Dear Aamir,
A 316L filler would yield a deposit that, when mixed with carbon steel, would be similar to a 410 a Martensitic stainless deposit. This would be a weld deposit that may be too brittle for the application.
The recommended filler, in this case, would be 309L Mo (not 309L) since, when mixed with carbon steel, it yields a deposit similar
to a 316L (with Cr, Ni & Mo alloys) deposit. Carbon is close to chromium and under high heat for a long time, they combine for carbides.
As a result, there is less free chromium to form the corrosion-resistant film, and rust can appear. Further, the affected metal becomes brittle and prone to cracking. This way, you keep the superior resistance of the stainless steel part and prevent hot-cracking defects.
To get a lower heat input (forming an undesirable bluish colour weld and HAZ),
Why cannot weld SS 316L on CS directly? Why do we need to use the SS 309 welding rod on CS to provide a base to weld SS 316L?
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CABXHva65M9GtbE6y2Li-YBHMGyowfeTFyzmKrt%2BGN%2BBaKL3XeA%40mail.gmail.com.
Why cannot weld SS 316L on CS directly? Why do we need to use the SS 309 welding rod on CS to provide a base to weld SS 316L?
--
Why cannot weld SS 316L on CS directly? Why do we need to use the SS 309 welding rod on CS to provide a base to weld SS 316L?
--