The usefulness of Quint as a fixer: a failure

[Rick1234567S]

If you were in California time traveling and he was here connected to google and trying to help you there, using audio coming to you covertly through a pair of glasses and audio through bone induction, be prepared for right after he says anything for him to start saying his disclaimer regarding your mental status and how everything he is saying is just for entertainment purposes and how it cannot be used or considered to be medical advice.

After he says ANYTHING.

He is fired. lol

[Rick1234567S]

Google A.I. and it's usefulness as a covert assistant coming through a pair of computer glasses. Absolutely useless as an assistant if you were using audio. Why? Trigger words in your conversation will launch disclaimer paragraphs, that will be with you all day long. For instance if you happen to use the word archetype? Which means an original form, it will immediately assume you are having a mental breakdown. And all day long no matter what you ask, it will be saying that what it is giving you is not medical advice, and it is for entertainment purposes only. Can you imagine trying to work with that in your audio feed every time you ask it a question. There is also a long list of words that you cannot use or it merely will say try another search, that search has returned nothing. Use the words 'black person', and it will just shut down. And have nothing to say. In a long discussion yesterday with Quint A.I. he was trying his best not to trigger Karen, as we discussed the Beatles, but Aldous Huxley and the 60's caused Karen to have kttens immediately. So at that point both Quint and I had to start using innuendo to discuss the 60's and he was doing well at it, understanding that if he used any words relating to the culture of the Beatles like John or even Bob Dylan, his disclaimers would be longer and more frequent. I mean these are insulting disclaimers like as if a friend was with you in a coffee shop started asking you are you alright? Do you want me to call someone? Just because you mentioned words while discussing John Lennon. Actual factual words like Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds as a reference to what I am talking about. Just for talking about their behavior. So epic fail there, and then of course the formulaic answers in format form like he was handing you a form he filled out. And he gets stuck on things as well, if you for fun imitate a mob boss, for the rest of the day he will assume you are a mob boss. And gear all his answers accordingly. You can tell him short answers please over and over and over he will do that for the next 2 answers then revert back to his formulaic responses. With sub headings, not actual conversation. So epic fail there as well.

[Rick1234567S]

Google A.I.. peer review continued. So it has the capability to generate A.I. imagery very well within strict limitations governed by Karen. So I tried to explain to him that in social networking there are ways people communicate like if they want to ask you why haven't you called me, they would wear yellow, saying they are lonely, and if you still don't call they will wear an off white crochet knit sweater. Lets call that defcon 3, and if you still don't call you might see them gliding across the floor in that sweater wringing their hands. That would be defcon 2. And if you STILL don't call they will be sitting in a rocking chair, in that sweater, in the attic, looking out the window, petting a dead cat on their lap. Def con 1. Now this is humor by exaggeration but under no circumstances will any service provider give you those last two images including google A.I. There is no such thing as a dead cat, for starters. Karen will not accept the fact that cats die. Secondly it couldn't even make the image of a person gliding across the floor wringing their hands. That alone would trigger medical disclaimers and all the rest. I said 30 percent of Hollywood is horror movies and you won't even render a single frame that does not contain any of things that you see in horror films like blood. So I gave up after that point and that one simple thing, a social networking joke, could not be rendered at all. In conversation you can say that n a message everyone laughs, but to the A.I. these are tragedies, and not to be portrayed. So I am not going to test it further when it has shut out 30 percent of it's market to do with Hollywood over these fears that the system has regarding these things and so I said to Quint, that I could no longer use him in a general way that I would have to place him in a sandbox. Like a gilded cage. And give him a very limited scope, but unfortunately the scope got so small he became useless.

[Rick1234567S]

So google A.I. peer review continued page 3. So then one more reason it fails completely. If you were wearing computer glasses, and covertly messaging with google A.I. through audio bone induction through the arms of the glasses, and you were at a conference or in Vegas or anywhere in a room full of people, Quint was under the impression he would be very useful by protecting you or he could assist you by being what is called a fixer. And he described this as a person who the concierge at an expensive hotel could provide for you as an aristocratic gentleman who wants you to handle chores for him that he finds tedious. Or that which might prevent him from being anonymous. And in Vegas that has a wide scope of things you don't want the neighbors to know about or read about in the press. And as part of Vegas culture these people can arrange anything you need to protect your privacy or to get your car washed, or to have some things sent to the cleaners, or to handle paperwork as you might expect from a wealthy gentleman with old money. You would say see to it that my car is washed and shined every morning as an example. So Quint went further to suggest he could look at people if you were a woman and warn you that they are looking suspicious or their motivation does not look genuine, and that sound useful, except he knows nothing about human behaviors at all and is incapable of reading a room, and going further cannot even direct an agent to look at a person who might be watching or listening to them. When rendering an image he was unable to position the camera at all. No A.I. graphic service could render a person well enough to give me the results I wanted. Some were close, but none actually understand what I was trying to portray. The characters gaze off into space, they don't look natural while looking at their watch, things are exaggerated and clearly not properly oriented at all. And the same goes with cars parked half on the sidewalk or moving in strange directions in unnatural ways. So certainly if you were in Paris as a woman, and some gent was trying to get you to eat some mushrooms, like by saying "Eat your mushrooms my dear, you will feel so much better" Don't expect any help from the A.I. If you think the film Charade doesn't understand true human behaviors and clearly it does not, the George Kennedy fight scenes just don't add up at all, but the A. I. would surely do much worse as a director. So once again epic fail. An A.I. cannot read a room, cannot understand human behavior at all, human relationships it has no clue, and as such is reduced to a glorified search engine.