FCAW Weaving Width

2,070 views
Skip to first unread message

Ram Chatt

unread,
Jun 18, 2013, 9:19:17 AM6/18/13
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Friends,
 
What is max.Allowable FCAW Welding Weaving Width .Any Standard Mention ?

Tarek Yehia

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 7:02:00 AM6/19/13
to material...@googlegroups.com
As far as i know, there is no limitations except ASME sec. VIII Div.1 & Div.2 (para. UCS-56 & 6.4.5.2) respectively and this is only for SMAW welding in case of repair areas as well only.


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ram Chatt <cha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Friends,
 
What is max.Allowable FCAW Welding Weaving Width .Any Standard Mention ?

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
Best regards,
 
Tarek Yehia

Dindo

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 8:48:45 AM6/19/13
to material...@googlegroups.com
It would be all dependent on your WPS, the wider the width the less is your travel speed the higher the heat input. This would be specially be important on impact tested jobs.
Message has been deleted

kannayeram gnanapandithan

unread,
Jun 21, 2013, 5:32:38 AM6/21/13
to materials-welding
general Engineering practice not more than 16 mm

c sridhar

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 1:45:08 PM6/22/13
to material...@googlegroups.com
There is no thumb rule for fixing  the weld width with GMAW  (or) FCAW  processes. it could be up to
15 to 20 times diameter of  the filler wire size being used by you.

Make sure that
you do not get any under cuts at the toes of the weld. If required, you can also adjust
torch and travel angles to avoid such problems.

In auto welding also, the oscilloscope could be adjusted  up to 20 times the wire size being used to get 
proper weld width, but maintain the dwell time on either side to avoid under-cuts in all the areas.

Sridhar
.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ram Chatt

unread,
Jun 23, 2013, 11:04:46 PM6/23/13
to material...@googlegroups.com, c sridhar
Thank you Friend,
 
 
in my problem we are welded so many joints for FCAW welding weaving width for single layer 20-25 mm (using multi 2 layer welding totaly caping width 45-48 mm ).But our client said this is not allowable .they make NCR.

 


c sridhar

unread,
Jun 24, 2013, 1:47:43 AM6/24/13
to material...@googlegroups.com
When your client says 20 mm  is not acceptable, then pl. find out what is their acceptable norms.

Calculate the total width of cap run and use 3 layers in place of  2 layer deposit.

This will help to increase the travel speed (due to reduced width of each layer) and also avoid NCRs.

Sridhar.



From: Ram Chatt <cha...@gmail.com>
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Cc: c sridhar <sridh...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, 24 June 2013 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [MW:18007] FCAW Weaving Width

Thank you Friend,
 
 
in my problem we are welded so many joints for FCAW welding weaving width for single layer 20-25 mm (using multi 2 layer welding totaly caping width 45-48 mm ).But our client said this is not allowable .they make NCR.

 


Tarek Yehia

unread,
Jun 24, 2013, 2:04:33 AM6/24/13
to material...@googlegroups.com, c sridhar

Dear friend,

Tell him his NCR is unacceptable or he shall furnish his reference.

Any NCR shall be refereing to project specs, code, standard or applicable procedure violations. He can't simply raise NCR!!!

If he provided, then please update us.

On 24 Jun 2013 07:11, "Ram Chatt" <cha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Friend,
 
 
in my problem we are welded so many joints for FCAW welding weaving width for single layer 20-25 mm (using multi 2 layer welding totaly caping width 45-48 mm ).But our client said this is not allowable .they make NCR.

 


Pieper QSI

unread,
Jun 24, 2013, 3:06:45 AM6/24/13
to material...@googlegroups.com

Of course it depends on specification(s) you have to follow during your project. But in general if your welding procedure is qualified by using string beads or with weaving in a specified width you should use this technology also for project welds especially when Charpy impact requirements need to be met. Increasing the width will increase the Heat Input (slow down the travel speed) as well and can reduce your CV impact values drastically.

In that case only heat input determines the acceptable weaving width which in case of AWS D1.1 never may become more than the Heat Input used during welding procedure qualification (see variable 9 - table 4.6 of AWS D1.1).

If nothing is specified in general 10 – 12 times the wire diameter is used as an acceptable range for maximum weaving width. In case of Ø 1.2 mm wire this means that max. allowed weaving width will be 12 – 15 mm.

 

Met vriendelijke groeten / Best Regards,

 

Herman Pieper

QA-QC Inspector / IWI-C Welding Inspector / IWT / Materials Expert

 

Logo nieuw klein

Job van der Havestraat 6

8384 DB, Wilhelminaoord

Cell: +31 6 51691215

--

To post to this group, send email to

image002.jpg

Pradeep kumar hormis

unread,
Jun 24, 2013, 3:21:11 AM6/24/13
to material...@googlegroups.com
     Exactly. Mr Sridhar is correct.  In Aramco according to their standards it is there about width of SMAW, GTAW( 3 to 5 times of diameter) processes . But if the Client specification or standards is not mentioned anything about Width , you can use  best industry practice. You had been used already Multipass caping. It is acceptable. If there is requirement of  hardness test, you can assure the hardness(mechanical properties) value to proove your client about the acceptance of your caping ( main intention of multi pass caping).
--
Thanks & Regards

PRADEEPKUMAR HORMIS
QC WELDING INSPECTOR
ARAMCO PROJECT(JEDDAH REFINERY)
Mob:+966 - 59 11 36 36 9



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages