You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Maxent
Hi all,
One of my sample sites has a much higher detection probability than my
other sampling areas, which causes my Maxent model to wrongly
associate landscape variables from this one site to the species. Is
there a way within Maxent to adjust the model to account for these
differences in detection probabilities?
Thanks,
Laura
John B
unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 7:07:29 PM2/6/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to max...@googlegroups.com
I think that the issue you describe is effectively the same as that faced when we use occurrence datasets that include sites/environments that are more frequently sampled than others (i.e. spatial and/or environmental sampling bias).
You could use a bias grid to generate a background sample with similar bias (or else supply your own, similarly biased background sample), which I believe should cancel the bias out.