my reply to Huge Breakthrough: The World's First Ternary Computer

[Rick1234567S]

@Rick1234567S
0 seconds ago
Thanks for the video Anastasi. The answer is , Is reality pos and neg, is it dichotomy? In your room, do you see anything that has an opposite? Outside? What is the opposite of a ham sandwich? You see reality is not pos neg, in fact atoms are not digital, they are analog, digital is where you merely put Faraday's stones in a field and measure where those markers are.
People tend to confuse that and think his stones in his field move around and they do not. Freeze frame and you can have digital, but you will only get binary with a pendulum philosophy that we see too much of in this world. The real answer is, yes, no, maybe so. 3 states. Schrodinger,  is the cat alive or dead or half dead? You see we can say it is 80 percent dead, now we are not in 3 states we are using quantum states. But we need to simplify and stick to 3 states because there we can be accurate. Light based computing is the future and 3 states. With Georg Cantor,  he said we don't know, if pi is infinite, (I am paraphrasing,)  but we know that it is either one or the other. So we throw out the unknown, and we use a set, that uses 0 and 1, and we just need to then fix the halting problem (with Turing included here) excuse me if I am going too fast and skipping a lot of people in this comment, but I hear a lot of quantum talking in this world by people who don't understand quantum computing, not yourself of course, but by physicists who seek to be mysterious and confusing, and in doing so confuse everyone else. When you want to build a machine you cannot be confusing. So a slightly longer fiber optic cable gives you a different reading at the detector, a delay so that you can very easily make 0, 1, and 2, or -1 ,1 and 0. That's all I have time for but again thanks for the video and keep them coming and good luck with your company.



Reply


@Rick1234567S
15 minutes ago (edited)
I will give you a bit more. So then if the answer is maybe so, we reroute to sub process and there we use a timer, to prevent the halting problem, we say if in x number of attempts then it remains unknown, if in the sub process using weights we can determine the cat is probably 80 percent dead, that is like saying we are not sure pi is infinite, but we have sure tried to prove it is, and must assume it is 'for all intents and purposes'. Now the math and the compiling and the programming depends on what you are comfortable using, and how you want to create your machine and keep it mysterious, confusing, and have your edge on the competition. So I won't give you my opinion since the field is still wide open. eg: What is the temperature of the box the cat is in? That would give you a weight.