Gents,
I am sure Mr Shokri is more correct.
In such cases, due to change in velocities and attenuation, the ultrasonic beam is likely to bend differently at the interface and a reflector may be at a different location and distance from what we would expect if we consider the material to be CS or SS.
In austenitic SS, also, many a time, we have to give proper consideration to these facts.
This effect become particularly more noticable if the beam path is more.
The angles quoted on probes are for MS of fine grains.
And this is DSS, far different in physical as well as metallurgical properties, and
micro-structure.
The ultrasonic wave velocity is dependent on the
attenuation which is is in return decided by the grain size - attenuation increases with
increase in grain size.
But at the same time, the ultrasonic velocity is also dependent both on ferrite austenite ratio, too . The
change in shear wave velocity and
elastic constants for DSS is more profound than in case of longitudinal wave.
Ultrasonic wave velocity values in case of DSS 2205 are compared with MS as given below,
In
case of DSS 2205 with UNS No. 31803
VL = 5347 m/s
Vs = 3100 m/s
And for Mild Steel,
VL = 5900 – 6100 m/s
Vs = 3250 m/s
So, if you consider the above, different calibration blocks made from the DSS at hand will be more advisable.
With Best Regards,
Shashank Vagal