Dear Suhairi
There is no mandatory clause to weld GTAW only, But for below 2 “ pipe welding ,you can not have back gouging due to accessibility constrain , Therefore GTAW is preferred, as we can get good full penetration and welder is comfortable. Moreover thickness is small where you can continue with single GTAW process to save the time. For better weld quality , use Pulse TIG or Up slope and down slope technique. Therefore for smaller dia pipe welding GTAW is preferred
Regards
Hegde P.B.
Dear Suhairi
There is no mandatory clause to weld GTAW only, But for below 2 “ pipe welding ,you can not have back gouging due to accessibility constrain , Therefore GTAW is preferred, as we can get good full penetration and welder is comfortable. Moreover thickness is small where you can continue with single GTAW process to save the time. For better weld quality , use Pulse TIG or Up slope and down slope technique. Therefore for smaller dia pipe welding GTAW is preferred
Regards
Hegde P.B.
From: material...@googlegroups.com [mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of tong tong
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 4:43 PM
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:2145] GTAW for pipe below 2"
Dear all members,
Hi Suhairi,
As the job gets more curved, manipulation for welding (heat input control and access) becomes rather tricky. Root pass is the most critical phase in all welding. GTAW caters to all these serious aspects, hence in case of small dia/small thicknesses, full GTAW is recommended. At the same time, in case of large thicknesses, if you use GTAW for root pass, a sound root can be ensured. On a sound root, good subsequent passes can be easily built up. All that you say, must however, be proven by running a PQR.
Rgds,
S Vagal
--- On Mon, 11/5/09, Sukamal Naskar <sukama...@gmail.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
|