Backing by gas/Back purging is not essential for P.No 8 - Austentic stainless steel? - ASME Sec 9

2,971 views
Skip to first unread message

Srinivas Engr

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 1:32:48 AM2/10/11
to Materials & Welding
Dear All,

As per QW 256, GTAW process,
QW 408 Gas, There is no essential variable for gas Backing for P.No.
-8. Austentic Stainless Steel. A312 & others.
So we can qualify WPS without gas backing/Bsckpurging.
Am i right or not?
Pl clear me

Regards
Srinivas

Zakaria ghrab

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 2:34:39 AM2/10/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sir,

As i know & as per QW 256 & QW408.9 ,  only deletion and chnage in backing gas composition is essentiel variable, so we can qualify WPS without backing but we will have sure problem in penetration. The best is to do one PQR with backing gas and use it to qualify all your WPS's in production.


Regards.

  

2011/2/10 Srinivas Engr <srinivas...@gmail.com>

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.



--
GHRAB Zakaria

Engineer Mech

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 3:02:04 AM2/10/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,
 
BY Asme sec 9, QW 408.9 & .10, does n't applies to P No.8, Austentis SS
So.. he may be right. I think we can.
 
 
Regards

Prakash Hegde

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 3:08:49 AM2/10/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Hi!
From qualty point of view, the gas backing /purging for groove welding of SS  is essential . Failure to backing will cause Oxidation of weld which is not acceptable
 
Regards
 
Hegde P.B.


From: Zakaria ghrab <zakari...@gmail.com>
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, 10 February, 2011 1:04:39 PM
Subject: Re: [MW:9799] Backing by gas/Back purging is not essential for P.No 8 - Austentic stainless steel? - ASME Sec 9

Vinod Kataria

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 2:31:23 AM2/10/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
No for Austenitic Steel it is must to do back purging so that oxygen does
not come in contact with molten Chromium as SS is having Cr and during
welding if it is coming in contact with oxygen it will become chromium oxide
and the same is very brittle and lead to weld crack.

With kind regards,
Vinod Kumar Kataria
GM - Operations
Bliss Anand Private Limited,
92B/93B Sector 5
IMT Manesar,Gurgaon,
National Capital Region Delhi.
India .
Phone : +91-124-4366000 (9 Lines)
Mobile Phone : +91-9560199004
Fax : +91-124-2290884

-----Original Message-----
From: material...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Srinivas Engr
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: Materials & Welding
Subject: [MW:9798] Backing by gas/Back purging is not essential for P.No 8 -
Austentic stainless steel? - ASME Sec 9

Dear All,

Regards
Srinivas

--

james gerald

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 3:33:28 AM2/10/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Srinivas,

AS per ASME Sec.IX, Backing Gas is not an essential variable for P.No.8 materials but the applicable Client specification will cover this aspect and make it mandatory to use Backing Gas for stainless steel.

Basically you cannot weld materials greater than 5% Chromium and Non ferrous metals without Backing Gas. The entire weld will be Blackish with lot of porosities and it will not pass Radiography testing.

Hence it is always good engineering practice to use Backing Gas for single sided welds of P.No:8 stainless steels.


J.GERALD JAYAKUMAR 00919344954677  


--- On Thu, 2/10/11, Srinivas Engr <srinivas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Srinivas Engr <srinivas...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [MW:9798] Backing by gas/Back purging is not essential for P.No 8 - Austentic stainless steel? - ASME Sec 9

Eduardo Calva

unread,
Feb 10, 2011, 9:04:45 PM2/10/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dears, could you please tell me what this statement of API RP-2201 mean?

 

6.8 WELDING AND HOT TAP CONNECTION DESIGN

Welding or hot tapping should not be permitted closer than

18 in. (46 cm) to a flange or threaded connection, or approxi-

Mately 3 in. (8 cm) to a welded seam (including a longitudi-

nal seam of welded piping) unless determined by an

engineering review to be acceptable.

 

 

Eduardo Calva


AGUSTIN JIMENEZ

unread,
Feb 11, 2011, 7:34:37 AM2/11/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Hi.
If you instaling a split tee with welding this should not be permitted closer than

18 in. (46 cm) to a flange or threaded connection, or approxi-

Mately 3 in. (8 cm) to a welded seam (including a longitudi-

nal seam of welded piping)

 
Agustin




De: Eduardo Calva <eduard...@hotmail.com>
Para: material...@googlegroups.com
Enviado: jue, febrero 10, 2011 9:34:45 PM
Asunto: [MW:9805] Hot-tap hole
SHORTSTOPP® Welding Fittings - tdw.pdf
TDW1.pdf

Pedro Alvarez

unread,
Feb 12, 2011, 4:26:46 AM2/12/11
to Materials & Welding
Dear Mr. Calva

The statement means that you are not allowed to weld or to hot tap
(drill a hole in the pipe under pressure conditions) unless these
operations are performed at distances farther than specified values
from flanges, threaded connectiosn of welds.

A Hot Tap is defined as using a drilling machine to cut a hole into an
in-service, under-pressure piping system. This is done without service
interruption or product leakage.

Regards.

Pedro Alvarez
Materials Science PhD.
LORTEK-Joining Research Center
Ordizia-Spain
palv...@lortek.es

Eduardo Calva

unread,
Feb 15, 2011, 1:24:43 PM2/15/11
to material...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Pedro.
 
Could someone please tell me the origin of that restriction?
 
Is it not acceptable making the drill on a longitudinal seam on the carrier pipe?


Eduardo Calva



 
> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 01:26:46 -0800
> Subject: [MW:9837] Re: Hot-tap hole
> From: palvar...@gmail.com
> To: material...@googlegroups.com

DWGCWICWENDE

unread,
Dec 7, 2017, 11:37:03 PM12/7/17
to Materials & Welding
ASME IX Paragraph QW-408.9 is called out on table QW-256 under gas QW-408. The definitive answer is there, all the exotics in that paragraph Backing Gas is essential for them only. All other groups that are not there Backing gas is not a Essential Variable for WPSs. A Welder Performance Qualification done using Backing Gas or not using Backing Gas it is Essential on those material groups not called out in QW-408.9. Is using Argon backing gas the best welding practice for welding P8 materials, absolutely. I would not remove backing gas from any process per a customers request as it is a quality and application issue. People don't choose stainless steel by spinning the wheel of material to use on this job as it is typically applied because of applications or environment that have corrosive potential and that property is diminished if Backing Gas is not used.   
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages