--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
January 27, 2011
Hello there!
This material is very strong one. I think the welding consumable suppliers can best answer this question.
My understanding is that the percentage elongation is not required for the weld.
Thank you.
Best regards.
PJA
It seems you need a usual welding material like E71T-1M/E71T-1
Siegbert
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: material...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag von Raghuram Bathula
Gesendet: Samstag, 29. Januar 2011 14:14
An: Materials & Welding
Betreff: [MW:9550] Re: Requirement of suitable welding consumables SAW and
SMAW for API 5L X65
--
Since your material is API 5L X65 you can try the following combination,
1. SMAW - E 8018 G (OK 74.70) from ESAB - Take it from Sweden plant.
2. SAW consumables from Lincoln Electric.
AWS Class F8A/P8 - E Ni5 - Ni5
Trade Names
P240 - Flux
LNS 165 - Wire
From the chemical composition you listed, the Carbon Equivalent value comes to around 0.38.
Preheat the joint around 100 Deg. C, Interpass 250 Deg.C Max.
Since your Diameters are 48" and 36" are you going to back chip from the inside to ensure complete penetration? If yes then you can use OK 74.70.
I you dont have access towards the root side of the weld joint, I will recommend you to use ER 70S 6 or ER 70S2 (GTAW), do not use cellulose electrodes for the root passes.
What ever consumable that has been mentioned above, please make sure that all of them meets the minimum specified properties of the base material (X65).
Both the SMAW and SAW conusmables mentioned above will definitely meet your requirement of X65 and for ER 70S 6 or ER 70S 2 you'll have to talk to the manufacturer / dealer.
Make sure you get conusmable TC batch tested (Both mechanical and chemical), do not accept batch TC's showing typical values.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
A.Praveen
Muscat
--- On Sat, 1/29/11, Siegbert Hafenscherer <siegbert.h...@welding-alloys.com> wrote:
To: <material...@googlegroups.com>
From: "pgoswami" <pgos...@quickclic.net>
Sent by: material...@googlegroups.com
Date: 01/30/2011 06:14PM
Subject: [MW:9561] Requirement of suitable welding consumables SAW and SMAW
This email and any attached files ("Message") may contain confidential and/or privileged information. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you receive this Message in error, inform the sender by reply email, delete the Message and destroy any printed copy.
Any unauthorized use, distribution, or copying of this Message or any part thereof is prohibited. Emails are susceptible to alteration. Neither Technip nor any of its affiliates shall be liable for the Message if altered or falsified nor shall they be liable for any damage caused by any virus that might be transmitted with this Message.
Mr.Muthu,
I have qualified and used these combinations on ISO 3183-3 L485MCS (API 5L X70 Equivalent) successfully.
Your PQR will get through comfortably for X65 grade.
As I have mentioned earlier in my mail, Your acceptance criteria of the PQR should as a minimum meet the minimum specified properties of the base material and any additional requirements imposed by your clients specifications.
I have attached a sample copy of OK 74.70 consumable TC for your reference, you can see the actual values of yield, tensile and impact properties of the particular batch of electrode is meeting your minimum requirement of X 65 |
|
YS - 448 MPa.
TS - 531 MPa.
EL% - 23 -
Impact at 0 deg.C 27 Joules. |
since the nickel is less than 1% you can use it for sour service as well, only care you should take is to make sure the capping pass HAZ doesnt exceed 275 HV, if at all sour service is imposed. |
|
Hope this helps,
Regards,
A.Praveen
Muscat
|
|
Mr.Muthu,
You mean to say that the PQR when qualified should meet or exceed the actual values mentioned in the MTC and not the minimum specified for the base material (X65).
I think such a requirement is very unusual, you can match the strength part, but I think its going to be a difficult task in locating a consumable to give you 46% elongation.
Wish you good luck!
Regards,
Praveen |
|