Going distributed?
Robert Munteanu
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
Taylor Leese
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind. I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past. Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
Manuel Grau
--
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
Rodolfo Hansen
I've just been procrastinating.� To github we go!
On 10/14/2011 10:17 AM, Manuel Grau wrote:
I told him the same. So +1 for me too
2011/10/14 Taylor Leese <tlee...@gmail.com>
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind.� I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past.� Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
On Oct 14, 2011 2:19 AM, "Robert Munteanu" <robert....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
--
Manuel Grau Aracil
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven�t found it yet, keep looking" Steve Jobs.
Robert Munteanu
I've updated the ohloh enlistment to reflect the new repository: https://www.ohloh.net/p/gae-maven-plugin .
One mention though , we seem to have lost the open issues. Is there a CSV export somewhere? It might be useful to keep the old bugs and feature requests.
Robert
I told myself the same too... :P
I've just been procrastinating. To github we go!
On 10/14/2011 10:17 AM, Manuel Grau wrote:
I told him the same. So +1 for me too
2011/10/14 Taylor Leese <tlee...@gmail.com>
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind. I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past. Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
On Oct 14, 2011 2:19 AM, "Robert Munteanu" <robert....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
--
Manuel Grau Aracil
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking" Steve Jobs.
--
Sent from my (old) computer
Rodolfo Hansen
�
;)
On 10/18/2011 03:19 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
Great, thanks!
I've updated the ohloh enlistment to reflect the new repository: https://www.ohloh.net/p/gae-maven-plugin .
One mention though , we seem to have lost the open issues. Is there a CSV export somewhere? It might be useful to keep the old bugs and feature requests.
Robert
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:
I told myself the same too... :P
I've just been procrastinating.� To github we go!
On 10/14/2011 10:17 AM, Manuel Grau wrote:
I told him the same. So +1 for me too
2011/10/14 Taylor Leese <tlee...@gmail.com>
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind.� I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past.� Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
On Oct 14, 2011 2:19 AM, "Robert Munteanu" <robert....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
--
Manuel Grau Aracil
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven�t found it yet, keep looking" Steve Jobs.
Robert Munteanu
Didn't all the bugs magically disappear too ?
;)
On 10/18/2011 03:19 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
Great, thanks!
I've updated the ohloh enlistment to reflect the new repository: https://www.ohloh.net/p/gae-maven-plugin .
One mention though , we seem to have lost the open issues. Is there a CSV export somewhere? It might be useful to keep the old bugs and feature requests.
Robert
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:
I told myself the same too... :P
I've just been procrastinating. To github we go!
On 10/14/2011 10:17 AM, Manuel Grau wrote:
I told him the same. So +1 for me too
2011/10/14 Taylor Leese <tlee...@gmail.com>
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind. I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past. Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
On Oct 14, 2011 2:19 AM, "Robert Munteanu" <robert....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
--
Manuel Grau Aracil
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking" Steve Jobs.
--
Sent from my (old) computer
Rodolfo Hansen
And I attached the csv export, is there a quick way to import it into github?
So much for "hiding things under the rug" ... :p
On 10/18/2011 03:29 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:
Didn't all the bugs magically disappear too� ?
�
;)
�
On 10/18/2011 03:19 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
Great, thanks!
I've updated the ohloh enlistment to reflect the new repository: https://www.ohloh.net/p/gae-maven-plugin .
One mention though , we seem to have lost the open issues. Is there a CSV export somewhere? It might be useful to keep the old bugs and feature requests.
Robert
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:
I told myself the same too... :P
I've just been procrastinating.� To github we go!
On 10/14/2011 10:17 AM, Manuel Grau wrote:
I told him the same. So +1 for me too
2011/10/14 Taylor Leese <tlee...@gmail.com>
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind.� I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past.� Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
On Oct 14, 2011 2:19 AM, "Robert Munteanu" <robert....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
--
Manuel Grau Aracil
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven�t found it yet, keep looking" Steve Jobs.
--
Sent from my (old) computer
Robert Munteanu
http://code.google.com/p/maven-gae-plugin/issues/list
And I attached the csv export, is there a quick way to import it into github?
So much for "hiding things under the rug" ... :p
On 10/18/2011 03:29 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:
Didn't all the bugs magically disappear too ?
;)
On 10/18/2011 03:19 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
Great, thanks!
I've updated the ohloh enlistment to reflect the new repository: https://www.ohloh.net/p/gae-maven-plugin .
One mention though , we seem to have lost the open issues. Is there a CSV export somewhere? It might be useful to keep the old bugs and feature requests.
Robert
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:
I told myself the same too... :P
I've just been procrastinating. To github we go!
On 10/14/2011 10:17 AM, Manuel Grau wrote:
I told him the same. So +1 for me too
2011/10/14 Taylor Leese <tlee...@gmail.com>
I already have a GitHub mirror so it's not really a technical issue. There are a number of benefits to GitHub in my mind. I discussed it briefly with Rodolfo in the past. Perhaps it's time to make it happen. +1 from me, but it's Rodolfo's decision.
- Taylor
On Oct 14, 2011 2:19 AM, "Robert Munteanu" <robert....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the project uses SVN . Now that Google Code offers both Git and Mercurial I think it using one of these lowers the barrier to contribution substantially. Moving to Github would probably be even better, but that's a more disruptive move.
Both Git and Mercurial have migration guides ( http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToGit , http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ConvertingSvnToHg ) , so this is a supported path.
What do you think about this possibility?
Robert
--
Manuel Grau Aracil
Software Engineer at Realex Payments
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking" Steve Jobs.
--
Sent from my (old) computer
--
Sent from my (old) computer
Robert Munteanu
On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:27:22 AM UTC+3, Rodolfo wrote:
Didn't all the bugs magically disappear too� ?
�
;)
Speaking of magic, did anyone get notified of https://github.com/maven-gae-plugin/maven-gae-plugin/pull/1 or do I have to ping the group?
Rodolfo Hansen
Robert Munteanu
No notification here :/
I guess gae-maven-plugin is a 'user' account . Why not set its email address to maven-ga...@googlegroups.com ? We can always switch if we get overwhelmed with pull requests.
Robert