Hello,
There is problem with current consumption in Bluetooth applications and current version of mbed SDK.
I'm using nRF51822-EK board for tests.
I created test project based on BLE_HeartRate example with last versions of libraries: mbed-src, nRF51822, BLE_API.
/* mbed Microcontroller Library * Copyright (c) 2006-2013 ARM Limited * * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. * You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ #include "mbed.h" #include "BLEDevice.h" #include "HeartRateService.h" #include "BatteryService.h" #include "DeviceInformationService.h" BLEDevice ble; const static char DEVICE_NAME[] = "Nordic_HRM"; static const uint16_t uuid16_list[] = {GattService::UUID_HEART_RATE_SERVICE, GattService::UUID_BATTERY_SERVICE, GattService::UUID_DEVICE_INFORMATION_SERVICE}; static volatile bool triggerSensorPolling = false; void disconnectionCallback(Gap::Handle_t handle, Gap::DisconnectionReason_t reason) { ble.startAdvertising(); // restart advertising } void periodicCallback(void) { /* Note that the periodicCallback() executes in interrupt context, so it is safer to do * heavy-weight sensor polling from the main thread. */ triggerSensorPolling = true; } int main(void) { Ticker ticker; ticker.attach(periodicCallback, 1); ble.init(); ble.onDisconnection(disconnectionCallback); /* Setup primary service. */ uint8_t hrmCounter = 100; HeartRateService hrService(ble, hrmCounter, HeartRateService::LOCATION_FINGER); /* Setup auxiliary services. */ BatteryService battery(ble); DeviceInformationService deviceInfo(ble, "ARM", "Model1", "SN1", "hw-rev1", "fw-rev1", "soft-rev1"); /* Setup advertising. */ ble.accumulateAdvertisingPayload(GapAdvertisingData::BREDR_NOT_SUPPORTED | GapAdvertisingData::LE_GENERAL_DISCOVERABLE); ble.accumulateAdvertisingPayload(GapAdvertisingData::COMPLETE_LIST_16BIT_SERVICE_IDS, (uint8_t *)uuid16_list, sizeof(uuid16_list)); ble.accumulateAdvertisingPayload(GapAdvertisingData::GENERIC_HEART_RATE_SENSOR); ble.accumulateAdvertisingPayload(GapAdvertisingData::COMPLETE_LOCAL_NAME, (uint8_t *)DEVICE_NAME, sizeof(DEVICE_NAME)); ble.setAdvertisingType(GapAdvertisingParams::ADV_CONNECTABLE_UNDIRECTED); ble.setAdvertisingInterval(1600); /* 1000ms; in multiples of 0.625ms. */ ble.startAdvertising(); while (true) { if (triggerSensorPolling) { triggerSensorPolling = false; /* Do blocking calls or whatever is necessary for sensor polling. */ /* In our case, we simply update the dummy HRM measurement. */ hrmCounter++; if (hrmCounter == 175) { hrmCounter = 100; } hrService.updateHeartRate(hrmCounter); } else { ble.waitForEvent(); } } }
And results is that in advertising state device consumes 5uA in low-power mode (ble.waitForEvent()) with small current spikes when device send advertising packets. But when I connect to the device the current consumption rise up to 1mA continuous consumption with small spikes when device receive/send packets. When disconnecting device once again start advertising and consumes 5uA in low-power mode.
My assumption is that when in connected state somewhere HFCLK Timer is used instead of low-power timer based on RTC1.
Can someone check it out?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.![]()
It seems it's more related to the BLE_API library so I reposted it here:
mbedmicro/BLE_API#1
And closed this issue.
Closed #670.