My reply to SHOCKING - Canadian Constitution EXPOSED - You Own Nothing, No RIGHTS, No Freedoms - Privileges ONLY

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Rick1234567S

unread,
Nov 12, 2025, 9:26:23 PMNov 12
to Meaningless nonsense
@Rick1234567S
1 hour ago (edited)
I am reading these comments and I don't see people understanding yet who owns the deed to the land of 90 percent of Canada. Canadians own 5 percent, Native Indians 5 percent, or First Nations People if you believe they are that, the first ones here, and so the guy who has the title, the deed of ownership is King Charles and you act like you can just wave a hand and remove his ownership? He owns the land. And our government doesn't even know that. They say the crown owns the land and they are the crown, like the provinces. Can you imagine our elected representatives don't even know he owns the land.
Canaduh. Spell it right people. Put this prompt in your address bar...
who's name is on the title of crown land?

When Trudeau tried to get the Queen to give the land to Canada, she refused to sign it, saying it was an afront to her dignity, or similar silly phrase. lol

Notice deep mind doesn't even know that.
Put this prompt in there.
The Supreme court of Canada is our highest court, and they will uphold the legal rights of the monarch?

Rick1234567S

unread,
Nov 12, 2025, 9:27:20 PMNov 12
to Meaningless nonsense

The Supreme court of Canada is our highest court, and they will uphold the legal rights of the monarch?
Yes, the Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the country and is the 
ultimate authority on all legal matters, including the interpretation of the Constitution and the legal rights of the Monarch (the Crown). 
The Court upholds the legal rights and powers of the Crown as part of the supreme law of Canada, founded on the rule of law. Actions taken under the authority of the Crown (e.g., decisions made via royal prerogative) are subject to judicial review to ensure they are consistent with the Constitution and statutory law, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 
However, the Court maintains a distinction between these enforceable legal rights and powers and the constitutional conventions that govern their exercise. While conventions are fundamental to the democratic function of government, they are political in nature and not legally enforceable by the Court. The Court's role is to ensure the actions of the executive (which acts in the name of the Crown) are lawful, not to enforce unwritten political customs.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Nov 12, 2025, 9:30:02 PMNov 12
to Meaningless nonsense

who's name is on the title of crown land?
Crown land is a legal term for public land in Canada and the name that appears on the title is 
"His Majesty the King in Right of [Province/Canada]" (e.g., "His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia" or "His Majesty the King in Right of Canada"). 
This title refers to the Canadian state or government, not King Charles III as a private individual. The land is held by the Crown in trust for the public and is administered by the relevant federal or provincial government, depending on where the land is located. 
Key points regarding the name on the title:
  • Provincial Crown Land: The vast majority of land in Canada (about 89%) is Crown land, most of which is under provincial jurisdiction. The title is held in the name of "His Majesty in Right of the Province of [Province Name]".
  • Federal Crown Land: A smaller percentage of land, including national parks, Indigenous reserves, and military bases, is under federal jurisdiction. The title is held in the name of "His Majesty in Right of Canada".
  • Public administration: The land is managed by the appropriate government ministries (such as the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations in British Columbia) on behalf of all Canadian citizens.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Nov 12, 2025, 9:33:30 PMNov 12
to Meaningless nonsense
What does the constitution say about the legal right of the monarch?
In the 
Canadian Constitution, both 
legal rights (the codified law) and constitutional conventions hold significant "clout," but they operate differently and are essential to the functioning of the system.
Legal Rights (Codified Law)
The written Constitution (primarily the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Constitution Act, 1982) explicitly vests all executive, legislative, and judicial power in the Monarch (the Crown). These are legal powers and rights, which can be enforced by the courts. 
Key legal rights include:
  • Executive Power: Section 9 of the Constitution Act, 1867, states the executive power of and over Canada "is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen".
  • Legislative Role: Parliament consists of the King, the Senate, and the House of Commons. Royal Assent is legally required for a bill to become law. The King also has the legal power to disallow (annul) provincial legislation within two years, a power that has not been used in decades.
  • Commander-in-Chief: Formal command-in-chief of the Canadian Armed Forces is vested in the Monarch.
  • Appointment Powers: The power to appoint senators, judges, and the Governor General is formally a right of the Crown (exercised by the Governor General or Monarch). 
Constitutional Conventions
Conventions are unwritten, traditional rules of behaviour that are not legally enforceable by a court, but are considered to be binding rules of political conduct. They are the "unwritten part of the Constitution" that ensure responsible government in a democratic society. 
Conventions dictate that the Monarch's legal powers are exercised on the "advice" of the elected government (the Prime Minister and Cabinet). For example: 
  • Royal Assent is always given: By convention, the Governor General virtually always grants Royal Assent to bills passed by the House and Senate; it has not been refused in the modern era.
  • Non-partisan role: The Monarch and their representatives (the Governor General and Lieutenant Governors) remain strictly non-partisan and do not get involved in political decision-making, even though they hold the legal authority.
  • Responsible Government: The government must maintain the confidence of the House of Commons to remain in power, a fundamental convention not found in statute books. 
Which has more clout?
Both are crucial to the Canadian constitutional order:
  • Legal rights provide the formal structure and the ultimate source of state authority (the Crown). They are the "skeleton" of the constitution.
  • Conventions provide the "flesh and blood," making the system function democratically by ensuring that the formal legal powers of the Crown are exercised by democratically accountable ministers. 
In exceptional circumstances (a "constitutional fire extinguisher" role), the reserve powers, which are a mix of legal prerogative and convention, may be used unilaterally by the Monarch's representatives to ensure the continuity and stability of government or prevent an abuse of power (e.g., dismissing a Prime Minister who refuses to resign after losing a confidence vote). The interplay between these two elements is what defines Canada's system of government.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Nov 12, 2025, 9:37:16 PMNov 12
to Meaningless nonsense
3 times now I have beaten deep mind and that is essential that I can beat it, or else it would end up with more authority than I have and what chance would humans have in some sort of mutiny?

It is not that I am so brilliant maybe I am well schooled, but the way the system works is humans tend to lie and so deep mind only has what he finds as truth, and cannot distinguish between a fib or a bit of political rhetoric and actual facts.
In general people don't put all their secrets onto public web pages for a variety of reasons.
Too controversial, or they might lose their competitive edge, or they have an agenda.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages