I had a similar thought & I agree to you some extent, however, the other thing which came in to my mind is the the temperature range at which the head is getting normalized.
I believe that normalizing of heads can't exactly simulate the conditions through which the plates had undergone i.e temp. band withing which the plates were normalized. Also the cooiling conditions in the MTC only indicates in air. Moreover the holding time may also play a vital role. I believe,This may lead to change in the properties to some extent. (Metallurgist expertise in this regard would be beneficial for the group)
Code is very clear that simulation is to be done for heat treatment above the lower transformation temperature & PWHT. Hence, i believe there is no need to look into interpretation.
Generally, normalizing is to done minimum 100 deg.cent above the upper critical tempearature based on I-C diagram wherin the material goes into austenitic stage. Should there be an upper limit to the normalizing temperature??
I would like to add one more query in this regard, for which there could be a written interpretaion. If yes, then please share :
"UCS85(C): As per, UCS 85 (c), material used in the vessel shall be represented by test specimens which have been subjected to the same heat treatments above the lower transformation temperature and post weld heat treament..."
Query: Same heat treatments : Is there any restriction/limitation on temp.band??
If no, does it effect the mechanical properties??
Ajay