John,
Thanks for illustrations on EN/ISO design specification for tube to tube sheet weld. ASME Sec-IX does not specify any requirements on Tube to tube sheet weld design. Sec-VIII, DIV-1 covers this aspect under UW-20 with additional guidelines in form of good engineering practices in Appendix-A.
Yes you’re right, there is no straight thumb rule in Sec-VIII, if there were something it would have helped everyone.
However the interpretation of the code is that Minimum Leak Path:- i.e. the shortest distance from the bottom-most point (depth) of the groove shall be at least equal to the thickness of the tube or more.
Dimensions of leak path could change depending on the weld design (i.e. depth of groove, J-radius etc), joint efficiency factor, etc . Thus it should be calculated by the designer and the values should be established through detailed calculation as under UW-20, definitely before fabrication.
I ran a quick illustration on UW-20, i.e. basis for calculation for Tube-Tube sheet weld. T-TS weld is is very subjective to joint design , hence I have seen that the leak path issue is being resolved on a specific joint design basis.
Thanks
Pradip Goswami,
P.Eng.
Welding & Metallurgical Engineer/Specialist
Ontario Power
Generation
Inc.
Email-p...@sympatico.ca,
pgos...@quickclic.net
THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Ontario Power Generation Inc.
Pradip,
You are correct.
I was hasty in my comment – however for the particular material and design parameters we employ the result is an over welded joint (more than 50%). As long as QW-193.1.3(d) is met, our joints have been compliant. If tube diameter and/or thickness changes significantly this will have to be revisited.
John