I much prefer (1). A split between sectional/inline will be much more
consistent with existing options, and I would rather keep the WW "stuff" within
exercises.
Possible to add this in upcoming clean-up, or else it will be part of a later
refactor of "exercises" and "exercise".
Can you make an issue?
On 07/02/2017 03:31 PM, Alex Jordan wrote:
> I have an issue with ORCCA that necessitates a feature request. However I'm not
> sure which of two feature requests it should be.
>
> Currently, a webwork can only be put in an exercise. And there are two kinds of
> exercise: inline and sectional. In ORCCA, we use inline webwork exercises more
> as interactive examples. The reader should read them, try them, and read their
> solutions too.
>
> So the dilemma is that we want inline exercise solutions to be visible, but not
> sectional exercise solutions. I am not aware that there is a flag for this.
>
> I'm either requesting
>
> 1. that solutions can be set to show or not show for inline exercises
> separately from sectional exercises; or
> 2. that we allow webwork to be put in examples, not just exercises.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MathBook XML Support" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> to
mathbook-xml-sup...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
mathbook-xml-sup...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.