Limbo Game Controls

[Barb Frison]

Forsomeone who spends considerable amount of time playing both PC/console as well as mobile games, Limbo was one of those games that I was really hoping would make it to the mobile platform. And then the developers decided to grant my wish. Available only on iOS for now, Limbo is finally out on the mobile and so we decided to see how well it has translated over to the smaller screen.

Along the way you come across some other children but instead of helping you they only offer more resistance. Eventually, you reach the last level in the game, at which point the game ends abruptly with little explanation of what just happened and what happens next.

Limbo has three basic controls. There is the movement control for moving forward or backward, jump, and grab for holding and dragging objects such as bear traps and crates. On the iOS version, the game does not show a single control on screen, which can cause some confusion. And unlike the desktop/console version, there is no controls screen to show you the controls.

The game basically goes from one puzzle to another and nothing much happens in between. Each level in the game is basically one puzzle and you can jump directly to the one you want (after you unlock them) when you start the game. Your progress gets saved automatically and even synced across devices over iCloud.

Most of the sounds in the game are environmental and the game does this very well. Listen to it on a good pair of headphones and you can hear small things such as the sound of water droplets reverberating inside a cave or the sound of gushing water and the rain. The traps in the game all sound appropriately ferocious, particularly the giant rotating blades that produce terror every time you hear them spin. There are also some lovely sounds of body parts breaking, crushing and disintegrating for your amusement.

Limbo has absolutely no dialogues. There are a few human characters in the game but no one ever speaks. There is no narration as well. Add the glum visuals and the bare bones soundtrack and the game produces a sense of loneliness and despair like no other.

Limbo is one of my favorite games of all times. I love how it manages to achieve so much with so little. The fact that they managed to translate all of that on to the small screen is commendable. True, the controls let down what would have otherwise been a perfect game but even with that shortcoming Limbo manages to conjure sheer brilliance through its darkness.

The experiments were done in the U.S. and the Netherlands and showed how to make this dangerous virus more contagious. Some people worried that revealing the details would be like publishing the recipe for a bioweapon.

"The government led us to understand that there would be a way to share the detailed information with individuals who had a need to know," says Michael Imperiale, a microbiologist at the University of Michigan who serves on the board.

In December, officials said they would try to set up a secure system accessible only to legitimate scientists and public health officials around the world who are trying to prepare for a future flu pandemic.

So the available options seemed to be either publish fully or not at all. That's one big reason why, when the committee weighed the risks and benefits for a second time, it seemed important to publish everything.

"The more complex part of export controls is when it comes to information, rather than equipment," says Alice Gast, president of Lehigh University, who recently co-chaired an expert panel that examined how these laws affect science.

Information produced by basic research is normally exempt, says Gast, who explains that "the fundamental research exemption is valid as long as you are freely and openly sharing the results of the research."

In the case of bird flu, researchers from both groups reluctantly agreed to go along with the board's initial recommendation on limited distribution. While publication was on hold, both U.S. and Dutch export controls kicked in.

Ron Fouchier, a virologist at Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, was at a meeting in London last week and apologized for not being able to discuss his work in detail. "I've been notified by the Dutch government that in contrast to the U.S. government, they have not lifted their export control restrictions," Fouchier said.

Fouchier said he and his lawyers believe that his work is the kind of "basic scientific research" that is excluded under the regulations. On April 23, he'll be at a meeting organized by the Dutch government to consider this whole issue.

A while ago I played through Limbo for the first time. I thought it was quite an interesting experience for many reasons and been thinking for it on and off. Now that I have collected most of my thoughts on the game I thought it was time to write a little post about it.

Starting off, I thought the game had really nice visuals that really added to the mood. Small things, like the change in light level and tilt of the camera heightened the mood substantially. Another thing I really liked was the variety of activities and lack of puzzle repetition. Too many games just try and extend play time as long as possible, and it is nice to see games going in the other direction. All this has been said before though and is not what this post will be about. Instead I want to discuss some other things I realized when playing the game.

Limited Interaction

I think the biggest take-away from Limbo is how you do not have to give the player lots of actions in order to make a fresh and interesting experience. The basic actions in Limbo are move, jump, climb and grab. These are then used in a mixture of ways, constantly keeping the experience fresh by putting the variety in the world instead of the controller. This can be seen in other games like Shadow of the Colossus (but then to a lesser degree), and I think it really helps to heighten the player's feel of presence in the game. It only takes the player the first few minutes of the game to familiarize with the controls and the rest of the game can be spent on building up immersion, instead of constantly learning and remembering controls.

It is so often that games become about the mastery of the controls and I think that makes it so much harder to become one with the game's world. The faster the flow of interaction from player to game can become intuitive, the better. We do not want players to think of what buttons to press and sticks to pull. Instead we want players to directly express their wishes from mind to game, unaware of any intermediate hardware.

Puzzles and Limits

As I played Limbo I realized that most (if not all) interactions were directly added to the puzzles you have to solve. I felt that there could have been tons of extra elements to interact with in order to make the player feel more connected to the world.

But then I realized that the design of the game went against this. The puzzles in Limbo depend a lot on experimentation and thinking "out of the box". You have to try out every object in order to find a way to progress. If the game had had superfluous elements, then this would have made the experience so much harder. Players probably would have spent much time interacting with objects that were completely unrelated to the puzzle they were trying to solve, increasing the overall frustration and damaging the flow of progress.

This means that puzzles can be quite a hindrance if you want to make a living world. If the player's goal is to solve puzzles, then that forces you into make sure the rest of the experience supports this. And because of this having puzzles excludes a lot of things that could increase the player presence, emotional connection or just about anything that might work against the puzzle solving.

This is one reason why we will try to completely remove puzzles for our upcoming game (more on that in another post).

Trial and Error

I just have to mention the trial-and-error nature of Limbo as it is something that I have talked a lot about before and it is quite a prominent feature in the game. First of all, the "repeat and try again" mechanic that is used in almost every puzzles is something that ties into the general design of the game. It is quite clear that it takes the basic design from Another World but I link Limbo is a lot less frustrating.

What I found interesting is that the most annoying parts were not the puzzles where you died and had to restart, but where you missed some part of a sequence and had go back and try again. This mainly because the latter meant you had to redo a lot more and the deaths often had a sort of fun, morbid "gotcha!" mentality to them. Also when the world is reset and the game place you at a certain point you get a greater sense of focus on and a hint that you are on the right track. Just failing to do something always give you that nagging feeling that you might not have set up everything in the proper way.

Still, dying or not, for every time I had to repeat a part of the game, it became less about being present in it's virtual world and and more about figuring out an algorithm. I felt a clear change in my state of mind after just one or two attempts at a section. I am probably a biased here, and thus not best of test subjects, so would be interesting to hear what others felt.

A final note on this: Some people have argued that the cruel death mechanic heightened the tension in the game. However, I think the most important part of creating tension in Limbo was that you never know what to expect next. I never felt any increased tension after having failed once or twice, but instead my greatest tension was from anticipation. Coming closer to some strange branches or a weird contraption, my mind conjured up all sort of imagery of what could happen next. I think this sort of build-up is a lot more powerful, than simply adding cheap engagement from the knowledge that you had to restart (which rarely worked on me anyways).

Cut scenes

The last part I want to discuss are the cut-scenes, or more precisely the lack there of. It is still so common in games that you remove control from the players and then pan/zoom/guide the camera to make sure that the player watches some event (e.g. a creature emerging).

Limbo does not do this, and it makes the events that you see so much more compelling. By using the game's space and character movement as a means of pacing, the events are very well directed, but without ever removing control from the player. I especially liked the villagers that you see running about and thought it was a shame that they were not utilized more. I would have really liked for a more coherent narrative to have come out of these encounters.

End NotesDespite being mainly a game about solving puzzles, I think Limbo gives a lot of hints on atmosphere and narrative in games, both by things that it does good and things that it fails at. I also wish that we could see games with this kind of polish and interesting art direction, that had main focused on creating immersion, atmosphere and a compelling narrative. As seen when investigating games like Limbo, all the tools for creating truly expressive experiences already exists, it is just a matter of putting them to go use!

3a8082e126