Dear All,
Design Code – ASME B31.3
Welding Code – ASME BPV SECTION IX
I have a PQR for the following material classification as per ASME BPV SEC IX
Material – P1 Group No. 1 to P1 Group No. 2
Weld Metal Impact Tested – Yes
My query is that,
1. Is there any problem for welding P1 Group No.1 to P1 Group No.1 & P1 Group No.2 to P1 Group No.2 based on above PQR?
2. Can I write separate WPS (with impact test) based on above PQR for,
Material – P1 Group No. 1 to P1 Group No. 1
Material – P2 Group No. 2 to P2 Group No. 2
My next query is that,
Is there any problem for showing all material range in a single WPS based on above PQR?
Hi,
.As per QW403.5 you can use.Please find below the answer for your quiries marked in RED.
Quiery No.1
|
1. Is there any problem for welding P1 Group No.1 to P1 Group No.1 & P1 Group No.2 to P1 Group No.2 based on above PQR? |
For ferrous materials in table QW/QB-422, a procedure
qualification shall be made for each P-Number Group Number
combination of base metals, even though procedure
qualification tests have been made for each of the two
base metals welded to itself. If, however, two or more
qualification records have the same essential and supplementary
essential variables, except that the base metals
are assigned to different Group Numbers within the same
P-Number, then the combination of base metals is also
qualified. In addition, when base metals of two different
P-Number Group Number combinations are qualified using
a single test coupon, that coupon qualifies the welding of
those two P-Number Group Numbers to themselves as well
as to each other using the variables qualified.
This variable does not apply when impact testing of the
Quiery No.2 |
2. Can I write separate WPS (with impact test) based on above PQR for, |
Material – P1 Group No. 1 to P1 Group No. 1 |
Material – P2 Group No. 2 to P2 Group No. 2 |
One WPS. on a single PQR (e.g., a 1G plate PQR may support WPSs
for the F, V, H, and O positions on plate or pipe within
all other essential variables). A single WPS may cover
several essential variable changes as long as a supporting
PQR exists for each essential and, when required, supplementary
essential variable [e.g., a single WPS may cover
a thickness range from (32 mm) if PQRs exist for both the 1⁄16 in. (1.5 mm) through14 3 ⁄16 in. (5 mm) and 3⁄16 in. (5 mm) through 11⁄4 in. (32 mm)thickness ranges].
Quiery No.3
|
Is there any problem for showing all material range in a single WPS based on above PQR? |
Ie, qualified range of materials- P1 Group No. 1 & P1 Group No. 2 in the same WPS. |
No problem.You can write all material range as much as possible within the P number specified in the WPS
Thanks & Regards,
(Karthik) Karthikeyan.S
QA/QC Manager
Getabec Energy Co.,Ltd.
379,Moo6,Soi8,Nikhomphatana,
Rayong-21180,
Thailand.
Phone: 0066 38 897035-8 (Off)
Fax: 0066 38 897034
Hand Phone: 0066 892512282 --- On Sun, 10/24/10, limesh M <lime...@gmail.com> wrote: |
|
|
|
1. Is there any problem for welding P1 Group No.1 to P1 Group No.1 & P1 Group No.2 to P1 Group No.2 based on above PQR?
You Cannot write WPS for the above combinations with existing PQR.
.2.Can I write separate WPS (with impact test) based on above PQR for,
Material – P1 Group No. 1 to P1 Group No. 1
Material – P2 Group No. 2 to P2 Group No. 2
--