SS304/304L Tubes to CS Tubesheet Mock Weld -Cracks found

55 views
Skip to first unread message

PARAI Reaction Channel

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 9:48:25 AMApr 15
to materials-welding@googlegroups com
Dear Sirs,

We have made 2 MockUp PQRs as per ASME Sec IX QW-193.

The Tube sizes are 19.05OD x2.11T and 15.88OD x2.11T, the
tubesheet plate is SA-516-70, 50T.

Amps used Max 145, Volts Max 13, welded with GTAW AWS Class ER309 with 1.6mm Filler , 2 passes.

We found minor cracks on the weld root and some on the surface too, but not for all the 10 tubes welded, but randomly found these cracks

When we did PT after welding on the surface, no cracks were found. But found after Macro etching at the test lab.

Can I switch the filler to ER309LMo for this MockUp weld ?

Are these cracks called Hot cracks ?

Please give me some advice.

With best regards,
Saravanan Sornam,
Ansan city,
S.Korea.


patni engineers

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 10:37:12 AMApr 15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Check ER 347

Regards,

Chandrakant
B.E Mech.
ASNT Level II RT/UT/PT/MPT/CSWIP

GST -27AMOPP5962A1ZS
Patni Engineers. Mumbai. India
PED/2014/68/EU
welding shop AD2000/DIN EN ISO 3834
IBR Approved 

Factory Addreess- Pl Call 

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CALV1rkLag0%3D-RPjKQhRB21ODF3eNenk1Ey71-xTpp5LFMvTj5w%40mail.gmail.com.

Vanchinath S.A.

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 11:06:57 PMApr 15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Weld root with 80-90 amps. 
Vanchi

PARAI Reaction Channel

unread,
Apr 16, 2026, 1:32:13 AMApr 16
to materials-welding@googlegroups com
Dear Sir, 

Thank you for your advice for root welding parameters. 

Can i use ER309LMO  instead of ER309 ?

Please confirm. 

Thanks and regards, 
Saravanan Sornam, 
ANSAN,
S.KOREA 


Ahmed Osman

unread,
Apr 16, 2026, 5:22:00 AMApr 16
to materials-welding@googlegroups com
sure, 309LMO will be helpful as low carbon and MO are increasing delta ferrite for avoiding hot cracks
also reduce heat input for controlling dilution from CS sheet

Best Regards ,
Ahmed Osman



PARAI Reaction Channel

unread,
May 1, 2026, 7:55:25 AM (4 days ago) May 1
to materials-welding@googlegroups com
Dear Sirs, 

As per my below mail history and your recommendation for low Amps to avoid high heat input, 
After performing the new MOCKUPs for 15.85, & 19.05 OD SS304L tubes to CS SA-516-70N tubesheet of 50mm with GTAW ER309LMO 1.6 Dia only of 3 passes for 19.05 ID tube, 82 A for 1st pass, 95A for 2nd, 100A for 3rd pass. Only 2 passes given for 15.85 OD tube.

We got incomplete penetration aa per the attached macro photo., almost for all the tube welds for both sized tube welds.

Please see the groove design for your reference. 

Also, please give me suggestions to make sound complete penetration on root pass and to avoid cracks too.

Thanks and regards, 
Saravanan Sornam, 
Ansan city,
S.Korea 




255266.jpg
255276.jpg

Hrushikesh Sangamnerkar

unread,
May 1, 2026, 9:35:26 AM (4 days ago) May 1
to Materials & Welding
Hi..

Kindly do the following:
1. Root pass - 1.2mm dia.wire (Autogenous welding with min.filler wire)
2. 1st pass + 2nd pass - 1.6mm dia.

If accessibility is an issue go with 'J type groove design" with radius of 2mm.

Hope this will help and give you sound welds without cracks.

Regards,

Hrushikesh H Sangamnerkar
09724738118

Marco Nunes

unread,
May 1, 2026, 9:35:35 AM (4 days ago) May 1
to material...@googlegroups.com

What the Macro Suggests

From the image:

  • Fusion is occurring on the upper groove walls.
  • Root area shows an unfused triangular gap / cold lap zone.
  • Weld metal is flowing around the joint rather than penetrating fully to the root.
  • This is typical when the arc cannot adequately reach the root face or root land.

Likely Causes

1. Amperage Too Low for Root Pass

82 A for first pass on a restrained joint with 50 mm thick tubesheet may be too low, especially if heat is rapidly absorbed by the heavy SA-516 tubesheet.

The tubesheet acts as a heat sink, pulling heat away from the root.

2. Groove Design / Root Land Too Heavy

If the groove has:

  • narrow included angle
  • excessive land/root face
  • insufficient tube projection or mismatch

then penetration becomes difficult at lower amps.

3. Arc Position / Torch Angle

If arc is focused too much on filler or upper bevel edges rather than root corner, fusion at the bottom will be poor.

4. Travel Speed Too Fast

If moving too quickly on root pass, puddle bridges the opening before full fusion occurs.


Recommendations to Achieve Sound Root Penetration

A. Increase Root Pass Current Slightly

Try:

For 19.05 mm tube:

  • Root pass: 90–100 A
  • Hot pass: 100–110 A
  • Cap: 105–115 A

For 15.85 mm tube:

  • Root pass: 80–90 A

(Exact depends on wall thickness)

Use pulse GTAW if possible.


B. Modify Groove Design (Very Important)

Need better root accessibility:

Suggested:

  • Increase included angle to 37.5° to 45°
  • Reduce root face to 0.5 mm max
  • Maintain small root gap if code allows
  • Ensure tube stickout/projection consistent

Current geometry may be choking penetration.


C. Use Arc Focus Technique

For root pass:

  • Keep tight arc length
  • Direct arc into root corner
  • Slight pause at sidewalls
  • Minimal filler addition initially until keyhole/fusion established

D. Preheat Tubesheet Slightly

For SA-516 thick section:

  • 80–120°C local preheat

This reduces heat sink effect and improves fusion without excessive amperage.


E. Back Purge / Internal Shielding

For SS304L tube root integrity, ensure argon purge inside tube.

Poor shielding can also contribute to cracking/oxidation.


To Avoid Cracks Simultaneously

Since you also had cracking concerns earlier:

Use:

  • ER309LMo is correct choice
  • Control interpass <150°C
  • Avoid excessive restraint if possible
  • Do not overweld
  • Slightly higher heat with fewer passes is often better than cold multilayer welds

Cold welds can crack too.


My Best Practical Recommendation

Trial Procedure:

19.05 tube:

  • Preheat tubesheet to 100°C
  • Root pass 95 A DCEN
  • 1.6 mm tungsten
  • Tight arc
  • Slow travel
  • 3 passes total

If still incomplete:

  • Slightly open groove angle.

Important Observation

You moved from cracking due to too much restraint/heat imbalance to lack of fusion due to overcorrection (too cold).

Now you need the balanced middle zone.


Vishwas Keskar

unread,
May 1, 2026, 10:46:50 PM (3 days ago) May 1
to material...@googlegroups.com
Best way is to make the groove with radius instead of bevel degree.
The Welder will get room and dwell time to manoeuver the arc easily for full fusion at root junction of tube / tube plate .

Regards

  Vishwas
IWE
9823472273
India 


Ashishranjan - Domech Fabricators Pvt.Ltd.

unread,
May 4, 2026, 5:48:44 AM (yesterday) May 4
to material...@googlegroups.com

Dear PRC,

What you’re seeing is a fairly classic situation with tube-to-tubesheet mockups so before changing filler, it’s worth understanding the mechanism.

1) Are these hot cracks?

Yes—what you’re describing strongly points to solidification cracking (hot cracking).

Why:

  • They appear at the root and sometimes surface
  • Not detected by PT, but show up after macro etch → typical of tight, interdendritic cracks
  • Occur randomly, not in every weld
  • You’re using austenitic filler (ER309) on a dissimilar joint (likely carbon steel tubesheet + possibly SS tubes)

These are textbook indicators of hot cracking during solidification.

2) Likely causes in your case

Several contributing factors are probably overlapping:

a) Dilution from SA-516 Gr.70 (high carbon steel)

  • Excess dilution into ER309 reduces ferrite in the weld metal
  • Low ferrite (FN < ~3–5) → high hot cracking susceptibility

b) Fully austenitic weld metal

  • If your weld metal solidifies as fully austenitic, it’s very crack-prone

c) Heat input / bead profile

  • Your parameters (~145 A, 13 V, 2 passes, 1.6 mm wire) can produce:
    • Narrow beads
    • High restraint at root
    • Segregation → cracking

d) Joint restraint

  • Tube-to-tubesheet welds are highly restrained, which promotes hot cracking

e) Possible contamination

  • Sulfur, phosphorus, or even minor surface contamination can aggravate cracking

3) Can you switch to ER309LMo?

Yes—you can, and in many cases it helps, but it’s not a guaranteed fix by itself.

Why ER309LMo may help:

  • Mo improves resistance to solidification cracking
  • Slightly better tolerance to dilution
  • Often results in a more crack-resistant weld metal structure

However:

  • The key factor is ferrite content, not just Mo
  • If dilution is still high, even ER309LMo can crack

4) More effective corrective actions (important)

Instead of only changing filler, address the root causes:

✔ Control ferrite number (very important)

  • Target FN 5–10 minimum
  • If possible, check using FN meter or calculate via WRC-92 diagram

✔ Reduce dilution from tubesheet

  • Use lower heat input at root
  • Use stringer beads, avoid wide weaving
  • Slightly reduce amperage if penetration is excessive

✔ Consider buttering approach (best practice in critical jobs)

  • Butter tubesheet hole with SS (309/309LMo)
  • Then weld tube → reduces dilution dramatically

✔ Root pass control

  • Ensure:
    • Proper fit-up (no excessive gap)
    • Smooth root profile (avoid concavity)
    • Avoid overheating small root area

✔ Interpass temperature

  • Keep controlled (typically <150°C for this type)

✔ Cleanliness

  • Ensure:
    • No oil, moisture, or oxide
    • Proper pickling/cleaning if needed

5) Why PT didn’t detect cracks

This is normal:

  • Hot cracks are often:
    • Very tight
    • Subsurface or micro-cracks
  • PT only detects open-to-surface discontinuities

Macro etching exposes them by revealing grain boundary separation.

6) Practical recommendation

Do this in order:

  1. Switch to ER309LMo ✔ (good step)
  2. Reduce heat input at root
  3. Ensure ferrite presence (FN ≥ 5)
  4. If still failing →
    👉 adopt buttering technique (most reliable fix)

7) Bottom line

  • Yes, these are hot cracks (solidification cracks)
  • Yes, ER309LMo is a better choice, but not a standalone solution
  • The real fix is controlling dilution + ensuring ferrite in weld metal

Regards,

Ashish Ranjan

+91 9555864374

Go green logo

Save a tree...Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hardcopy.



"Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.

Virus Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."


Caution: The e-mail below is from an external source. Please do not open attachments or click links unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages