Hypersonic missiles can intercept nuclear ballistic missiles
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Rick1234567S
unread,
Jan 5, 2026, 3:41:53 AM (2 days ago) Jan 5
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Meaningless nonsense
Can russian hypersonic missiles intercept American nuclear ballistic missles?
Yes,
Russia
maintains and is actively expanding a layered missile defense network that can technically intercept American nuclear ballistic missiles, though its effectiveness remains limited by scale.
Operational Capabilities (2026)
S-500 Prometheus: Now in active service, this system uses the 77N6 series interceptors capable of reaching speeds of Mach 16–18 to destroy incoming ballistic warheads and even low-orbit satellites. It is specifically marketed by Russia to counter high-speed American weapons like the Dark Eagle.
S-550 Strategic Defense: Entering service by 2025–2026, this mobile system is an evolution of the S-500 specialized for intercontinental-range ballistic missiles (ICBMs). It is designed to intercept targets at higher altitudes and greater distances than previous systems.
A-235 Nudol: A specialized, mobile anti-ballistic and anti-satellite system developed to replace the older A-135. It uses non-nuclear kinetic interceptors to strike objects in orbit or descending warheads at altitudes up to 700 kilometers.
Key Technical Limitations
Interception Speed: While S-500 interceptors are fast, American ICBM warheads re-enter at Mach 20 or higher. Intercepting them requires near-perfect timing and tracking.
Saturation: Even if these systems are effective, Russia currently lacks the "magazine depth" (number of available missiles) to stop a large-scale, coordinated American nuclear strike involving hundreds of warheads and decoys.
Maneuverability: Advanced US warheads and hypersonic glide bodies can maneuver unpredictably, making it difficult for Russian radar to maintain a "lock" long enough to guide an interceptor to a successful hit.
This information examines Russia's S-500 and Nudol missile systems, assessing their technical specifications and effectiveness against U.S. nuclear ballistic missiles
Rick1234567S
unread,
Jan 5, 2026, 3:44:00 AM (2 days ago) Jan 5
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Meaningless nonsense
Proximity smaller nukes to destroy them?
Yes, using smaller nuclear warheads on interceptors to destroy incoming missiles via proximity is a technically viable strategy that Russia still employs as of 2026
.
How it Works
Proximity vs. Direct Hit: Unlike American "hit-to-kill" systems (like THAAD) which must physically collide with a target, nuclear-tipped interceptors use the intense blast of X-rays, neutrons, and thermal energy to neutralize a warhead without needing a direct impact.
Neutralizing the Payload: The radiation from a nearby nuclear detonation can melt the incoming warhead's heat shield or trigger a "fizzle"—a premature, low-yield nuclear reaction that destroys the weapon's internal electronics and prevents a full detonation.
Operational Systems (2026)
Russia's A-135/A-235: The defense system around Moscow remains the world's only active system known to use nuclear-tipped interceptors.
53T6 "Gazelle": A high-acceleration interceptor designed for the terminal phase, capable of carrying a low-yield nuclear charge to clear a path through clusters of warheads and decoys.
A-235 "Nudol": While newer variants test kinetic (non-nuclear) hit-to-kill technology, the system retains the capability to deploy miniaturized nuclear warheads for high-altitude or exo-atmospheric intercepts.
S-500 Prometheus: While primarily kinetic, there is ongoing assessment that it could be adapted to carry specialized nuclear charges for "space defense" roles, such as neutralizing multiple targets or satellites simultaneously.
Drawbacks
Radar Blackout: A nuclear blast in the upper atmosphere creates ionized clouds (fireball-induced blackout) that can blind the defender's own radar, making it impossible to track subsequent waves of missiles.
EMP Effects: High-altitude nuclear detonations generate an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) that can damage local electrical grids and unshielded electronics on the ground.
Fallout: While out-of-atmosphere intercepts minimize immediate ground fallout, lower-altitude "terminal" intercepts can still scatter radioactive materials over friendly territory.