So what do we know about our future plans?

[Rick1234567S]

Well there has been a great deal of secrecy here over the years and we have been on a need to know basis.

Along with that disinformation is spread constantly to further muddy the waters, and all our sources of information periodically lie to us, to render all their true information absolutely useless.

So essentially given that we cannot trust our sources at all, it is all guess work.

And very frustrating trying to plan under these circumstances.

It is so bad that way it all appears like fantasy, dreams and imagination, by a dying civilization, too sick and pathetic, to be able to face the facts, as they slowly turn into a smudge in the strata to be found some day, by some alien race, digging in the ground here.

[Rick1234567S]

So as far as we know, our small group here are the aliens who found that smudge in the strata 2 billion years later and having access to historical records researched it and this is what we discovered, that which has been pasted onto the surface of this planet approximately 200 years ago.

And so what we find are things in Egypt that we cannot explain, like evidence that some technology must have been used to create these artifacts like stone vases, and rock carved in such a way as to be impossible to create without some advanced technology.

Youtube is full of examples of that and I can quote some research here...

And in fact all it takes to destroy the entire scientific paradigm here is a single painting found in a church.

This painting from 1600 that has antennas on a sphere being used for communications to learned men, 280 years before any technology was invented that required antennas. Radio waves discovered in 1890.

So in accounting there is a saying that you should look for the penny, not the missing million, but the penny that leads you to the missing million.

So here is the penny the painting called The Glorification of the Eucharist...

Let me ask google why that is there...

and it lies.

The "antennas" you are seeing in the 1600 painting The Glorification of the Eucharist are likely not antennas but rather symbolic elements of religious art, possibly representing something like the monstrance or a specific type of liturgical object that has a radiating design. The perception of these features as antennas is a misinterpretation that arose from the object's appearance, which bears a superficial resemblance to modern radio technology but has a completely different and historical purpose within the context of the artwork.

Any sane man can clearly see a signal represented as a dove, and a dove approaching the forehead of a learned man.

But you see you cannot now continue a conversation with the google A.I. you only get one question, rendering billions and billions of dollars worth of investment completely useless making A.I. that only know lies not truth.

Since the source of their knowledge is complete lies.

[Rick1234567S]

Given that what do we know?

• Any civilization whose science is based on lies could not possibly progress.
• In fact they would be doomed to self destruct in a relatively short period of time.
• So the time span of all that we have found that includes human bodies is very short.
• For instance given a time span of 2 billion years since then, this colonization seems to have lasted at most 2 million years.
• And that figure is disputed by science here and shortened to about 200,000 years the complete span of modern man.
• With civilization going back approximately 10,000 years only.
• Leaving you to wonder how they managed to make a smudge in the strata at all for others to find.

[Rick1234567S]

So then given what we are working with here is a pack of lies, to try to piece together a logical history is a pointless undertaking.

So then many people look for alternate explanations of what this data is and where it might have come from, and we have theories about that based on our own technological abilities from our own advanced civilization, which is also present here in operation, and kept secret.

For instance kilmaru on a copy of the earth void of people, or Javier from unicosobreviviente doing the same on another copy, solokelen,  who has removed most of his videos, but some can be seen here..., loneuser009 who managed a land line call to solokelen...and more recently Corey from Always Empty Always Alone... and I am certainly not willing to entertain opinions of this my own data from liars cheats and thieves.

Yes at times it looks fake so as to not overly excite the natives here.

We are forced to present the data in such a way as to not destroy their fragile paradigm and belief systems that they cling to for sanity.

[Rick1234567S]

So then since our matrix technology, this data being in a digital simulator, that was brand new in 1992, has copy paste technology of any objects, to create what was here 200 years ago would be merely the job of selecting data from old colonizations that represent them, and then moving the people here by reincarnating them into bodies.

For what purpose?

Well again still today we have not been told the purpose since we in my small group appear to be on a need to know basis, and fed reams of disinformation, to ensure we do not know why.

That does seem strange to us indeed but here we are and not able to leave of our own free will but apparently under some contract that we have agreed to for pay or some benefit to ourselves and perhaps others.

Leaving us to guess based on what we have been told by liars.

The most credible story is that people mainly women wanted to come here to do some match making in a place where there are few rules and circumstances forcing people to behave freely and even irrationally or in desperation, such as for end of the world sex and romance, or similar.

Which sounds like younger people perhaps not wanting to follow in the footsteps of their forefathers or unhappy with a rigid culture that to them made no sense.

Or for people to test a paradigm, an experiment regarding a philosophical belief they have such as dichotomy, or the Hegelian dialectic.

This would require them to be ignorant of physics and philosophical history, perhaps uneducated and found some tings that they could not properly interpret or old equipment of some sort, or they gained access to some equipment through some means and didn't know how it operated.

Maybe found an old stargate ventured through and discovered something, then claimed it as their own, and tried to make something out of what they found at some location or destination.

Since we are only talking about the last 200 years we can probably rule that one out, and just assume it is a group project put together to allow women to try to experience what they have read in Jane Austen's books. Not understanding that she wrote sarcasm, and they took it as a kind of truthful historical telling.

Let me give you an example...from memory so forgive my poor memory and example which is merely as I remember it...

So they are at an estate and girls being outdoors need be very careful or they might get a chill, or injure themselves, fine ladies that they are, and very fragile creatures, well one such young lady ventures out in a small group I believe and twists her ankle, but is rescued by a young man a neighbor who carries her home or similar.

The making of a fine romance, so he uses his charm to tilt her crown as it were take her virginity, with promises of marriage etc., as young men do only to be disappointed when he says to her, I would marry you in an instant, but my Aunt forbids it.

[Rick1234567S]

I still use google A.I. for things that are not mission critical...

"Yes, Jane Austen often used sarcasm and satire in her novels and letters, satirizing popular romantic and sentimental fiction, and sometimes even her own relationships. While some readers in her time, particularly those of high society, enjoyed her work as "comedies of manners" and understood her witty critiques, others, such as Charlotte Bronte, later found her work lacking in depth or emotional weight, unaware of the subtle layers of her satirical commentary."

You might now argue that it is mission critical if the mission was to somehow emerse themselves into the world view of Jane Austen, and to be treated as fine ladies, to ballroom dance with captains of valor etc.

And we do see Rhode Island and the gilded mansions being positioned close enough to the naval academy as to hit a passer by with a rock.

"The old naval academy of Rhode Island was, for many years, the home of the Naval Academy Preparatory School (NAPS) on Naval Station Newport. While NAPS serves the purpose of preparing candidates for the U.S. Naval Academy, it is not the original academy itself, which was established in Annapolis, Maryland, in 1845. Newport served as the historic birthplace of the Navy and hosted other important naval institutions, including the Naval War College starting in 1884"

And so they did all that and we truly do not know when that was or if it was also 2 billion years ago that it took place.

Time here is not linear, since the data has been shared through off planet university and networked and modified and reused apparently many times.,

We see numerous resets and complete disasters like 1964 when the world died screaming once or twice or more times from nuclear war until JFK was assassinated and the data was then again moved forward but now in a different epoch.

One of love peace and ban the bomb.

A cultural revolution...

" The 1960s experienced multiple intertwined revolutions, including the Counterculture Movement challenging traditional norms and advocating for anti-establishment ideals, the Civil Rights Movement fighting for racial equality, and the Sexual Revolution promoting new attitudes toward sexuality. Other key revolutions included the Quiet Revolution in Quebec, which sparked significant social and economic change, and the rise of the New Left political movement. "

Somehow baby boomers apparently played some part in all that leading us to believe that having babies was part of the reason people wanted to come here as if it was not permitted elsewhere.

[Rick1234567S]

So lets shoot ahead to where we brought our advanced culture to Hollywood shortly after 2001, and were engaged with women, empowering them through Victoria Secret, and the women were at the top of their game, enjoying fashion week, in N.Y., so a glimpse into our culture which is different from the cultural revolution of the 60's.

A music video by Kylie Minogue who I was dating remotely and the use of CGI which I was promoting to enhance the song she wrote for me.

And This is not meant to flatter myself by any means, it merely shows the difference between the two cultures and so I am in some way familiar with this and able to show it to you rather than speak or write for pages to illustrate the difference.

For instance in the 60's gays were routinely beaten up in public washrooms and everywhere they outed themselves certainly to be a lesbian was looked upon as an abomination by the general public. Rock Hudson a leading man in Hollywood during the 60's would never publicly admit he was a gay man as a for instance, nor most others, but really only in Hollywood and the fashion industry did they have some protection from abuse and looked upon as eccentric men who were girly boys and harmless. And perhaps in British society where it was seen as jokingly done.

Kylie Minogue all the Lovers.

So here you see an acceptance of humans as bisexual creatures according to anthropology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frv6FOt1BNI

[Rick1234567S]

So in the 60's bisexual women however were coming into Vogue and that is easily illustrated by Jane Fonda in the film Barbarella...more visible in the outtakes available online in google images or wherever.

Jane would not openly admit she was bisexual she merely said in her book that her husband Ted Turner made her, do things.

And we can imagine all that for ourselves.

So sexual revolution like wife swapping and threesomes and even orgies came into Vogue and some attempts to bring homosexuality into the mainstream like the x-rated film Caligula 1979 for instance. So by 1979 things had become more liberal minded.

Moving forward to 2010 the date of the Kylie Minogue video being gay required parades every years and the acceptance that people had free choice and could pursue their own gender equality.

I was in Hollywood to prove scientifically that humans were not monogamous and still today science refuses to believe the obvious there.

They make the claim humans are involved in serial monogamy, and for us we see the law enforcing that otherwise it would not be true.

So again a pack of lies and using humans as breeders for some purpose or purposes, frowning down on anything that might depart from that strategy by the powers that be.

Overpopulation clearly not something these orchestrators worry about at all.

Breeding humans like farm animals to produce hybrids and different body shapes and styles, different looks, and using the shot gun approach making a billion of them in the off chance they will get a unique beauty.

Which tells us that the orchestrators of this project are probably from an archaic age still.

Since in my world off planet we have a transformer machine that writes DNA code and people are designed by computers.

So again these people cut off from the larger herd, colonizing perhaps a zoo or depository of designs from the university biology lab.

[Rick1234567S]

And we can look at the people I mentioned who are on copies of the earth, where very easily all humans are removed as objects in the data.

All species of biology again objects in the simulator that can be removed from the code and exist only as code in the simulator.

They are not removing the animals or bugs since then the earth would look like any modern planet which has no biology of this kind whatsoever and this type of thing used only for gaming.

So real time where we are now is 2 billion years into the future when compared to this data we are using.

Step out of this data you are 2 billion years into the future.

So its value is as a toy of sorts that is different and even contains people from that era, and as such is interesting and different, and useful for entertainment or old fashioned ideas like ballroom dancing with captains of valor, to engage in romance and animal behaviors such as mating and child birth and a pretend existence that it happens all by itself, as part of nature leaving no one to blame for anything.

And that would include their sexuality where they can easily make the claim the God made them like this.

As far as proving monogamy is a false you only need listen to one sing from the 50's...

Hank Williams - Love Sick Blues...

I got a feelin' called the blues, oh Lord
Since my baby said goodbye
Lord, I don't know what I'll do
All I do is sit and sigh, oh Lord

That last long day, she said goodbye
Well Lord, I thought I would cry
She'll do me, she'll do you
She's got that kind of lovin'

Edit: And so right here he says she is dating more than one man and that was very common all through recent history for a woman to date different men and then decide on one or more I suspect according to law if she chose to marry. Although if she chose to marry any other men she remained with would be in secret.

Lord, I love to hear her when she calls me sweet da-a-addy

Such a beautiful dream
I hate to think it's all over
I've lost my heart it seems
I've grown so used to you somehow
Well, I'm nobody's sugar daddy now
And I'm lo-o-onesome
I got the lovesick blues

Well, I'm in love, I'm in love with a beautiful gal
That's what's the matter with me
Well, I'm in love, I'm in love with a beautiful gal
But she don't care about me
Lord, I tried and tried to keep her satisfied
But she just wouldn't stay
So now that she is leavin'
This is all I can say

I got a feelin' called the blues, oh Lord
Since my baby said goodbye
Lord, I don't know what I'll do
All I do is sit and sigh, oh Lord

That last long day she said goodbye
Well Lord, I thought I would cry
She'll do me, she'll do you
She's got that kind of lovin'
Lord, I love to hear her when she calls me sweet da-a-addy

Such a beautiful dream
I hate to think it's all over
I've lost my heart it seems
I've grown so used to you somehow
Lord, I'm nobody's sugar daddy now
And I'm lo-o-onesome
I got the lovesick blues

And we can hear the song here...

"Lovesick Blues" is a Tin Pan Alley song, composed by Cliff Friend, with lyrics by Irving Mills. It first appeared in the 1922 musical "Oh, Ernest", ...- wiki

The recordings by Griffin and Miller inspired Hank Williams to perform the song during his first appearances on the Louisiana Hayride radio show in 1948. Receiving an enthusiastic reception from the audience, Williams decided to record his own version despite initial push back from his producer Fred Rose (a former 1920s Tin Pan Alley songwriter) and his band.

Lovesick Blues | Emmett Miller & His Georgia Crackers | 1928

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkLuNaBb-MA

Hank Williams Lovesick Blues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjvn28M-lQY

[Rick1234567S]

And yes you could argue that that is merely a case of serial monogamy so let me ask you as if you were a half-wit, has a woman ever cheated on her husband?

And lets ask google A.I.

"Humans are generally considered "socially monogamous," meaning they tend to form long-term pair bonds and co-parent offspring, though this is not a universal or strictly natural state. While genetic monogamy is rare, humans often exhibit a degree of polygamous tendencies or practice non-monogamy in various forms, making the human mating system complex and variable across cultures and individuals."

So I did accomplish my mission in Hollywood to my satisfaction.

And certainly people date all the time and are not monogamously doing so, but rather date pretty much whoever they want to even once married.

There are punishments for that but it has nothing to do with nature or natural behaviors as if they were love birds.

The idea that women are chattel, or property owned by men is deep rooted in culture here on earth.

The human male ego threatened their masculinity threatened by women who do not follow cultural rules and obey their husband etc.

[Rick1234567S]

So in high society where marriages might be arranged marriages for monetary benefit, there is a deeper understanding of what a marriage is, in terms of long term relationship, in order to strengthen family ties, or to forge alliances, where often romance is involved but not as much of a prime mover as maintaining their fortune.

So in films you see the husband understand his wife is cheating on him with the tennis instructor saying things like "Really dear you should be more careful, during your outings, and those visits to your Aunt, who I saw in Delaware last week, while you were at her estate visiting her due to her illness."

"Oh Reginald, must you be such a bore?'

And this is what they seem to want to be engaged in for some strange reason.

[Rick1234567S]

Wilt the stilt, Chamberlain certainly not monogamous...

"Wilt Chamberlain claimed in his 1991 autobiography "A View From Above" that he had slept with over 20,000 women in his lifetime, a statement that became part of his legendary persona but is widely considered an unbelievable feat. The number itself was intended to illustrate that sex was as significant a part of his life as basketball was."

Gene Simmons from the rock band Kiss, certainly not monogamous...

"Gene Simmons Kept Names And Photos Of 5,000 Sexual Partners, Then Burned The Evidence With His Wife https://rockcelebrities.net/gene-simmons-kept- names-and-photos-of-5000-sexual-partners-then- burned-the-evidence-with-his-wife/ Most of them were guys ! Did he burn all his old wigs too?"

This is where google A.I. fell down...

Let's try again since it seems to be hallucinating...

https://guitar.com/news/music-news/gene-simmons-on-sleeping-with-nearly-5000-women-we-wanted-to-be-the-beatles-on-steroids/

[Rick1234567S]

My informed professional opinion?

I think humans are by their nature bi-sexual, and using sentience can decide who they want to engage in the act of sex with, and love is a complex function that comes in many varieties such as romantic or platonic, and not easily quantified since it is a personal ting.

I think culture and upbringing does affect their opinion and nature and nurture based on life experience comes into play, and it comes down to your gut feeling regarding what your choice is and what you enjoy and what you do not enjoy.

To try to make some sort of blanket statement they are this or they are that is not feasible.

In terms of acceptance what makes people in society in public uncomfortable no matter what it is, is regulated by law.

Se we managed to get America to vote on gay marriage and federally they opted out.

So how does this affect our future plans elsewhere?

Well again that depends on who is there and what their comfort level is. If this is their heaven we are going to then they should all be in complete comfort and not made uncomfortable by others.

So compatibility is important when grouping humans.

[Rick1234567S]

So then since I can only truly speak for myself, in terms of compatibility, at this point after searching my entire life, given that people might change their opinions over time who they are compatible with, I find myself compatible with Nicola, Hailey, And Maisie.

Although I can coexist with almost anyone, when it comes to long term relationships even friendships then compatibility is important.

How do they feel about me?

Well I am more certain about Maisie than the other two since I have spent more time and done more things with Maisie than the other two.

If I had to pick one to begin with then of course it would be Maisie and it has been Maisie as plan one for several years now.

That is all I can say on that matter.

[Rick1234567S]

Maisie's body and my body for the future our bodies are already there since we beamed to the new galaxy together so it is just a matter of moving us into our bodies there and then we would finish the work that has not yet been done like the transporters etc.