UNITE! Info #106en: 6/7 More rattler "NE" writhings
Rolf Martens
[Posted: 30.07.99]
[Continued from part 5/7]
RATTLER WRITHINGS AND SOME STRAIGHT FACTS [ctd.]
XIV. UNSUITABLE "SHYNESS" AGAIN, CONCERNING
"OWN" PREDECESSOR ETC
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"The whole RIM within which the PCP formerly had been a model
party, had been publicly attacked by Rolf Martens since 1994 to
be an 'instrument of the CIA for the encirclement of the PCP'."
Not only - or even mainly - for the "encirclement of the PCP"!
That's one further ridiculous distortion attempt on your part.
What I pointed out from 1994 on was, that things had gone so far
that the "RIM" was now (since late 1993) stabbing its own (pur-
ported) "favourite son", as I wrote or - OK - its (purported)
"model party", as you say, in the back.
The party, I wrote in several postings from 1996 on, the "en-
circlement and suppression" of which the "RIM" to a considerab-
le degree no doubt *had been* constructed as an instrument for,
back in 1980-84, that was none other than "your own" former one,
snakes, the then really revolutionary, and to the reactionaries
*very* dangerous one, the KPD/ML(NEUE EINHEIT). And you know
damn well too that this is what I wrote.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"That we had not unconditionally followed this opinion had
equally been a final proof against Neue Einheit for Rolf Mar-
tens."
Which is just silly of you, snakes.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"On the one hand demands for the unconditional support, on the
other for the unconditional condemnation of parties and coali-
tions of parties. The matter continued. In January, 1998, our
organisation issued the above-mentioned long explanation about
the development of its position concerning the RIM, but Rolf
Martens failed to ever write a statement about that."
As I already said, what need was there for me, as "prosecutor",
to comment on that *clear confession* on your part to that
really big crime which I since long had been pointing out?
XV. COULD YOU HAVE GUESSED IT, OTHER READERS? - ONCE
AGAIN, ONE MORE TIME, THE SHOVING OF OWN FRIENDS
DOWN OTHER PEOPLE'S THROATS REPEATED
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"The whole policy by Rolf Martens in this question aimed at pres-
suring us to subordinate ourselves to these so-called surroun-
dings of the PCP at any rate, which proved utterly shady and
infiltrated with the work of agents."
Here REALLY trying to put it all UPSIDE-DOWN, once more, snakes.
Those "surroundings", the "RIMlers" (both in Germany and else-
where), *you* have engaged in a "pact of silence" with, from
1984/85 on. A "pact" also, from 1985 to 1990, directed against
me, by the way. *I* was the one who started to attack and expose
them, as soon as this was possible for me; I was the one, above
all, who exposed the very character of the "RIM". As for agents,
I exposed Chris Burford - just to take this example again - in
1996, and you two years later precisely teamed up with him, pre-
cisely against me too, isn't that so?
You people today precisely are part of the CIA "surroundings",
precisely are acting in very close liaison also with professio-
nal agents, aginst the revolutionary movement.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"The Group Neue Einheit, resp. the KPD/ML (Neue Einheit) as it
was called previously, remained tough, though, and uninfluenced
by the rabid howling."
Precisely *your* VERY rabid howling *against* Marxism, in com-
plete unison with the (other) agents and an entire openly-revi-
sionist-Trotskyite rabble, as part of that "B-gang" you and some
others formed in connection with the so-called "Marxism-Unmode-
rated" mailing list in June 1998, *was* pretty "tough" and "un-
influenced", wasn't it?
XVI. ON AN IMPORTANT (OR "UNIMPORTANT"?) MARXIST
EXPERIENCE - A QUOTE REPEATED FROM #104EN and #105EN
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"Rolf Martens's demagoguery is also to be seen by the following:
since then, many important statements by our organisation have
appeared, and regularly there came a comment by Rolf Martens
saying that our statement as such was correct, but the authors
were every time inundated with incredible suspicions and accusa-
tions."
Sorry, other readers, but you edifying-snakes more or less are
forcing me to quote, in reply to this, for the third time one
important passage from a 1979 article by "your" former, then ac-
tually revolutionary and quite advanced, party:
'If you judge a party [or a group, or even an indivi-
dual, of course - RM] only by that which it says today,
you overlook completely precisely that decisive weapon
of the bourgeoisie, to have parties serving themselves
which at certain points in time are saying certain
things, only in order once more to betray them.
This is a historical lesson, which must be drawn even
from the behaviour of the opportunists during the first
world war and the time thereafter, those elements who
were scourged by Lenin for their recognizing the dicta-
torship of the proletariat, in order later to trample on
it and to betray it. They were the most dangerous and
evil of all of the agents of the bourgeoisie. One there-
fore must analyse very carefully what a party is repre-
senting and what stands it takes under the changing con-
ditions in society, and must not content oneself with
just some verbal statements which a party is making.'
XVII. ON AN " O M I N O U S L Y S T R O N G F O R C E ",
AND ON 30 LIGHTYEARS
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"In this way he every time attempted to cast doubts upon the po-
sitive impression among the readers, which our organisation had
achieved by its statements, and to hammer his message that they
were dealing with an ominously strong force which propagates
nothing but correct things but, in reality, was something com-
pletely different."
This I like, snakes! I'm "HAMMERING IN" my message, to my poor
readers, that they're dealing with an "OMINOUSLY STRONG FORCE"!
Although I'm just one single person, which I'm making quite
clear to all readers too.
Haven't you - without wanting to - made some propaganda for my
writings here? Marxism, and the truth in general, of which
Marxism is one part, *is* pretty strong, isn't it - because it's
in the interest of the overwhelming majority of all people. And
if I really in some way *have* been able to "create an impres-
sion of a strong force", then mustn't that be (only) because
there *actually is* at least something of Marxism, something of
truth, in what I've written and posted on the Net so far?
I on my part have never said that I've been propagating "nothing
but correct things". Those mistakes which I have made I've ad-
mitted, publicly, as soon as I've found out about them.
That "something-or-other completely different" which you so
"ominously" but impossibly vaguely are saying "might" exist in,
or lie behind, my writings, can I comment on that? Sorry, no.
[NOTE, 03.08.99, after this Info was first posted:
After now having read the last-quoted rattler writhing also in
German, I see that these people did *not* mean to say that I was
"hammering in" a message that *I* was "an ominously strong for-
ce" propagandizing "nothing but correct things..." but "a mes-
sage that *they*[!] were". In English, their grammatically not
quite correct sentence is somewhat ambiguous; the reader is
tempted to guess on what parts of it perhaps (not) to "correct".
Reading it again, I realize that it should rather be taken as
meaning that which they wrote in German too than as containing,
involountarily, some propaganda on their part for *my* writings.
"Bad luck" for me on that one, then! Only, the very idea that I
- who precisely have pointed out how ridiculously those people
have been lying, on a large number of issues, and how totally,
since a decade back now, they've been discrediting themselves
to anybody who's ever cared to take a closer look at their par-
ty or "group" - would even as much as once have written that
*that* entity was a "strong"[!], "always truth-telling"[!] one
was and is so ludicrous that I didn't realize they were actual-
ly trying to put *such* words into my mouth, indeed trying to
put me across as having been "hammering"[!] such a "message".
Instead of as "involountary propaganda for" my writings, the
above-quoted lines must rather be noted as "just" some more
*silly lies about* them. I can "comfort myself" at any rate
with noting too, then, that these at least by far are *the*
silliest lies on this subject, so far, by those people.]
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"Everybody, yet, can follow how the Group Neue Einheit has over
30 years conducted a continuous revolutionary propaganda which
is developing further."
But on this I *can* make a comment, namely: Haha! The "Group
Neue Einheit" "over 30 years"! Your "group" hasn't even, offi-
cially, existed for more than just about *one* year so far!
As late as in mid-1998 it was that you "changed your organiza-
tion's name". You *wanted to* "make a name-change" - that is,
*liquidate* your earlier party - as early as in 1990, didn't
you. Only, you didn't even dare to, for a long time, probably
because of my having pointed out how revealing that would have
been concerning your treason. You took recourse to killing your
party, in practice and on the sly, in 1995, from then on making
its name disappear from all of your publications and "inoffi-
cially", in the follwing three years, *calling* it a "group".
The actually revolutionary KPD/ML(NEUE EINHEIT) died, as such,
at some time in the period between 1984 and 1990, as far as I
can ascertain. At any rate, your "group" *politically* is more
than 30 lightyears away from that former party which was created
in Germany in 1969/70.
XVIII. "SOLIDARIC" RATTLESNAKE AGAIN, AND ON ALLIANCES
AND ON NAMES
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"Thus we only can state that the sympathy movement for the De-
mocratic Republic of Congo has obviously become the field where
this person which is utterly contradictory in its political al-
liances is acting now. This we think a necessary information for
the readers."
A "sympathy movement" in which I've been active for some time,
yes, and whose other participants I of course find it's neces-
sary to warn about what intentions you may have in now saying
you want to join it.
But how have I ever been "contradictory" in my political allian-
ces? You nowhere have even tried to explain this vilification
of yours. [NOTE 03.08.99, after first posting: Well, "tried"
they actually had, on one point, only very unsuccessfully.]
A standpoint of mine on alliances remains, for instance, what
I wrote recently, in Info #104en, and quoted once above too:
'Even in those particular cases, such as yours, where there are
strong reasons to doubt a certain participant's sincerity [in
a solidarity movement, say], others should not because of this
from the start exclude extending such co-operation to that par-
ticipant, in my opinion, but should try to utilize its/his/her
- suspected - hypocrisy too, turning a possible poisonous
snake's venom as far as can be done into a beneficial serum, so
to speak.'
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"Unfortunately, most of our publications so far are available
only in English because our capabilities for French translations
are very limited, regrettably. We shall try to improve this. The
article about Mariátegui is available also in Spanish, as men-
tioned already.
A further case of Rolf Martens is, for example, his calling the
alteration of our organisation's name into Group Neue Einheit
"a heavy crime", an alteration which is completely natural and
has long since been given reasons for in a detailed statement by
us."
No "heavy" crime at all I've called this. I've only pointed out
how *revealing* that "step" of yours has been, in the first
place, and how at least equally revealing that incredible shil-
ly-shallying and confusion over many years, concerning even when
and how to take it, in the second.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"What kind of a heavy crime should it be, if a group takes the
naming Group Neue Einheit as its name and lays off the name
KPD/ML (Neue Einheit) which it cannot bear any longer and which
has been outdated for already some time?
There is hardly anything else to be found in the internet which
is as contradictory as Rolf Martens is. In a certain way his way
of action is also a reaction to the Group Neue Einheit itself
which over many years has been following a correct course which
this man cannot criticize. This drives him towards these defama-
tory statements, which have a long history."
No need to comment on this. Your next lie at least is more
shocking - at least to people who don't know you that well.
XIX. THIS TIME YOU DID GUESS IT, OTHER READERS? - ONE
MORE TIME A RETURN TO THE THEME: SHOVING OWN FRIENDS
DOWN OTHER PEOPLE'S THROATS
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"The actual source from which all the rabble-rousing against the
Group Neue Einheit comes is to be found in the fact that this
group has broken through the machinations around the interna-
tional parties which were connected with the People's Republic
of China of the time of Mao Zedong,...."
Upside-down again, snakes, upside-down!
What *were* these machinations, in what did they consist? For,
instance, and not least, in the *concocting of the "RIM"*, isn't
that so? (NB, I'm not saying that this was the only plot.)
And it was not you but precisely - above all - I who, on the in-
ternational level, *broke through* that machination (as much as
I could, as only one individual). You, precisely on the contra-
ry, *protected* that machination, although it to begin with was
directed not least against "your" very "own" party at that time.
You *joined* that plot yourselves, now *helping* the CIA.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"...in the fact that it has in particular thoroughly disturbed
und destroyed the attempts from the part of the US rightists to
occupy this movement for themselves."
The US rightists! Precisely. The ones *you* during more than a
decade have been helping - and still today too are helping -
occupy that movement. The ones *I've* attacked, again and again,
precisely concerning this, trying to *destroy* these attempts of
theirs *and* also your support of them.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"We ourselves have our origin in this Marxist-Leninist movement
and have always played a particular role."
This was *once* true - some 15-30 years ago. Today it's a lie.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"The fits of rage by people as Rolf Martens who essentially are
in cahoots with the American rightist bourgeoisie stem from
nothing else."
Upside-down, upside-down, second time around, snakes.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"Rolf Martens essentially is an agent beneficial to the rightist
forces, similar to such people who for a long time "supported"
the People's Republic of China in order to attempt to encircle
it from the part of the US."
Upside-down, etc, now *third* time around, CIA-helping rattlers.
[RATTLER WRITHING:]
"In addition it has to be mentioned that Rolf Martens who was in
connection with the circles abroad around the PCP, for some time
simultaneously sought the connection to the obscure LaRouche-
party of the US, as if one could have normal relations with such
people, and we don't think this connection to have happened by
chance."
XX. SOMETHING NEW - AS TRIED BY PURPORTED "NON-GREENS",
AT ANY RATE: OF COURSE "THE PARTY OF LYNDON LAROUCHE,
USA"
Ah - something new! At least as coming from you! Though not as
coming from openly-appearing Trotskyites and other people, above
all such as are making propaganda for the ultra-reactionary
"green" tendency in society, for the (main) imperialists'
"green" warfare against the peoples of the world!
"The LaRouche-party"!
Precisely this I've already been - quite wrongly - accused of
"standing in connection with", also by several people precisely
in those (purported) "PCP-surroundings" with which you're pre-
tending to have "nothing to to" and which you even are trying to
"shove down *my* throat". This was the very first thing that
"Quispe" ("MPP"-USA) tried against me, for instance. And later
the matter came up in a discussion with a representative of the
"Action Socialiste" in Canada, for which it's typical that it's
extremely "pro-PCP" (in words), in the first place, and extreme-
ly "green" (anti-industrial), in the second.
How are things in reality, concerning for instance this openly-
bourgeois party, on the one hand, and me, an adherent of prole-
tarian revolution, on the other?
I've never "sought any connection to" the LaRouche party, in the
first place, nor to any other bourgeois such. Marxists always
advocate the *self-dependent* organizing of proletarian forces.
As far as possible united fronts, punctual alliances on various
matters, are concerned, the question of course is a different
one. Your "group", for instance - as bourgeois as can be, and
among the most extremely rightist ones too - recently has said
it wanted to join the movement to support the DR Congo. Thus,
theoretically at least, there arises the question for Marxists
of whether perhaps to unite with you on this.
And I said and wrote: Why not try to "turn you snakes' venom as
far as can be done into a beneficial serum?" - while at the same
time warning people concerning you.
At the latter, you were very angry. Such warnings "don't belong
in a solidarity movement", you said. But they do, of course.
And something similar it is with the LaRouche party. Although
bourgeois, it does speak out very sharply against the ultra-re-
actionary "green" tendency in society, that tendency which you -
still, and on some few occasions - are saying you oppose too,
snakes, but which your real masters, the main forces of US impe-
rialism, are the biggest protagonists of.
The LaRouche party no doubt is a kind of snake too, a python or
something, but as far as I can judge not quite as nasty and
poisonous as your rattlesnake group. One "cannot" have "normal
relations with" "such people"? Yes, on a united-front basis,
this at least is theoretically possible. You, with your so very
close and very "normal" relations with the *agents* Chris Bur-
ford and Vladimir Bilenkin, for instance, from June 1998 on, are
much more "difficult" for Marxists to have any "relations" with
at all.
[Continued in part 7/7]