Grade 91 in the as welded condition is susceptible to stress corrosion cracking – you decide.
John A. Henning
Welding & Materials
--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Regards
BABUR KHAN LASHARI
Welding Inspector
Mob: +966 (0) 56 2179280
Skype Id : babur.lashari
It is not a Code requirement to PWHT the fillet weld between P91 pad and CS support since the pad is not a pressure part.
However I would suggest that you do a PWHT to this weld, especially if you have a corrosive environment.
You could propose a monitoring plan for those welds, but it will be difficult to implement it since I suppose that this line will be insulated.
You may save a lot of trouble in the future if you do a PWHT for this fillet weld.
From: sumod s <sumod.sa...@gmail.com>
To: materials-welding <material...@googlegroups.com>
Date: 15/01/2014 18:47
Subject: [MW:19867] PWHT on P91 support (Pad +Shoe)
--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.[attachment "P91- PAD + SHOE.docx" deleted by George H Dilintas/GRC/VERITAS]
This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com
--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Dear,
Before saying PWHT required or not we need to know the thickness of the paf and the size of the weld?
If heat transfer to P91 is less through the CS pad then no stress creation will take plase in the P91 in this case no PWHT required but as said above this will depend on CS pad thickness.
Regards