Friends,
I have got the following formulae for calculating the heat input for SMAW and other welding processes’. Pl confirm which one is correct. As far as I am concerned, I am following the FIRST SET for all the process.
First Set:
Second Set:
Third set:
Regards,
Vasanth
*** WORLEYPARSONS GROUP NOTICE *** "This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email and delete the email and any attachments. Any personal views or opinions expressed by the writer may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any company in the WorleyParsons Group of Companies."
Friends
i)For SMAW process , The Formula given is a thumb rule but
ii)We generally major on bead length basis ,As we have observed in SMAW ,it is difficult to control the consistent Current and Voltage
i.e.
Say For 4Dia x 450 length of electrode
We measure the weld bead length after burning say 400mm length of electrode and the same is recorded in PQR/ e.g. 350mm bead length for burning of 400mm electrodes . This way we control the heat input of weld to get good impact property
We can mention the bead length against individual size electrodes in WPS
Regards
Hegde p.B.
| Just run a PQR, get mech tests done; if all comes Ok, try to stick to the lower end of the range as far as possible. Sec IX allows +15% deviation from the PQR values. Also, PB's guidelines can be followed. --- On Mon, 8/6/09, PB HEGDE <hegd...@isgec.com> wrote: |
|
|
Hegde Saab,
I agree with you. However, as per Sec IX, the heat input can be calculated in either bead length or formula basis. If formula basis, then which one is applicable apart from bead length. Pl give me your input.
Regards,
Vasanth
From:
material...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:material...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of PB HEGDE
Sent: 08 June 2009 08:28
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:2347] RE: 2345] Heat
Input formula
Friends
lang=EN-US>
Dear Vasanth
For following formula as per ASME code
Considering fluctuation in Current ,Volt and speed
You consider (while qualifying PQR)—i) Max Current and volt you get on Tong tester ii) Min welding speed /min
in 3 G position This will give you Heat input by Formula with practical consideration
Moreover The fluctuation depends upon Welders skill, machine type ,length of the cable etc.
ii) Heat input by bead length, you consider the method as explained earlier
This wi
----- Original Message -----From: handry gmailSent: Monday, June 08, 2009 2:01 PMSubject: Fw: [MW:2345] Heat Input formula
Hi!
As per QW 409.1 There is no tolerance for increase in heat input but you can reduce heat input.. Increase in heat input calls for requalification of PQR
Regards
Hegde
From: material...@googlegroups.com [mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Huub de Goey
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 2:19 PM
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Hi!
As per QW 409.1 There is no tolerance for increase in heat input but you can reduce heat input.. Increase in heat input calls for requalification of PQR
Regards
Hegde
From: material...@googlegroups.com [mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Huub de Goey
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 2:19 PM
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:2351] Re: Heat Input formula
Hi
Yes in that case there is no restriction on Heat input and therefore you can give any tolerance
Hegde
Pl find attched the heat in put clculation table for general application
Regards
SUNEEL GORE |
|
|