December 9, 2013
To Haaretz Senior Editor
Haaretz violates the rules of good journalism again
Recently Haaretz and Gideon Levy were reprimanded by the Israel Press
Council for violating the ethics code that mandates fact-checking,
objectivity and loyalty to the truth and that bars any mention of a
person's country of origin, ethnicity or social class if it isn't
relevant to the subject under discussion. It also said Haaretz's editors
had not made sure the facts were checked and that they were not careful
enough about what the paper published
Your December 8 article under the sub-title "Shimon Peres and
Benjamin Netanyahu have no right to eulogize Nelson Mandela"
similarly contravenes the basics of good journalism. For example while
you correctly quote Nelson Mandela as having said "We know too
well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the
Palestinians" you omitted his very important qualification
acknowledging Israel's legitimate security concerns: "I cannot
conceive of Israel withdrawing if Arab states do not recognize Israel
within secure borders."
Careless with facts, Levy erroneously slams Shimon Peres for allegedly
having hosted South Africa's prime ministers and says this disqualifies
him from admiring Mandela. As far I can recall only two apartheid prime
ministers visited Israel and Peres hosted neither. Ben Gurion was
PM when D.F. Malan visited in 1953 and Rabin was PM when B.J. Vorster
visited in 1976. Malan also visited Britain, Switzerland, Belgium and
Netherlands and Vorster was welcomed in Portugal, Spain, France, W.
Germany Paraguay, Uruguay and Switzerland. P.W. Botha was welcomed in
Britain as late as 1984. Between 1980 and 1988 he visited most European
countries including the Vatican.
Singling out Israel is not only malevolent, it is absurd. Levy's argument
implies that none of the leaders of countries that hosted South African
prime ministers in the days of apartheid are entitled to admire
Mandela.
Levy FALSELY alleges that Israel was "virtually the only country
that collaborated with that evil regime". It is disgraceful
that he recklessly propagates this damaging canard in violation of clause
5 of the Israel Press rules that states unambiguously "Prior to the
publication of any item, the newspaper and the journalist shall check the
accuracy thereof with the most reliable source and with the caution
appropriate to the circumstances of the case".
The fact is that dozens of countries traded and collaborated with the
apartheid regime. In 1986, while apartheid was suffering worldwide
opprobrium, South Africa's main trading partners were, USA $3.4
billion, Japan $2.9 billion, Germany $2.8 billion, and
U.K. $2.6 billion. By comparison, Israel's puny $0.2 billion total
trade with South Africa amounted to less than 1% of South Africa's total
trade. In addition the apartheid regime was propped up by Arab oil and
financing by major European banks
Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan opposed sanctions against South
Africa in the 1980's. Thatcher visited SA and was hosted by Botha who
said he was highly impressed by her. The US considered the ANC a
terrorist group and Mandela's name remained on the U.S. terrorism watch
list Until 2008.
In the circumstances and in view of the harmful political implications,
it is highly irresponsible to propagate the canard (i.e. the false
deliberately misleading story) that Israel was the only country that
collaborated with South Africa and a retraction is called for.
Maurice Ostroff