Hi Pankaj:
In a similar study of mine, I ran all variables and removed those that have zero contribution (based on advice from an expert in SDM field). I then used the remaining variables in my model....
Using bioclimatic variables only, I obtained a different set of contribution of variables compared to using both bioclimatic, land use, topography etc together.
My advice is (though may not be absolutely right), use different combinations of variables as for example, if vegetation contributes more to bird distributions in a location, we should not forget that vegetation cannot act in isolation; rainfall parameters are as well important.
Having said that, it is good to point out in your study that your results are based on the variables you considered.
Not sure if you can pick anything from this?