PREN Value For Duplex SS
Prakas...@akersolutions.com
Prakash Verma
METALLURGIST-Drilling Riser Systems
QS ENGG.
Aker Solutions Supply chain hub-India
AkerSolutions
Tel.+91-20-66 28 8538
Email. prakas...@akersolutions.com
This e-mail and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and any attachments permanently from your system.
Raghuram Bathula
Pitting resistance equivalent numbers (PREN) are a theoretical way of comparing the pitting corrosion resistance of various types of stainless steels, based on their chemical compositions.
The PREN (or PRE) numbers are useful for ranking and comparing the different grades, but cannot be used to predict whether a particular grade will be suitable for a given application, where pitting corrosion may be a hazard.
Actual or specified range compositions can be used and usually involve chromium, molybdenum and nitrogen in the calculations.
Affect of alloying elements on pitting resistance
These are 'linear' formulas, where the molybdenum and nitrogen levels are 'weighted' to take account of their strong influence on pitting corrosion resistance.
They typically take the form
PREN = Cr + m Mo + n N
where 'm' and 'n' are the factors for molybdenum and nitrogen.
The most commonly used version of the formula is
PREN = Cr + 3.3Mo + 16N
Some formulas weight nitrogen more, with factors of 27 or 30, but as the actual nitrogen levels are quite modest in most stainless steels, this does not have a dramatic effect on ranking. Tungsten is also included in the molybdenum-rating factor to acknowledge its affect on pitting resistance in the tungsten bearing super-duplex types (1.4501). A modified formula is then used:
PREN = Cr + 3.3(Mo +0.5W) + 16N
Calculated pitting resistance numbers
Nitrogen ranges are not specified in standards such as BS EN 10088-1 for all but specific grades, such as 1.4311 (304LN), 1.4406 (316LN) austenitics. In contrast all the duplex grades have specified nitrogen ranges. It can then be misleading to use just specified ranges as the residual nitrogen in commercially produced austenitics will benefit the pitting resistance.
The table below shows a range of calculated PREN values for comparison. A full theoretical range is shown, using a combination of the lowest and highest specified values for a selection of ferritic, austenitic and duplex grades.
The values are rounded for convenience of display.
The PREN values for commercially available grades will of course lie somewhere between these minimum and maximum values and so commercially available steels in grades 1.4410 and 1.4501 are likely to have actual PREN values over 40.
Grades with a PREN of 40 or more are known as 'super' austenitics or 'super' duplex types, depending to which basic family they belong.
PREN = Cr + 3.3Mo + 16N
Tungsten (W) is known to have an effect on the pitting resistance and for some grades a modified formula is used:
PREN = Cr + 3.3(Mo +0.5W) + 16N
| Grade | Type | Cr | Mo | N | PREN |
| Ferritics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4003 | Nirosta 4003 /K03 | 10.5-12.5 | NS | 0.030 max | 10.5-13.0 |
| 1.4016 | 430 | 16.0-18.0 | NS | NS | 16.0 |
| 1.4113 | 434 | 16.0-18.0 | 0.9-1.4 | NS | 19.0-22.6 |
| 1.4509 | 441 | 17.5-18.5 | NS | NS | 17.5-18.5 |
| 1.4521 | 444 | 17.0-20.0 | 1.8-2.5 | 0.030max | 23.0-28.7 |
| Austenitics | |||||
| 1.4301 | 304 | 17.0-19.5 | NS | 0.11max | 17.0-20.8 |
| 1.4311 | 304LN | 17.0-19.5 | NS | 0.12-0.22 | 18.9-23.0 |
| 1.4401/4 | 316/316L | 16.5-18.5 | 2.0-2.5 | 0.11max | 23.1-28.5 |
| 1.4435 | 316L (2.5% min Mo) | 17.0-19.0 | 2.5-3.0 | 0.11max | 25.3-30.7 |
| 1.4406 | 316LN | 16.5-18.5 | 2.0-2.5 | 0.12-0.22 | 25.0-30.3 |
| 1.4539 | 904L | 19.0-21.0 | 4.0-5.0 | 0.15max | 32.2-39.9 |
| 1.4563 | Sanicro 28 | 24.0-26.0 | 3.0-4.0 | 0.11max | 35.9-43.0 |
| 1.4547 | 254SMO | 19.5-20.5 | 6.0-7.0 | 0.18-0.25 | 42.2-47.6 |
| 1.4529 | 1925hMo | 19.0-21.0 | 6.0-7.0 | 0.15-0.25 | 41.2-48.1 |
| 1.4565 | 4565S | 24.0-26.0 | 4.0-5.0 | 0.30-0.60 | 42.0-52.1 |
| Duplex | |||||
| 1.40621 | 2202 | 22.0 | 0.4 | 0.20 | 26.5 |
| 1.4162 | 2101LDX | 21.0-22.0 | 0.1-0.8 | 0.20-0.25 | 24.5-28.6 |
| 1.4362 | SAF 2304 | 22.0-24.0 | 0.1-0.6 | 0.05-0.20 | 23.1-29.2 |
| 1.4462 | SAF 2205 | 21.0-23.0 | 2.5-3.5 | 0.10-0.22 | 30.8-38.1 |
| 1.4410 | SAF 2507 | 24.0-26.0 | 3.0-4.0 | 0.24-0.35 | 37.7-46.5 |
| 1.45012 | Zeron 100 | 24.0-26.0 | 3.0-4.0 | 0.20-0.30 | 37.9-45.7 |
| 1.4507 | Ferrinox 255 | 24.0-26.0 | 3.0-4.0 | 0.20-0.30 | 37.1-44.0 |
The nearest AISI grade is shown, where appropriate, otherwise a typical trade name used by some of manufacturers is shown.
NS - Not specified
1 Typical composition only available
2 Modified formula including effect of tungsten(W) 0.5-1.0%
| Nirosta 4003 | Thyssen Krupp Stainless Limited |
| K03 | ArcelorMittal Stainless UK Ltd |
| 2101LDX | Outokumpu Ltd |
| 904L | Outokumpu Ltd |
| 254SMO 4565S | Outokumpu Ltd |
| SAF 2304, SAF 2205, SAF 2507, Sanicro 28 | Sandvik Steel UK |
| Zeron 100 | Rolled Alloys |
Pieper QSI
Dear Mr. Verma,
You need to calculate your PREN value in order to prove that the materials chemical composition is balanced in such way that the required resistance against pitting corrosion can be guaranteed. For Duplex Stainless Steel most specification require PREN >33 for Super Duplex PREN >40 but client can ask for other values.
Met vriendelijke groeten / Best Regards
Herman Pieper
Pieper Quality Support & Inspection
Phone: +31 (0)521 380083
Fax: +31 (0)84 7539225
Cell: +31 (0)6 51691215
--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.