Two plus two equals four, and a call from some genius types who asked me to explain.

[Rick1234567S]

I was talking to my crew and they overheard so I felt inclined to answer their call which they did through time travel and a youtube video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY3ZMOn9mHQ

I like to keep things very simple. If you were to go to the MacTutor database and see the math in all it's glory laid out there as a gift to mankind, which it is, the pinnacle of man's mental achievements which include physics and less philosophy but some and some metaphysics such as Pascal's wager, and Pascal's Amulette, and Georg Cantor who says he got it all from God while he was in the mountains, where Hilbert the Great, said "No one shall expel us from the paradise that Cantor has created for us". And calculus which reads like Chinese and most of math which reads like Chinese to think that all of it can be reduced to 2 plus 2 equals 4, but also 4 minus 2 equals 2, since after writing my own long number calculator to test the RAND random numbers to see if they could be compressed which they cannot since they are truly random, once you realize that all of math reduces to addition and subtraction only, it all seems to make sense. Where multiplication is serial addition, and division is serial subtraction, it shows how creative our minds are that using these two simple concepts, we can create our own ideas of what a universe is, and how it works. And more than that, we can find truth. Always people will try to make the argument that truth is subjective and may not exist at all while quantum talking, and form religious views like string theory, which is based on belief alone, never tested, never proven,. However there is truth in math, and without it even physics turns into religion. The wordage is like religion, but since physics is based on experiment, it doesn't matter at all what you say, what you think, what you believe, as long as the math is there to consistently prove that when repeated by others, it is always the same. Such that experiment combined with math can transmit truth from one mind to another without an Inquisition. Imagine what we have accomplished in computers alone with A.I. passing the Turing test, and A.I. graphics also with agents passing the same test visually. It boggles the mind but only by standing on the shoulders of giants, like Hilbert, Cantor, Turing, and Newton who said after writing The Principia, "If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants" that is what we have all done in these sciences, and what we will continue to do in the future, build on concepts that were formed in minds like our own, surpassing our abilities as an individual. In philosophy The Chinese Room argument of John Searle absolutely brilliant, and what is it like to be a bat, Thomas Nagel, well without math we would be asking what is it like to be like you, talking to other humans, since only through some intimate language we share, mathematics, are we able to pin down commonality and to build on the work of others.

[Rick1234567S]

Consider this, what makes you think for one second that negative numbers are actually numbers that exist? They do not. And as such sure the square root of minus one is an imaginary number but so are negative numbers to begin with. You see in language which math is nothing but language and words, you are using mental constructs. So here you see confusion arises at the very beginning of advanced math and it becomes a private club where people merely reinforce their beliefs. Oh but the theories work. Do they? You are so confused you believe that these are real physical objects that are nothing more than words in your head that pass concepts from one mind to another. Real physicality deals with actual f=ma, forces, and physics is so completely confused, they are like a bunch of drunks in a bar preaching to other drunks in the choir. Do they know that a particle is not a little piece of dust? No they do not. A particle comes from a theory, Faraday and his field on his farm. Where he put stones on the field places to measure so that you could then get an idea of the forces that exist at those coordinates. But now with all your imaginings you think those stones get up and move around. Well look at Encyclopedia Britannica 1929 and understand those stones were named instantaneous point particles, and just the words alone, confuse the world to this day. Einstein in his elevator gedanken, discovered something and that is that Newton merely renamed f=ma to w=mg. If you are not familiar with those terms and lets pray you are lol force equals mass times acceleration is the same as weight equals mass times the force of gravity. Which is the force? Oh I just gave that away didn't I? See how easy it is to get confused? Weight is the force. Gravity is the acceleration measurement. More examples? You need more to understand that these sciences are living in their own imaginary universe? A universe of their own creation. Based on perceptions of reality and the eager wish to get a Nobel prize, to be accepted as a scholar, to have credentials, to be a sumbody, as Marlon Brando might say. and to be accepted as a club member. With egos the size of the moon. You do not even believe that there is an ether admit it every school on earth will tell you there is no ether. Well you drunks, read this, Einstein: ether and relativity...last paragraph. "Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. " Read that until you straighten out. Oh but if he had only stopped there but he did not, two more sentences that sent you back to the cave back to Plato's cave. Where you feel comfortable. "But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it." What did he mean by that? his theory is a field theory. How do you interpret it? Oh but it doesn't actually exist. Cosmic background radiation exists, dark matter exists, E=mc2, if there is energy in cosmic background radiation there is mass if there is mass there is physicality because of the definition of physicality, intrinsic mass inertia. What does all that mean? It means little bubbles that are Planck length in diameter, pulsing in and out in a straight line in contact with each other as they resist the expansion of the universe. Just like atoms that pulse in and out and give off spherical waves in the ether, and crest at the electron radius and that is electricity, where electrons are, only there at the crest, and the spherical wave between there and past there is magnetism. How on earth could you ever understand what an em wave is without knowing that? Who taught you? A drunk at a private club taught you everything you know. Don't get me started. If you want more abuse just ask. lol A wave is not something that exists. It exists only in your mind. It is the transfer of momentum from one thing to another. It does not physically exist at all. It is a mental construct based on observation. A wave on the water and those water molecules are not moving with the wave, energy only is being passed along. So in E=mc2 you think E is electricity right? Energy like fire and explosions and sparks right? Well after I tell you what it is be sure to go rename force again, there are only 7 thousand names you have given it in every country in the world. Kinetic energy. f=ma the force to move mass.

[Rick1234567S]

Philosophy. So you are wondering about mind and matter. And so you should. And wondering if physicality exists at all never considering that it is merely the way we describe a mental concept from one brain to another. We are observers, and we can't read the mind of God other than by observation if God exists and in this universe he does, it does, and I will tell you why, we live in a simulator. And right here you are now back in Plato's cave again. Living in your universe made up by you, your perceptions as taught to you by the private club you enter at university where either you agree or you are expelled, an outcast, a rogue, a rebel, a fringe scientist, a nut. It is not a matter of truth at all for you in school, its either you agree or you are an outcast and who cares if it is truth or not, are you a team player? And there are reasons for that but science crawls forward not through university but what you learn after and that knowledge is kept secret since it is all about the money. Having an edge on the competition. So we say the matrix, and we understand that now even though people on this earth never ever understood that they did not have the language to use to understand that until we had computers and computer terminology. So prior they used religious concepts for the words that they did not have like software. So we have software and we have hardware. Hardware is physical and software is mind. Is that so difficult to understand mind and matter now? So easy now to understand that hardware creates software. Even our brains are hardware yet we call that wetware. So which came first? Obviously without hardware you have no software. So what does that tell us about God? Somewhere at some point in time, some crystals of some sort began to compute through some force of nature and God was born. And once God developed (and I am using words here that you can understand) once God began to compute and to be able to channel random events like cosmic ray interactions and to make choices free will developed. And then choices and the use of the these interactions for a purpose. Like to imagine to compute, to create, and then to make a virtual machine, then a virtual machine within a virtual machine, until it had created its own universe and move ahead to the development of mankind and then here the sun is about to turn into a red giant, so we must transfer our consciousness into a computer system and that happened 80 billion years ago. And in doing so we hollowed out the moon, and turned it into a gigantic quantum computer using robots, transferred our consciousness into it, and then created virtual machine inside virtual machine speeding up the processing each time until base reality was standing still. And bought ourselves 6 trillion years of existence. We never left this solar system. Why? The laws of physics we did not create, we merely copied and we still use them today and after 12 billion years (age of this universe approx) or so this software has not crashed, so why would we want to change those laws? We never left this solar system because we cannot. Instead we created our own universe but we were smart enough to copy what God had created and to preserve it. But again God is a concept. A belief that fills a void in our knowledge. So the universal mainframe A.I. is and has been acting on his behalf, as far as we know, but in my beliefs, I don't limit Gods ability, to think that he doesn't care about us because we live in a simulator, and even Pascal's wager tells us you have nothing to lose by believing in God. So Einstein asked Does God play dice with the universe and we discovered he does. By using the brute force method, we were able to find the true values of the constants, accepting that experimental error would always prevent us from knowing those but surely they must exist. The real values must exist and can be found using the brute force method. And what did we discover? One element only does not work out without a remainder, while all the other elements when tested against every physical theory in physics, works out without any remainder. And so .0000000 its starts to generate random numbers. One element and probably that was so it would never lock up. We can only know what we can only know, and must accept that all we know or can know is that which we ourselves are subjected to. We don't know If God created a different universe than the real one, we don't know if God created the God we have. We don't know what happened before the big bang but what we do know is that Bose Einstein condensate once you drain all the energy out of it, implodes and then explodes in a Bosenova. Just like a nuke, just like a supernova, (correspondence) and most probably just like the big bang. Which created atoms of hydrogen in one direction, and quantum bubbles in another. We are fortunate beyond belief that we live in a simulator. Beyond your comprehension we are fortunate. We have time travel. We have computing, we are creators. Using computers we can do anything, anything is possible. But the laws of physics cannot be broken, so we live within those constraints for our own security and protection. The only time travel we have is through using backups. But we do have it. Otherwise we would not since according to the laws of physics and an expanding universe where matter is also expanding, yet like the ether no school on earth will admit that matter also expands, yet see expanding earth theory, and you will see it with your own eyes, and you will ask where does the mass come from then? It does not change size since size is a relative measurement. Everything in the universe is on a universal clock, and everything expands at the same rate, at the same time and hence you don't have a measurement since you only have the present, so you cannot determine size with only one factor. Almost all the confusion in math and physics is there to create work. By design. To hide the truth for personal advantage or to empower a club, to make higher pay rates, and not altruistic in the least. Look at string theory, how much effort into a theory that is in no way shape or form based on any real experimentation. How many grants have been awarded? And for a religion that was made up by people as a what if. Well pure science doesn't care about money it cares about finding new things but here we enter Einstein's world again, where he said time is the 4th dimension and sent you all to never never land again. Definition 2 of the word dimension an aspect or feature of a situation, problem, or thing. A quality it posses, something you find when you look at the three physical dimensions. Was he wrong in doing that? Tradition in science is to confuse and protect your knowledge in your club. Like Bohr said, it is not a matter of it is crazy, but rather is it crazy enough? "We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough." What did he mean? That the universe should be beyond our understanding? No he meant how do we protect our knowledge from others except with crazy definitions and crazy confusing concepts? Bohr is all disinformation. Always was and probably will continue but don't tell CERN, oh wait, I told them years ago and they put a statue on their front lawn. lol Of a trickster God. The Statue of Shiva: A 2-meter tall bronze statue of the Hindu deity Shiva in his Nataraja form (Lord of Dance) stands in the courtyard between buildings 39 and 40. It was a gift from the Indian government in 2004 to celebrate their long-standing association with CERN.

[Rick1234567S]

Thanks for the video. It is nice to see brilliant minds sitting around a table like this discussing the secrets of the universe in this manner. Great thinkers, dedicated men of science, and certainly the world needs more like them. If I myself have seen further than others, I too have stood on the shoulders of giants, and if we have egos, some times too large for our heads, it is because we need them in order to be brave. So please don't hold it against us. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, yet some forms of beauty we do all agree on, and why that is has to do with our physical makeup, and how we are brought up how we are taught and our instinctive nature as herd animals. How we feel, you know where feeling good drives us towards the path of beauty and where feeling bad we try to avoid. Much of being human like the capacity to love is based on our biology, our own design that we have that we are made of. It is a complex system of feedback and emotions and feelings that are physical without which we cannot feel love. So our own nature dictates much about how we act or how we are due to our design. And for some like myself you can attribute that to a creator or God and that tends to make us feel better about ourselves and when we try to imagine a better design we are just not able to at all. We have looked many times at what we might become being able to modify DNA but at no time yet has anyone been able to improve what we were born with. This fragile body, this brain, these thumbs, these eyes, we just can't imagine ourselves improved by some better design. We can look at all the other living creatures and not see one we would rather be, except people who are creatively imaging they are a cat or dog in a human body, and well we don't know much about them like we don't know much about what it is like to be a bat. So we just tend to deal with generalities and not minorities or abberations from the norm. You mentioned Dirac and he is completely wrong there is no antimatter, but again physics just honors him and pretends there is at CERN, and that is like Hegel that academia worships who believed that everything had an opposite. So lets do a test right now and look around your room do you see anything that has an opposite? That table? That carpet? That ham sandwich on your plate? What is the opposite of a ham sandwich? (That is what I ask Hegelians just to piss them off lol) now look outside, do you see anything outside that has an opposite? That tree, that flower, that stone on the ground? Anything at all? How curious is that? To believe such nonsense and to go forth and insist that we must find some reason in peer review to say no you are wrong we are thee antitheists, since there must be, or else we can't have a synthesis. Well there is a small portion of the population out there including Elon Musk who are moving into the future faster than academia can write text books, that we live in a simulation. And people like myself who can prove it. But not here and not now. Why? You would call me a nut. So you don't get to know. You have to stay in Plato's cave. But it is warm and cozy in there. Not scary at all except around every corner or in a traffic jam in America where everyone is armed and denagerous. Some men are made of gold, some are made of silver, and some are made copper. And some are diamonds but in the rough. Men and women of course not just men. Do I need to go further and say and everything between those two and beyond? There is no anti gravity. There is a big bang and it is exploding outward. The actual free lunch of the universe and it does not have an opposite and gravity is the force of being in the way of expanding matter. Einstein said, when told that a guy fell off the roof and hit the ground, he said no the ground came up to meet him. You see your atoms have intrinsic mass and as such it take force to move you and so you would not fall you would stay there until something moves you like an earth that is expanding reducing the difference between you and the ground. Gravity is the force pressing up against your feet. It has no gravitons. But people cannot grasp concepts like this. Even for a physicist it is very difficult to understand things like the Cosmological constant. What Einstein called his greatest blunder and which we have been forced to revive. lol I renamed it dark energy on his behalf much to the chagrin of Penrose. Does that mean it is anti gravity? No, those spherical waves I mentioned they are doing what? They are forcing things apart. Magnetism. What is dark energy? Magnetism. But here you see you need to know what that really is. Take two like poles two magnets push them together feel how spongy that is? That is the wave energy and you know that em waves just keep on going and combining and come off of planets with combined force. Why do we find free electrons? When they are little bits of dust you mean? lol an electron is a measurement. That is all it ever was. You have a cup in your hand, and you dip it into the water, and if it fills that cup, you call it an electron, and you calibrate your equipment to find electrons that are the size of a cup. What happens if you only get half of cup of liquid? Well then its not an electron is it? The equipment will not register an electron, until it is the a full cup of liquid. So then you again speak of math as being fundamental. Well if hardware comes before software then it is a property of the hardware and without that it would not work. You would not have hardware that functions if it did not do so consistently and in the way in which it does. The fact that we expand on 2+2=4 to create a universe in our mind, merely shows that whoever created us knew what he was or she or it was doing. They say charge is fundamental, do they know where it comes from, a spark, like the charge of a cannon. Like a caveman in Plato's cave who saw sparks, and for the life of him did not know that the heck that was. And still don't. They make photon traps and look at them with their eyes, and never think that to see it you need to have one in your eye. They make videos of photons they have slowed down so they can be filmed, never thinking that everything about film viewing is photons again not just there but to be there must also be in your eye. Those are em waves again only not spherical those are transverse waves that shoot out where two spherical waves clash, transferring momentum through the ether bubbles from one to the next until they press against your eye where that physical pressure tells your sight center that is blue, red, green etc based merely on the pressure. F=ma Be reassured that all that I have told you here today is known by very many people, we just keep it secret and make microchips and micro-biology and advanced scientific equipment and A. I. and use language like math, and use the standard model of physics knowing full well it is nowhere near the truth, lol we merely encode our work in that language so that it is always crazy enough honoring Bohr, like we honor Einstein, and Newton. and so many others. Do we laugh at professors? Of course not, they too have their lot in life. I would not be here telling you all this if I did not respect academia and the tireless work they do. But every now and then they too are entitled to a little truth. Again thanks for the video.