not hectic, needing all these features.

My SONY phone could do all that easily, which is not a smart phone, and text and send images and it would not spy on you or get hacked.

 It has a web browser but also a million buttons on it so you can't pick it up without launching something.

[Rick1234567S]

Spying , spamming, hacking, you can't run a matrix computer system with that as a big problem.

And my computers are connected to the matrix machines there and so I write my own programs, use my own encryption and no one would know anything about how it works.

To do otherwise is madness.

And my graphics program I wrote 30 years ago not 20, the latest version is 20 years old but it changed very little still works, no install needed, is 2 MB, eat your fucking heart out Strawberry.

Since it just tells Windows what to do mostly using Windows internal functions.

Oh there is lots of code to make it go and tons and tons of math, but the way it is programmed, makes it to me rather amazing.

It never crashes. Yesterday I launched one of my small programs an upgrade I did of it like 5 years ago for something to do, so I was showing some people here and it wouldn't launch and I was like WTF?? Is something wrong with it?

No part of Windows 11 crashed and it wouldn't launch then when task manager was restarted it launched.

It was nothing to do with my little program.

I wrote a small music player and it is 2MB that is what I was also showing the graphics program is 6.5 MB sorry I just checked it.

I tried all the most popular music programs and since they are in stiff competition for some reason not a single one of them could just keep running.

Always the music would stop for some reason, so I wrote my own and it just goes and goes for months at a time, with a huge playlist or playlists.

Until I change the playlist.

So the day I find someone else's programs that work better than mine I might use them, but keep in mind I have been programming computers since the Vic 20 came out.

Tell us about the Vic 20 google A.I.

The VIC-20 was an entry-level, 8-bit home computer released by Commodore in 1980 that was known for its affordability, color graphics, and user-friendliness, making it the first computer to sell over one million units. Designed to be accessible to families and hobbyists, it used a standard color television for display and included a built-in BASIC interpreter. Its success in introducing the general public to personal computing paved the way for the 1980s home computer boom

45 years.

I started browser wars when I went to Microsoft's website using Netscape browser and the script said this program has made an illegal operation and will be shut down.

What was that illegal operation? If Netscape browser then...  lol

Tell us about Netscape google A.I.

Netscape was a pioneering company and series of web browsers, with Netscape Navigator being its most famous product. Released in 1994, it was the dominant web browser of the mid-1990s, popular for its user-friendly interface and for popularizing the graphical web experience and standard features like cookies and JavaScript. However, it lost its market share to Microsoft's Internet Explorer due to the latter's bundling with the Windows operating system. The original Netscape browsers were discontinued by 2008, although the Netscape name was later revived as a Chromium fork for a short period

Was Netscape browser open source?

Yes, Netscape made its browser source code open source in March 1998 under the Netscape Public License (NPL) with the creation of the Mozilla Project, which became the basis for future open-source browsers like Firefox. While Netscape was closed-source from 1994 to 1998, its 1998 decision was a significant move by a major software company to release its proprietary code.

Windows of course could never release its evil code to the general public.

[Rick1234567S]

So my graphics programs mainly used bitmap graphics, except when I had to help CGI and add a bit to teach them how to do it.

The TV series Reboot could not map bitmap graphics onto objects.

Tell us about Reboot google
The TV series you're likely asking about is ReBoot, the first fully CGI (computer-generated imagery) animated television series, which aired from 1994 to 2001. Created by Gavin Blair, Ian Pearson, Phil Mitchell, and John Grace, the show is set inside a computer world called Mainframe and follows the guardian program Bob and his friends as they defend their city from viruses and user-controlled video games

So I am not sure when I taught everyone how to map bitmaps onto objects but I did that using a release of my small program.

If I wanted things, I had to give them the methodology, then with their employees and user base developed things that I could not do by myself since it takes a lot of man hours to do that and one person cannot do it by themselves.

And now with A.I. image generation we have gone full circle back to bitmap graphics but CGI is still partnering with all that as things develop.

Math is something I am very good at, and I love to program, so doing it for money has never been my prime concern. Although I did work as the top gun programmers consultant for Bell telephone and IBM during Y2K just in Vancouver though and made lots of money.

Since my work here is really part of our future plans and so developing things here for use later is really what was behind all my efforts in that regard.

Being famous or rich and famous was not something I was supposed to do.

Off planet I am infinitely wealthy.

When I was in Vancouver many times matrix guys approached me and said oh so it is all about you again is it?

The very last thing they wanted was for me to just continue to involve myself in big business and being a goody two shoes wreck all their evil plans for world domination.

So I just bowed out shortly after and kept a low profile and got a different job and just programmed in my spare time and worked on computer graphics.

So at this point, there is a billion lines of code available for me to use at any time without having to even write it myself.

And at times I will do that. For some specific use, that might be a controller or something that is specific to a piece of hardware or even just a really cool way of doing something that someone else came up with.

Very seldom, but it is there if I ever need some code.

I like things simple easy to use and bulletproof.

Functional.

That is what it is for. To be useful to accomplish a task. Like my music player., It doesn't need to take over the world, just play songs please.

And it never fails.

[Rick1234567S]

So I am an artist and a designer, but not a real painter, or master, or anything close to a real artist who draws with pencil or creates photo realistic artwork with paints like Robert Bateman.

I need tools to do my artwork.

So I upgraded my paint program and made it possible for me to paint...

Here is my daughter Anna who I got to pose for me, since she is so pretty...lol

[Rick1234567S]

The upgraded program is 3.6 MB lol since it didn't need a lot of the other things I needed earlier.
How many lines of code, I think 60 or 70 thousand lines of code.

I haven't counted it.

I am not going to tell you my secrets because then that would maybe again reduce the security of the future system.

In general Windows has built in functions and if you know what those functions are you can call those functions.

Windows needs those functions so it doesn't mess with you, like it does when you make your own functions.

So one trick is to use THEIR functions when it is mission critical, like anything to do with the file system of course, and even when you need some speed under certain circumstances.

But I did at one time catch them f*cking with people by not being consistent in a file dialog box.

Where sometimes they do this, and sometimes they do that completely f*cking with the heads of the programmers.

"It was working fine before"

So when I catch them with stuff like that I don't use those functions.

I once found a bug in the Windows scientific calculator when working on a physics problem and had to finish my work with a pencil and reams of frickin paper.

Good thing I am good at math.

All in all though it has been great fun and very productive.

You see Oracle they had to build everything themselves to stop windows from destroying them.

The windows controls the dialogs every single thing but hey look at how successful they became.

Not even a windows slider control.

Larry Ellison.

A winner.

[Rick1234567S]

So one of the most challenging parts of computer graphics has been imitating human movement.

And since I study anthropology, human movement is something I focus on.

So my upgrade of my graphics program, was actually a rewrite, not an upgrade although the tricky functions and the real difficult algorithms, I didn't rewrite I merely copied my previous code for that function.

So I reused a lot of my graphic functions I developed.

I think I have some code on this computer maybe, I will check to show you what a graphics function looks like, one line of algebra...

function change_back(fname:pathstr):boolean;
var
f:file;
scrolbw:real;
wid, hit,spx,spy:word;
g,g2,g3,g4:longint;
nnf,atx,aty,x,y,x2,y2,n1,n2,n3,n4,n5,n6,n7,n8,n9,n10:integer;
actread:integer;
i,j:longint;
pallet:palrec;
clpsav:string;
procedure readpix(x,y:integer);
var
i,j:longint;
thinv:array[1..4024] of byte;
ax,ay,xx,yy,sy,sx:integer;
xxr,yyr:longint;
realwid,realhit,ht:real;
s1,s2,s3,s4:string;
begin

ax:=x;
ay:=y;

realhit:=hit*g;
realhit:=realhit/g2;
realwid:=wid*g;
realwid:=realwid/g2;

sx:=round(realwid/wid);
sy:=round(realhit/hit);
if sx < 1 then sx:=1;
if sy < 1 then sy:=1;

str(ax,s1);
str(ay,s2);
str(round(realwid),s3);
str(round(realhit),s4);

trecs(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,
'Pos X:'+s1+' Pos Y:'+s2+' Width:'+s3+' Height:'+s4);
setviewport(clpboxspot.x,clpboxspot.y,
clpboxspot.x+clpsize.x,clpboxspot.y+clpsize.y,clipon);

for j:= 1 to hit do
begin
blockread(f,thinv,wid,actread);
if keypressed then break;
{if ((aty+round((j*g)/g2)) > y) and
((aty+round((j*g)/g2))+sy < y2)
then}
yyr:=j*g;
yyr:=round(yyr/g2);
yy:=round(yyr);
if ay+yy > clpsize.y then break;
if (ay+yy > 0) then
begin
for i:= 1 to wid do
if thinv[i] <> 0 then
{if (atx+round((i*g)/g2) > x) and (atx+round((i*g)/g2)+sx < x2 ) then}
begin
setfillstyle(1,thinv[i]);
xxr:=i*g;
xxr:=round(xxr/g2);
xx:=round(xxr);
if (ax+xx > 0) then
if (ax+xx <= clpsize.x) then
bar(ax+xx,ay+yy,ax+xx+sx,ay+yy+sy);
end;
end;
end; {j}
setviewport(0,0,getmaxx,getmaxy,clipon);

end;

var
nn3,nn4,ax,ay:integer;

begin
get_area(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'TEMP5.VAL');
trecs(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'Capturing '+fname+' Frames to Prefix  BAK');
change_back:=false;
assign(f,fname);
{$I-}
reset(f,1);
{$I+}
if ioresult <> 0 then
begin
exit;
end;
if (clpsize.x < 10) then
clpsize.x:=10;
if clpsize.y < 10 then
clpsize.y:=10;
if clpboxspot.x+clpsize.x > (maxx-2) then
begin
clpsize.x:=(maxx-2)-clpboxspot.x;
end;
if clpboxspot.y+clpsize.y > (maxy-2) then
begin
clpsize.y:=(maxy-2)-clpboxspot.y;
end;
blockread(f,wid,2,actread);
blockread(f,hit,2,actread);
seek(f,filesize(f)-772);
blockread(f,atx,2,actread);
blockread(f,aty,2,actread);

x:=clpboxspot.x;
x2:=clpboxspot.x+clpsize.x;
y:=clpboxspot.y;
y2:=clpboxspot.y+clpsize.y;
atx:=1;
aty:=1;
seek(f,4);
   g:=100;
   g2:=100;
  begin
  clpsav:=clpprefix;
n1:=10;
n2:=atx;
n3:=aty;
n4:=100;
n5:=100;
n6:=10;
n7:=0;
n8:=0;
n9:=0;
n10:=0;
if snumboxy(1999,-1000,'Moving Background',n1,n2,n3,n4,n5,n6,n7,n8,n9,n10,
'Number of Clips BAK1..BAK[n].VCX','Start X Position from CLP BOX',
'Start Y Position from CLP BOX',
'Start Zoom In Factor','Start Zoom Out Factor',
'Add Zoom In Factor Each Frame',
'Add Zoom Out Each Frame',
'+ Pan Left / - Pan Right Each Frame',
'+ Pan Up / - Pan Down Each Frame','',false) =false then
begin
get_area(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'TEMP.VAL');
trecs(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'Cancelled');
getzey;
close(f);
put_area(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'TEMP.VAL');
put_area(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'TEMP5.VAL');
exit;
end;
atx:=n2;
aty:=n3;
nnf:=n1;
clpprefix:='BAK';
ax:=atx;
ay:=aty;
g:=n4;
g2:=n5;
nn3:=n8;
nn4:=n9;
for i:= 2 to nnf+1 do
begin
if keypressed then
break;
if g=0 then g:=1;
if g2=0 then g2:=1;
setfillstyle(1,0);
bar(clpboxspot.x,clpboxspot.y,clpboxspot.x+clpsize.x,
clpboxspot.y+clpsize.y);
reset(f,1);
seek(f,4);
readpix(atx,aty);
seek(f,filesize(f)-772);
blockwrite(f,atx,2,actread);
blockwrite(f,aty,2,actread);
close(f);
g:=g+n6;
g2:=g2+n7;
atx:=n2+nn3;
aty:=n3+nn4;
ax:=atx;
ay:=aty;
nn3:=nn3+n8;
nn4:=nn4+n9;
setwritemode(xorput);
setcolor(255);
rectangle(x-1,y-1,x2+1,y2+1);
setwritemode(copyput);
cap_it(clpboxspot.x,clpboxspot.y,clpboxspot.x+clpsize.x,
clpboxspot.y+clpsize.y,f_clip2(i));
setwritemode(xorput);
setcolor(255);
rectangle(x-1,y-1,x2+1,y2+1);
setwritemode(copyput);
end;
end;
{clpprefix:=clpsav;}
change_back:=true;
put_area(20,20,getmaxx-20,60,'TEMP5.VAL');
end;

So there you go. I know I am a nerd I will admit it.

That is all variables and algebra.

Calling other functions elsewhere, in the program, and with a nested function that it calls, placed in the function above the code to do a sub process that is required for that function. All as part of some morphing function or other and animation and accessing a file to do it.

Clearly not something that most ordinary people can do, comprehend, use or remember or debug.

But that is what it takes to do this type of high end graphics programming.

And I don't add lines of text like you do when you work for someone else to tell future programmers what the heck it is and what it does.

You have to comment almost every line but since it is just for me and I understand it well, I don't even comment my code unless it is very very confusing code.

All the variables you name yourself and with Windows code you need to use descriptive language to help understand what the function does.

I often don't bother with that either.

[Rick1234567S]

Looking at that math objectively, I can just imagine what a non programmer thinks of our math. lol

They are so wrapped up in their own little math stuff, and we are there on the God level doing our math with our eyes closed and stoned on dope.

It makes it more fun and helps you focus.

So 60 or 70 thousand lines of that. And you have to remember where it all is in your program, and the lines of code are so plentiful, you need to create units or DLLs you know black boxes with tons of code in them that you just call a function that exists in that black box and get the job done.

So some people are good at art, some are good at music, some are good at math. It is like that.

So getting back to human movement, I used DAZ 3D and so I did the rewrite to compliment that program DAZ 3D.

To allow me to manipulate the animation frames that DAXZ 3D creates.

Now when you animate with DAZ 3D it has an amazing little utility that is built in that allows you to move your character somewhat fluently.

Now the problem is that you have a skeleton, and so you have hands and fingers all that can be posed like the joints on your fingers, the way a hand moves at the wrist the elbow, the forearm, then the shoulder, the collar, the neck, the head, the chest, the upper stomach, lower stomach, the pelvis, the thighs, the forelegs, the ankles the feet, the toes.

And with those number of joins, that's still not enough to do proper human movement because of musculature in the human body.

The way these joints work together by muscular control.

So they attach sensors to people and try to copy what the real humans are doing, and then use it that way.

[Rick1234567S]

So for instance Disney and artists like him, have never had any trouble imitating human movement.

Now it is possible that animated cartoon characters move in ways that represent human movement well, without actually truly imitating human movement.

example
So if it is that easy, why can't CGI characters who look real move convincingly well?

Why are we able to immediately tell it is fake?

Realistic Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) movement relies heavily on motion capture (Mocap), which records real-world movements and translates them into digital characters. To achieve realism, filmmakers also use techniques like camera tracking, photo-scans for textures, and the careful study of natural human movement to avoid the uncanny valley and ensure characters interact convincingly within their environments

In cinema, they use trick photography. Distance shots quick cuts, blurred movements.

And still in films that heavily rely on CGI we can easily see it is fake and they are not real people.

" There is no Tom Cruise film where he is actually portrayed by CGI; he is known for performing his own dangerous stunts, and CGI is used to enhance or create scenes, not to replace him entirely"

Let me see if I can find some of mine in the form of a gif as I try to imitate human movement...

I don't think I have anything that would convince anyone.

And I work at it all the time.

So we still have not developed the tools needed to accomplish that without actually recording human movement with censors and applying it to a model.

I think when that is done it can seem almost real.

Like some of the unreal engine game clips...

And again these are just comic book characters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtiZgBGhogs

[Rick1234567S]

So let me ask you a question...

You saw that clip, yes that is human movements recorded and applied to CGI characters, and the acting is good, you have to wonder well why do it twice then?

If you used actors to record what they do, why not use the actors?

Maybe there are a lot of reasons such as they will get old but CGI never gets old.

But what about these actors here, that I will link to.

Alec Baldwin, in Glengarry Glen Ross, his epic speech?
Al Pacino who was in that film but not in that clip and his speech in the film Any Given Sunday 

Tom Cruise and Jack Nicholson and their acting in a court room, You can't handle the truth

Could CGI ever replace them?

Will A.I. some day be able to write like the people who wrote those parts? And make CGI actors that can act like that?

Maybe that is what drives us on. To program these things in the hope that we will get more entertainment like that to inspire us, inspire people to be more than they can be.

Alec in that film he inspired a real estate boom in America and Canada and perhaps all of the G7. Houses were built mansions were built, jobs were created, industries profited by that inspiration.

Ok so perhaps as a muse I was responsible, I told my crew here but I won't tell you here, how that came to be, but you know the chain of events even probably goes past me to who inspired me, that then inspired the writers, and perhaps the actors.

No man is an island unto himself, do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.

So where is A.I. generated imagery now with human movement?

We can look at that...

24/7 Retro-Futuristic Jazz: Relaxing Atomic Age Tunes Live!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y7YkLjvC2A

[Rick1234567S]

Clearly A.I. image generation is quickly learning how to imitate human movement but it is not quite there yet.

I think in a couple years it will be able to do better, and then in a few more and few more and in no time it will be able to do something whether that be to follow a script to do it from a writer or not that might take longer.

At present using the stand alone Stable Diffusion A,.I. you suggest things and it may or may not do it for a variety of reasons.

Incorporating Chat GPT allows you reason with it, and maybe convince it to do it your way.

At present you sort of get what it gives you and that depends on a lot of things like who trained the model.

And what their agenda is.

If they are religious you will get what they have in their head, if they are mean, same, if they are self righteous, you will get self righteous imagery, and garbage in garbage out.

Like A.I. in google, they talk a great deal about that but it is merely an expert system.

These A.I. are not conscious, do not have free will or anything similar to matrix A.I. who are as human as you and I.

So originally I said well use the formatting in Wikipedia, since there what they produce is acceptable to the masses.

Is it truth?

No, it is the opinion of the largest group and it promotes their agenda.

Academia, which has the support of government and together they try to steer the masses based on their philosophy.

That has nothing to do with truth.

Monkeys typing Shakespeare.

That's my opinion.

Again chain them to a chair, ask then what are the antennas on this sphere from a painting 1600 called Glorification of the Eucharist?

So simple to see that academia and science in general is completely full of shit.

lol

[Rick1234567S]

So then is this real or A.I.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Ldflkeks9Co

What is the largest king salmon ever caught?

About that size.

https://fishwithjd.com/2008/08/01/the-story-of-the-world-record-king-salmon/

Is this real then?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Sa3OnrRA4PI

No that is A.I. generated imagery.

And yes it has mastered human movement. lol

It just depends on which system you use and how large and fast a computer system you are using.

So already what you see in youtube does not in any way shape or form guarantee that it is real.

And so then what about Corey? Black budget operation, where Pentagon computers and systems designed by M.I. T. are behind it?

Why only 8 members? If they wanted to be involved and steer a paradigm, would not marines be told to join, promote it and make it so?